b*******l 发帖数: 1737 | 1 现在已经知道批绿卡的顺序给PD和姓名无关了。那么现在到底有没有任何证据能证明批
绿卡的顺序和RD有无关系? |
p********7 发帖数: 849 | |
R****r 发帖数: 623 | 3 两,三个月前我曾经和一个移民局官员联系过,有他们亲自的email. 说一旦current.
批是按RD进行。原文如下:
......
Please note: when visas become available all applications and petitions are
processed based on receipt date order.
......
这个原则是确定的,但实际操作并不尽然。主要是堆放申请材料location的问题。
【在 b*******l 的大作中提到】 : 现在已经知道批绿卡的顺序给PD和姓名无关了。那么现在到底有没有任何证据能证明批 : 绿卡的顺序和RD有无关系?
|
b**********e 发帖数: 460 | 4 是RD还是notice date. 我的RD是8/15/2006。 不知道是不是批了的都比我早。 |
s***i 发帖数: 66 | 5 我的case 比较奇怪。 my RD was 07/29/07, but the notice date is 9/13/07 since
it was transfered to TSC form NSC. So waht would be my RD? 现在还没受到任何
update, 很心焦 |
W***a 发帖数: 33 | 6 You got it wrong. What the immigration officer wrote means ND (receipt
notice date), not RD (Received date). So it means they are proceccing
according to Notice Date on your I-485. Many people may have July 2, 2007 as
RD, but different ND (from July to September).
.
are
【在 R****r 的大作中提到】 : 两,三个月前我曾经和一个移民局官员联系过,有他们亲自的email. 说一旦current. : 批是按RD进行。原文如下: : ...... : Please note: when visas become available all applications and petitions are : processed based on receipt date order. : ...... : 这个原则是确定的,但实际操作并不尽然。主要是堆放申请材料location的问题。
|
s***i 发帖数: 66 | 7 原来是根据notice date, no wonder I haven't received any update. my notice
date is pretty late. |
R****r 发帖数: 623 | 8 RD (or Filing Date - sometimes they use two terms interchangeably). Notice
date is totally different.
Your RD should be 7/29/07 if this is the date that they received your app -
this can be verified through infopass or USCIS help line.
since
【在 s***i 的大作中提到】 : 我的case 比较奇怪。 my RD was 07/29/07, but the notice date is 9/13/07 since : it was transfered to TSC form NSC. So waht would be my RD? 现在还没受到任何 : update, 很心焦
|
R****r 发帖数: 623 | 9 You misunderstood RD. RD is called receipt date. Once your application
arrives USCIS, they will stamp it with a date, that is called Receipt Date.
The notice date, is totally different,it's the date when USCIS send you a
letter telling you that they've received your app. It's has been a rule to
use RD for USCIS once current.
as
【在 W***a 的大作中提到】 : You got it wrong. What the immigration officer wrote means ND (receipt : notice date), not RD (Received date). So it means they are proceccing : according to Notice Date on your I-485. Many people may have July 2, 2007 as : RD, but different ND (from July to September). : : . : are
|
l*****l 发帖数: 4691 | 10 这样不是很混乱吗?差不多的RD,比如07大潮的,pd差很远很远。排期是按pd的,以周
为单位前进(1,8,15,22),那么移民局的材料总得以pd分类才合理吧,一周的放一
块儿。这个月有5个月的人current了,把这5个月的文件找出来,再按rd排一遍吗?还
是其实不用实际文件,只在电脑里看就可以了。那样的话更可以严格按照一个顺序了,
怎么能像他们现在这么乱呢。
.
are
【在 R****r 的大作中提到】 : 两,三个月前我曾经和一个移民局官员联系过,有他们亲自的email. 说一旦current. : 批是按RD进行。原文如下: : ...... : Please note: when visas become available all applications and petitions are : processed based on receipt date order. : ...... : 这个原则是确定的,但实际操作并不尽然。主要是堆放申请材料location的问题。
|
|
|
R****r 发帖数: 623 | 11 你讲的没错,其实是就是挺乱的,但用RD有其历史原因。就像现在订的那个7% country
limit一样。所以你可以看到RD的原则并不是严格照办的。
【在 l*****l 的大作中提到】 : 这样不是很混乱吗?差不多的RD,比如07大潮的,pd差很远很远。排期是按pd的,以周 : 为单位前进(1,8,15,22),那么移民局的材料总得以pd分类才合理吧,一周的放一 : 块儿。这个月有5个月的人current了,把这5个月的文件找出来,再按rd排一遍吗?还 : 是其实不用实际文件,只在电脑里看就可以了。那样的话更可以严格按照一个顺序了, : 怎么能像他们现在这么乱呢。 : : . : are
|
l*****l 发帖数: 4691 | 12 唉,他们有个顺序好歹比什么顺序都没有好。不想那么多了,我还是安心慢慢等着吧。
country
【在 R****r 的大作中提到】 : 你讲的没错,其实是就是挺乱的,但用RD有其历史原因。就像现在订的那个7% country : limit一样。所以你可以看到RD的原则并不是严格照办的。
|
b*******l 发帖数: 1737 | 13 马的,老子的ND是10月15号,RD是8月9号。还有比我晚的吗?
【在 l*****l 的大作中提到】 : 唉,他们有个顺序好歹比什么顺序都没有好。不想那么多了,我还是安心慢慢等着吧。 : : country
|
w**t 发帖数: 893 | 14 Rd 也不是绝对的。对同一堆可能。但是有很多移民官在同是工作。如果没人一堆,就
狠难保持顺序了。
country
【在 R****r 的大作中提到】 : 你讲的没错,其实是就是挺乱的,但用RD有其历史原因。就像现在订的那个7% country : limit一样。所以你可以看到RD的原则并不是严格照办的。
|
l**p 发帖数: 569 | 15 patpat。我的RD是9月底的,本来7月就寄到了NSC,结果给转到CSC处理了。
估计没有比我的RD晚的了。
【在 b*******l 的大作中提到】 : 马的,老子的ND是10月15号,RD是8月9号。还有比我晚的吗?
|
R****r 发帖数: 623 | 16 我老就关于RD,还是ND的问题刚才又电话问询了一下上次的官员,结果如下:
1) RD (Receipt Date) <> ND (Notice Date)
2) Why RD is selected not PD or other Ds?
The reason is so obvious - for any categories that have enough visa
availibility, USCIS processes petitions based on first come first serve. In
analogue to use PERM filing date as PD, the only criterion employed here is
the date when an application is filed, namely the date when USCIS receives
your application. ND aka Notice Date, which might be something coined by
immigration forums, is not trackable in USCIS system.
【在 b*******l 的大作中提到】 : 现在已经知道批绿卡的顺序给PD和姓名无关了。那么现在到底有没有任何证据能证明批 : 绿卡的顺序和RD有无关系?
|
R****r 发帖数: 623 | 17 From the attached screenshot, you may see immediately that the Filing Date (
or RD) is so important in your I485 adjudication process - even more than PD.
-
【在 R****r 的大作中提到】 : RD (or Filing Date - sometimes they use two terms interchangeably). Notice : date is totally different. : Your RD should be 7/29/07 if this is the date that they received your app - : this can be verified through infopass or USCIS help line. : : since
|