R*****u
发帖数: 712 | 1 请教一个审稿的问题,the authors在manuscript中的introdcution中说 "A recent
study revealed XXX 能增加食欲(unpublished work).Therefore, XXX might be
useful to 用于厌食症治疗.". 然后在discussion中又说 "We also had found this
phenomenon in many extreme halophytes and glycophytes (unpublished data). "
When the same experiments were performed with XXXX, similar results were
obtained (unpublished data)".
关于这个unpublished work, 到底可不可以这样用于支持论点啊? 感觉好像是循环论证
似的, 该怎么写comments? 多谢 | R*****u
发帖数: 712 | | l***d
发帖数: 1798 | 3 要求提供这些数据在supplemental file.
【在 R*****u 的大作中提到】
: 请教一个审稿的问题,the authors在manuscript中的introdcution中说 "A recent
: study revealed XXX 能增加食欲(unpublished work).Therefore, XXX might be
: useful to 用于厌食症治疗.". 然后在discussion中又说 "We also had found this
: phenomenon in many extreme halophytes and glycophytes (unpublished data). "
: When the same experiments were performed with XXXX, similar results were
: obtained (unpublished data)".
: 关于这个unpublished work, 到底可不可以这样用于支持论点啊? 感觉好像是循环论证
: 似的, 该怎么写comments? 多谢
| R*****u
发帖数: 712 | 4 多谢。 我以前也这么做过一次，是想把这数据发表在别的杂志，不想放在
supplemental file 里，不过他这个太多了， 有三处用unpublished data 来support
claim， 感觉是不是太过分了
【在 l***d 的大作中提到】
: 要求提供这些数据在supplemental file.
|
|
