h*****y
发帖数: 218 | 1 版上知名律师事务所的律师的PL,不是不相信他的工作，只是我有几个疑问看看大家都如何的
第一个疑问
contribution 放在第一部分，但是只摘录了推荐信里面的话，不过推荐信都这么写的
"on the top of ",
"small group of xxx who lead the field"
"absolutely among the best researchers"
"truly one of the leaders in the field of "
"offers insight and direction for other international researchers."
几乎所有推荐信都强调了original, major, contribution.
可是什么citations啊，email request啊，还有网站的转载啊，课程的reading list啊
，都放在publications 部分了，这跟我理解的不一样啊，至少citations我一直认为是
来support contribution的，难道律师觉得前面推荐信里面的话已经足够strong了，不
需要提其他的了么？
第二个疑问
律师对我citation的数字，就一句话就带过了，我有110+次，country的数目，也一句
话带过了，大家都是如此么？
第三个疑问
我几乎都是第一作者的citation，律师没有过分强调，这个强调一下第一作者的，有必
要么？ | n***p
发帖数: 7668 | 2 我的律师的PL就是这样写的. The following is my udnerstanding.
1. Contribution is about what you have done and what influence your
work has. So it is perfectly OK to list your results and justify
their importance from the independent experts's words.
2. Citation justifies the importance of your publicaitons. So it
supports Authorship. After all, you need to justify that your
publication is very top in your field.
3. Citation is just a number, you may elaborate it a little bit by
comparison with others.
4. About first authored papers, the IO surely can see it in the list
of your publications.
都如何的
【在 h*****y 的大作中提到】
: 版上知名律师事务所的律师的PL,不是不相信他的工作，只是我有几个疑问看看大家都如何的
: 第一个疑问
: contribution 放在第一部分，但是只摘录了推荐信里面的话，不过推荐信都这么写的
: "on the top of ",
: "small group of xxx who lead the field"
: "absolutely among the best researchers"
: "truly one of the leaders in the field of "
: "offers insight and direction for other international researchers."
: 几乎所有推荐信都强调了original, major, contribution.
: 可是什么citations啊，email request啊，还有网站的转载啊，课程的reading list啊
|
|
