|
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
c***p
发帖数: 1042 | 1 EB1A 被 RFE了， 需要research plan,
Claim了老三样，contribution也没过。
3个包子求个engineering research plan的模板.
Thanks！ | b*******e
发帖数: 24532 | 2 能不能把原文贴出来？
【在 c***p 的大作中提到】
: EB1A 被 RFE了， 需要research plan,
: Claim了老三样，contribution也没过。
: 3个包子求个engineering research plan的模板.
: Thanks！
| c***p
发帖数: 1042 | 3 RFE 就是给了个模板
A. Documentation to establish that the beneficiary will continue to work in
their claimed area of expertise
It must be shown how the beneficiary will continue working in the United
States in the claimed area of expertise. The petition does not indicate that
the beneficiary has prearranged commitments for working in this field.
Please submit evidence that the beneficiary is coming to the United States
to continue work in the field. The work must be in the field in which the
beneficiary has garnered sustained national or international acclaim and
that their achievements have been recognized indicating that they are one of
that small percentage who has risen to the very top of the field. Evidence
that may be submitted to satisfy this requirement includes, but is not
limited to:
1. Letters from current or prospective employers:
2. Employment contracts; or
3. A statement from the beneficiary detailing plans on how they intend to
continue work in the United States.
B. Documentation to establish that the beneficiary’s entry will
substantially benefit prospectively the United States
It must be shown how the beneficiary's entry will substantially benefit
prospectively the United States. The petition does not indicate that the
beneficiary's entry will substantially benefit prospectively the United
States. Please submit evidence that the beneficiary's entry will
substantially benefit prospectively the United States. Evidence that may be
submitted to satisfy this requirement includes; but is not limited to:
1. Letters from current or prospective employers, or individuals who work in
the beneficiary's field;
2. Other evidence explaining how the beneficiary's work will be advantageous
and of use to the interests of the United States on a national level; or
3. A statement from the beneficiary detailing plans on how their work will
substantially benefit prospectively the United States.
C. Evidence of the beneficiary's original scientific, scholarly, artistic,
athletic, or business-related contributions of major significance in the
field.
This criterion has not been met because the evidence submitted does not show
that the beneficiary's contributions are considered to be major
significance in the field of endeavor. Simply going on record and explaining
the beneficiary's work is not sufficient to establish that the beneficiary'
s contributions are of major significance. To assist in determining whether
the beneficiary's contributions are original and of major
significance in the field, the petitioner may submit:
1. Objective documentary evidence of the significance of the beneficiary's
contribution to the field;
2. Documentary evidence that people throughout the field currently consider
the beneficiary's work important;
3. Testimony and/or support letters from experts which discussed the
beneficiary's contributions of major significance;
4. Evidence that the beneficiary's major significant contribution(s) has
provoked widespread public commentary in the field or has been widely cited;
and
5. Evidence of the beneficiary's work being implemented by others. Possible
evidence may include but is not limited to:
Contracts with companies using the beneficiary's products;
Licensed technology being used by others; and
Patents currently being utilized and shown to be significant to the field.
Note: Letters and testimonies, if submitted, must provide as much detail as
possible about the beneficiary's contribution and must explain, in detail,
how the contribution was" "original" (not merely replicating the work of
others) and how the contributions were of “major” significance. General
statements regarding the importance of the endeavors which are not supported
by documentary evidence are insufficient. | b*******e
发帖数: 24532 | 4 主要还是在C啊, 这个要好好准备。
in
that
of
【在 c***p 的大作中提到】
: RFE 就是给了个模板
: A. Documentation to establish that the beneficiary will continue to work in
: their claimed area of expertise
: It must be shown how the beneficiary will continue working in the United
: States in the claimed area of expertise. The petition does not indicate that
: the beneficiary has prearranged commitments for working in this field.
: Please submit evidence that the beneficiary is coming to the United States
: to continue work in the field. The work must be in the field in which the
: beneficiary has garnered sustained national or international acclaim and
: that their achievements have been recognized indicating that they are one of
| c***p
发帖数: 1042 | 5 是啊， 全部引用加在一起才60几个,硬件已经都claim了，只好再发掘发掘推荐信了。
对于前两条就准备搞个模板改一下算了. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
