q*i
发帖数: 1 | 1 https://blogs.sciencemag.org/pipeline/archives/2020/06/08/not-winning-
friends-not-influencing-people
https://cen.acs.org/research-integrity/ethics/Essay-criticizing-efforts-
increase-diversity-in-organic-synthesis-deleted-after-backlash-from-chemists
/98/web/2020/06
https://mjbojdys.wordpress.com/2020/06/05/organic-synthesis-quo-vadis/
https://sci-hub.tw/downloads-ii/2020-06-05/1b/[email protected]
TL;NR: Tomáš Hudlicky在Angewandte Chemie（圈内老牌顶刊）发了篇据说是
peer-reviewed的essay，引起争议的大概是这两段：
> In the last two decades many groups and/or individuals have been
designated with “preferential status”. This in spite of the fact that the
percentage of women and minorities in academia and pharmaceutical *industry
has greatly increased. It follows that, in a social equilibrium, *
preferential treatment of one group leads to disadvantages for another. New
ideologies have appeared and influenced hiring practices, promotion, funding
, and recognition of
certain groups. Each candidate should have an equal opportunity to secure a
position, regardless of personal identification/categorization. The rise and
emphasis on hiring practices that suggest or even mandate equality in terms
of absolute numbers of people in specific subgroups is counter-productive
if it results in discrimination against the most meritorious candidates.
Such
practice affects the format of interviews and has led to the emergence of
mandatory “training workshops” on gender equity, inclusion, diversity, and
discrimination
> The training and mentoring of new generations of professionals must be
attended to by proper relationships of “masters and apprentices” without
dilution of standards.
星号（*）标注原文typo
结果：数小时后文章下线，两名编辑suspended，审稿人不再录用，16个PI从
International Advisory Board辞职。
感想：这哥们今年71岁，圈内自杀？ |
|
