l*******3 发帖数: 1074 | 1 有个中性,甚至说缺点的引用文章 (我的论文是个其中的不提名的footnote引用):
Despite promising developments in xxx algorithms, a substantial gap remains
between yyy and zzz [58]–[61].
这个论文是很多Harvard和Yale的人发表的,所以想利用一下, 我能这么吹么?
Harvard and Yale researchers highly rated xxxx as a promising development in
xxx algorithm.
会不会起到反效果啊?高手请指点!! |
t******1 发帖数: 2239 | 2 觉得不要提吧,大家的PL都写的这么详细到一个点上么?我的怎么都是大段摘抄的阿 |
d***y 发帖数: 8107 | 3 没太看懂原帖,既然都没有提你的名字(或者你group的名字),从何而吹 |
l*******3 发帖数: 1074 | 4 My paper was cited here "[58]–[61]";
what can i do about this kind of cited paper? ignore? |
t*********e 发帖数: 313 | 5 Mention only the positive parts, |