g*******n
发帖数: 224 | 1 背景: 美国学位, 环境分析方向, 2篇英文一作, 一篇英文二作(老板挂第一,我的工作,
4.7影响因子), 其他作三篇,
会议talk11篇(全是老板第一,我第二).
Citation 来自50个科研机构,近二十个国家
5封推荐信,3美1德一中国faculty
EB1B, claim了 contribution and authorship，
The record demonstrates that the beneficiary was offered a position of XXX
by XX university. The record reflects that beneficiary participated in
numerous research studies and projects. while useful and of potential
benefit, the presented evidence does not demonstrate that the beneficiary is
internationally recognized as outstanding. evidence submitted must
demonstrated that the beneficiary's work has been both original and a
contribution to the field as a whole.
Further, the evidence of the record, including the various letters,
demonstrates that the beneficiary is a skilled and determined researcher in
the field of XXX. However, the record does not reflect that the academic
community has recognized the value of her work and her contributions to the
field to such an extent as to demonstrate that she has been internationally
recoginzed as outstanding.
while it appears that the beneficiary is currently investigating XX,
designed XX and developed XX, the record fail to establish that the
beneficiary is recognized internationally as outstanding in her field.
It is noted that the authors make reference to the practically applicability
of the beneficiary's research. Ultimately, the evdence demonstrates that
the beneficiary's work has promise and potential, but has yet to rise to the
level of contributions to the field as a whole as of the date of filing the
petition. Furthermore, the authors comment on the future significance of
the beneficiary's ongoing work rather than show how her work has already
impacted the field to the extent that it can be considered as being
recognized internationlly as outstanding.
additionally, the commendation letters discuss the beneficiary's published
and presented work as evidence of her original contributions. However,
participation in scientific conferences is routine and expected in the
scientific community and publication of one's findings is inherent to all
researchers. The record contains no documentation showing that presentation
or publication of the beneficiary's work is unusual in her field. Of far
greater importance in this proceeding is the impact and contribution to the
field that the beneficiary's work has already had on the overall field.
Depending on a given field of endeavor, other evidence can satisfactorily
show impact in the field. If the beneficiary has written scholarly articles
, heavy independent citation of those articles would be objective evidence
that other researchers have relied on her work. for an individual who holds
one or more patents, evidence of significant implementation of the patented
innovation should be considered. any other relevant evidence may include,
for example, documentation that the beneficiary's orignial contribution has
provoked widespread public commentary in the field.
moreover, the beneficiary authored articles published in research journals
and conference presentations. However, frequent publication of research
findings is inherent to success as an established researcher and does not
necessarily indicate international acclaim requisite to this classification.
Evidence of publications must be accompanied by documentation of the
beneficiary's articles being international cited by other independent
experts in the field of other proof that the beneficiary's publications have
had a significant impact on the field. In this case, the beneficiary's
articles were minimally cited. Therefore, it is difficult to determine how
such limited exposure and recognition demonstrates that the beneficiary's
work has garnered international attention as outstanding. Therefore, the
petitioner failed to establish that the beneficiary's work has attracted a
level of interest in the field commensurate with being internationally
recognized as outstanding. | c******w
发帖数: 1108 | | M****a
发帖数: 5211 | 3 具体说说你的背景和RFE的情况 大家也好给你打打气出出主意 | w*****0
发帖数: 3349 | | l*******e
发帖数: 273 | 5 看看我的case，你会找到信心的。我直接收到的是NOID。
我花了整个周末，重新一点一点的整理我的材料，不管最终能不能批，我尽力了。 | z***b
发帖数: 4667 | 6 别放弃，把背景和rfe原文贴出来
别被表象吓到了
bless
【在 g*******n 的大作中提到】
: 背景: 美国学位, 环境分析方向, 2篇英文一作, 一篇英文二作(老板挂第一,我的工作,
: 4.7影响因子), 其他作三篇,
: 会议talk11篇(全是老板第一,我第二).
: Citation 来自50个科研机构,近二十个国家
: 5封推荐信,3美1德一中国faculty
: EB1B, claim了 contribution and authorship，
: The record demonstrates that the beneficiary was offered a position of XXX
: by XX university. The record reflects that beneficiary participated in
: numerous research studies and projects. while useful and of potential
: benefit, the presented evidence does not demonstrate that the beneficiary is
| L*****i
发帖数: 129 | | p******y
发帖数: 1466 | 8 贴贴背景和RFE吧，让大家给你出主意。
Btw
，EB1b不是90%的通过率吗？最近这是怎么了？
【在 g*******n 的大作中提到】
: 背景: 美国学位, 环境分析方向, 2篇英文一作, 一篇英文二作(老板挂第一,我的工作,
: 4.7影响因子), 其他作三篇,
: 会议talk11篇(全是老板第一,我第二).
: Citation 来自50个科研机构,近二十个国家
: 5封推荐信,3美1德一中国faculty
: EB1B, claim了 contribution and authorship，
: The record demonstrates that the beneficiary was offered a position of XXX
: by XX university. The record reflects that beneficiary participated in
: numerous research studies and projects. while useful and of potential
: benefit, the presented evidence does not demonstrate that the beneficiary is
| W*******n
发帖数: 2762 | | i******t
发帖数: 22541 | 10 1b悲剧 如果不是公司的问题 那一定是律师的问题
自己要积极配合并且督促律师 | | | x***h
发帖数: 9020 | 11 rfe在approve也在90%里面
所以approve与否跟rfe没关系
【在 p******y 的大作中提到】
: 贴贴背景和RFE吧，让大家给你出主意。
: Btw
: ，EB1b不是90%的通过率吗？最近这是怎么了？
| L*******n
发帖数: 1447 | 12 bless，好好准备，祝愿你能够通过
【在 g*******n 的大作中提到】
: 背景: 美国学位, 环境分析方向, 2篇英文一作, 一篇英文二作(老板挂第一,我的工作,
: 4.7影响因子), 其他作三篇,
: 会议talk11篇(全是老板第一,我第二).
: Citation 来自50个科研机构,近二十个国家
: 5封推荐信,3美1德一中国faculty
: EB1B, claim了 contribution and authorship，
: The record demonstrates that the beneficiary was offered a position of XXX
: by XX university. The record reflects that beneficiary participated in
: numerous research studies and projects. while useful and of potential
: benefit, the presented evidence does not demonstrate that the beneficiary is
| b****j
发帖数: 2414 | | g*******n
发帖数: 224 | | f******u
发帖数: 166 | 15 老兄，贴下背景看看，不然很难给建议
【在 g*******n 的大作中提到】
: 自己顶
| t*********e
发帖数: 444 | | d*******n
发帖数: 4778 | 17
The record demonstrates that the beneficiary was offered a position of XXX
by XX university. The record reflects that beneficiary participated in
numerous research studies and projects. while useful and of potential
benefit, the presented evidence does not demonstrate that the beneficiary is
internationally recognized as outstanding. evidence submitted must
demonstrated that the beneficiary's work has been both original and a
contribution to the field as a whole.
----你没有第一作者的文章吗？如果有，就是original的呀。别人在你之前做出来的话
，你的paper也发不了呀。
Further, the evidence of the record, including the various letters,
demonstrates that the beneficiary is a skilled and determined researcher in
the field of XXX. However, the record does not reflect that the academic
community has recognized the value of her work and her contributions to the
field to such an extent as to demonstrate that she has been internationally
recoginzed as outstanding.
while it appears that the beneficiary is currently investigating XX,
designed XX and developed XX, the record fail to establish that the
beneficiary is recognized internationally as outstanding in her field.
It is noted that the authors make reference to the practically applicability
of the beneficiary's research. Ultimately, the evdence demonstrates that
the beneficiary's work has promise and potential, but has yet to rise to the
level of contributions to the field as a whole as of the date of filing the
petition. Furthermore, the authors comment on the future significance of
the beneficiary's ongoing work rather than show how her work has already
impacted the field to the extent that it can be considered as being
recognized internationlly as outstanding.
----上面这三段都是说你没有being recognized internationlly as outstanding，我
觉得奇怪，你没有citation吗？难道你的citation都是一个国家的？另外，citation
还会涉及到和你的领域相关或相近的领域呀。
additionally, the commendation letters discuss the beneficiary's published
and presented work as evidence of her original contributions. However,
participation in scientific conferences is routine and expected in the
scientific community and publication of one's findings is inherent to all
researchers. The record contains no documentation showing that presentation
or publication of the beneficiary's work is unusual in her field. Of far
greater importance in this proceeding is the impact and contribution to the
field that the beneficiary's work has already had on the overall field.
----IO认为会议上的presentation只是你的routine工作，针对这一点，如果能找个推
荐人，再support一下，强调这是international范围的conference，如果你要是获奖了
，则更好。
Depending on a given field of endeavor, other evidence can satisfactorily
show impact in the field. If the beneficiary has written scholarly articles
, heavy independent citation of those articles would be objective evidence
that other researchers have relied on her work. for an individual who holds
one or more patents, evidence of significant implementation of the patented
innovation should be considered. any other relevant evidence may include,
for example, documentation that the beneficiary's orignial contribution has
provoked widespread public commentary in the field.
moreover, the beneficiary authored articles published in research journals
and conference presentations. However, frequent publication of research
findings is inherent to success as an established researcher and does not
necessarily indicate international acclaim requisite to this classification.
Evidence of publications must be accompanied by documentation of the
beneficiary's articles being international cited by other independent
experts in the field of other proof that the beneficiary's publications have
had a significant impact on the field. In this case, the beneficiary's
articles were minimally cited.
----上面这两段来看，IO对你的publication和citation的数量似乎不满意，因为前面
IO提到的说你没有被internationally承认，好像也是基于这个。如果事实不像IO所认
为的那样，就是你的材料，特别是你的petition letter可能没有弄好，在好好整理整
理。
Again,个人看法！
【在 g*******n 的大作中提到】
: 自己顶
| c*********8
发帖数: 1681 | | w****2
发帖数: 5760 | | d*******n
发帖数: 4778 | 20 应该是TSC，NSC貌似没有1153的IO
【在 c*********8 的大作中提到】
: TSC? NSC?
| g*******n
发帖数: 224 | | g*******n
发帖数: 224 | 22 thanks, 包子已发
is
【在 d*******n 的大作中提到】
: 应该是TSC，NSC貌似没有1153的IO
|
|
