s**********t
发帖数: 544 | 1 现在Nature以及其子刊都提供双盲review的服务。我们最近有一篇文章有新意，但是文
章的主题不是本实验室的强项、所以想试一下他们的双盲评审。大家有没有谁试过，感
觉怎么样？这个double blind 选项是从去年二月份开始的，现在也快一年半了。 |
e********a
发帖数: 262 | 2 我最近投了一个
没用这选项
还没送审，不知死活。。。 |
j*****r
发帖数: 48 | 3 We tried it once recently for a Nature sister journal, and it worked for us.
The paper was sent out for review to three reviewers, and then resubmission
, revision, etc etc. My impression is that every step of the double-blind
review is identical to the typical process, with the only exception that the
reviewers should not know your names.
Our experience is a small sample size (of 1!). I suppose there is nothing to
lose to try. |
s**********t
发帖数: 544 | 4 如果组里在文章的主题上有 good track record的话还是不要用double blind比较好
. 祝好运！
【在 e********a 的大作中提到】
: 我最近投了一个
: 没用这选项
: 还没送审，不知死活。。。
|
s**********t
发帖数: 544 | 5 Thanks for sharing. Was it slower? It might be harder for the editor to find
reviewers who are willing to do double blind.
us.
resubmission
the
to
【在 j*****r 的大作中提到】
: We tried it once recently for a Nature sister journal, and it worked for us.
: The paper was sent out for review to three reviewers, and then resubmission
: , revision, etc etc. My impression is that every step of the double-blind
: review is identical to the typical process, with the only exception that the
: reviewers should not know your names.
: Our experience is a small sample size (of 1!). I suppose there is nothing to
: lose to try.
|
j*****r
发帖数: 48 | 6 The first round of reviews came back after 4-5 weeks. I think that's typical
. |
s**********t
发帖数: 544 | 7 那这个还真是挺快的，有时候编辑了拖两周，审稿人拖个五六个星期，第一轮回来就是
已经两个多月了
typical
【在 j*****r 的大作中提到】
: The first round of reviews came back after 4-5 weeks. I think that's typical
: .
|
c********n
发帖数: 1065 | 8 靠的就是老子的名气才能发这些journal 你让我double blind？疯了？
[在 speedoflight (飞跃无限) 的大作中提到：]
:现在Nature以及其子刊都提供双盲review的服务。我们最近有一篇文章有新意，但是
文章的主题不是本实验室的强项、所以想试一下他们的双盲评审。大家有没有谁试过，
感觉怎么样？这个double blind 选项是从去年二月份开始的，现在也快一年半了。
:☆ 发自 iPhone 买买提 1.22.06 |
