e*****t
发帖数: 205 | 1 给自己每年claim$24,000的工资，然后只雇一个phd干活，自己的工资比一个phd一年的
都多，这样的proposal是不是没戏啊，看着就像灭 |
C*S
发帖数: 1658 | 2 You need to focus on the intellectual merits of the proposal.
Budget issues are mainly at program director's discretion.
However, you may want to draw director's attention to this issue. |
e*****t
发帖数: 205 | 3 谢谢～
【在 C*S 的大作中提到】
: You need to focus on the intellectual merits of the proposal.
: Budget issues are mainly at program director's discretion.
: However, you may want to draw director's attention to this issue.
|
R*****o
发帖数: 14902 | 4 I say kill it.
【在 e*****t 的大作中提到】
: 给自己每年claim$24,000的工资，然后只雇一个phd干活，自己的工资比一个phd一年的
: 都多，这样的proposal是不是没戏啊，看着就像灭
|
r*****u
发帖数: 94 | 5 I want to second this.
This is a very professional way of doing things.
This kind of budget will affect reviewers' feelings. I have seen this kind
of proposals being killed by senior professors in a panel. Of course, you
can not use the budget issue as the main argument (In my example, the senior
professor listed this as an argument in the review). You need to find
weakness in intellectual merit and broad impact of the proposal (usually it
is not difficult to find :))
【在 C*S 的大作中提到】
: You need to focus on the intellectual merits of the proposal.
: Budget issues are mainly at program director's discretion.
: However, you may want to draw director's attention to this issue.
|
m*m
发帖数: 1185 | |
U*******1
发帖数: 1565 | 7 One month 工资 makes sense. Not a big deal.
The Faculty will spend one month work on the project and ask one month 工资.
There is nothing worng about this,
Your guys are too picky. |
b*****d
发帖数: 61690 | 8 NSF只让budget两个月的工资。
【在 m*m 的大作中提到】
: 这个是月工资 还是暑假3个月工资？
|
b*****n
发帖数: 684 | 9 My experience - on NSF panels sometimes reviewers pick on budget, but
usually the PM will speak up and let the panel focus on the proposal itself.
For DoD research projects (not education specific), nobody cares about how
the budget is distributed, only the total number. |
