由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
Faculty版 - NIH的声明是警告美帝学者吧 (转载)
相关主题
生物学技术一问文章round2 review回来,请问是否要update申请的学校
美华裔教授成物理学诺奖热门人选评终身教职的问题
国内科研水平不得了了,河北科技大学在Nature Biotechnoligy发表重要成果大家审稿一般花多长时间?
韩春雨为什么牛?在较权威的杂志的文章里 发现一个重大的错误 怎么办?
中央用人不疑,《自然》获得韩春雨实验可重复性新数据 (转载)如果申请30-50所学校的AP,推荐人不烦死了?
颜宁:从动笔到发Science,最短3天!邵峰院士: 如何才能涌现更多“韩春雨”?
NIH对基础研究回心转意了?还是?问个问题:什么是translational research? (转载)
NSF 答疑调研了一下清华最近回去的PI
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: human话题: nih话题: he话题: embryos
进入Faculty版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
b*****d
发帖数: 61690
1
【 以下文字转载自 Military 讨论区 】
发信人: brihand (brihand), 信区: Military
标 题: NIH的声明是警告美帝学者吧
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Thu Nov 29 00:51:15 2018, 美东)
NIH is deeply concerned about the work just presented at the Second
International Summit on Human Genome Editing in Hong Kong by Dr. He Jiankui,
who described his effort using CRISPR-Cas9 on human embryos to disable the
CCR5 gene. He claims that the two embryos were subsequently implanted, and
infant twins have been born. This work represents a deeply disturbing
willingness by Dr. He and his team to flout international ethical norms. The
project was largely carried out in secret, the medical necessity for
inactivation of CCR5 in these infants is utterly unconvincing, the informed
consent process appears highly questionable, and the possibility of damaging
off-target effects has not been satisfactorily explored. It is profoundly
unfortunate that the first apparent application of this powerful technique
to the human germline has been carried out so irresponsibly. The need for
development of binding international consensus on setting limits for this
kind of research, now being debated in Hong Kong, has never been more
apparent. Without such limits, the world will face the serious risk of a
deluge of similarly ill-considered and unethical projects. Should such epic
scientific misadventures proceed, a technology with enormous promise for
prevention and treatment of disease will be overshadowed by justifiable
public outrage, fear, and disgust.
Lest there be any doubt, and as we have stated previously, NIH does not
support the use of gene-editing technologies in human embryos.
Francis S. Collins, M.D., Ph.D.
Director, National Institutes of Health
w*********o
发帖数: 3030
2
It takes time. This won't be the end of it.
do you really think there is anything beyond copying yet from any biological
research (or any other field of research that's worthwhile for human kind)
from China?
It is ok to copy when one is behind. This is how Japan and South Korea got
started. But they didn't try to steal the bell while covering their ears to
bill their early work as "innovative" and they did build a trust worthy
scientific system based on honesty, at least Japan appeared to have achieved
that. Jury is still out for South Korea.
China? even if there might be honest, smart and hardworking ones who try to
achieve that, they will be swallowed by the many more liers because the
system is build to promote dishonesty. Even the Chinese outside China are
silenced by that system. The result is apparent on this board.
As for US, as a country, it really have no need to go beyond lip service to
protect the citizen of another country from its government, especially there
is something to gain (data).
f*********e
发帖数: 185
3
科学家有时候也是最无知的一群人。

Jiankui,
the
The

【在 b*****d 的大作中提到】
: 【 以下文字转载自 Military 讨论区 】
: 发信人: brihand (brihand), 信区: Military
: 标 题: NIH的声明是警告美帝学者吧
: 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Thu Nov 29 00:51:15 2018, 美东)
: NIH is deeply concerned about the work just presented at the Second
: International Summit on Human Genome Editing in Hong Kong by Dr. He Jiankui,
: who described his effort using CRISPR-Cas9 on human embryos to disable the
: CCR5 gene. He claims that the two embryos were subsequently implanted, and
: infant twins have been born. This work represents a deeply disturbing
: willingness by Dr. He and his team to flout international ethical norms. The

K*****2
发帖数: 9308
4
NIH只能管学校这些拿了他家钱的
美国私人出资搞基因编辑是合法的
w*********o
发帖数: 3030
5
If you are a robot from China, maybe try to be a good robot when real people
are talking?
If not, maybe try to learn something about US before commenting on things
you have no clue about?
You can edit all you want, implanting genetic edited human embryo need
layers and layers of approval, privately funded or not.

【在 K*****2 的大作中提到】
: NIH只能管学校这些拿了他家钱的
: 美国私人出资搞基因编辑是合法的

1 (共1页)
进入Faculty版参与讨论
相关主题
给正在找faculty工作的兄弟姐妹分享一点小小的心得中央用人不疑,《自然》获得韩春雨实验可重复性新数据 (转载)
co-first authorship先后有关系吗?颜宁:从动笔到发Science,最短3天!
请教如何分类管理papersNIH对基础研究回心转意了?还是?
research statement对申请AP有多重要NSF 答疑
生物学技术一问文章round2 review回来,请问是否要update申请的学校
美华裔教授成物理学诺奖热门人选评终身教职的问题
国内科研水平不得了了,河北科技大学在Nature Biotechnoligy发表重要成果大家审稿一般花多长时间?
韩春雨为什么牛?在较权威的杂志的文章里 发现一个重大的错误 怎么办?
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: human话题: nih话题: he话题: embryos