c***z
发帖数: 6348 | 1 I totally worship this guy!
http://michaelochurch.wordpress.com/2013/03/26/gervais-macleod-
It is not complete nor perfect, but it can be a starting point, or a target
to aim at. | j*****n
发帖数: 1545 | | c***z
发帖数: 6348 | 3 摘要：
There’d be only three levels of software engineer: Apprentice, Engineer,
and Mentor/Fellow (equal; one for teaching and one for research). The Mentor
/Fellow level would be maximum salary in the company. No one would get more
in base salary. Not even me, and certainly not some damn non-technical
executive. That’s to keep such people from robbing investors (and employees
).
About 20 percent of profit gets invested back into the business, no matter
what, unless there’s a conscious decision to reduce cash holdings (and pay
dividends) at business maturity. Thirty-five percent goes to equity-holders,
who decide whether to reinvest it or take a dividend, and 45 percent is
paid in compensation to employees.
High-end investment vehicles (e.g. hedge funds, venture capital) charge a
baseline management fee of 2%, plus and 20% of profits (“2-and-20″). That
’s what wealthy investors have to pay to participate in the above-normal
returns of these funds, and they’re happy to do it. The elite quant funds
(who can reliably deliver double-digit returns) charge more: as high as 5-
and-44. I’d be charging no ongoing “management fee” (once capital is
raised) but investing a high share of the proceeds into employee morale.
Effectively, the model here is “0-and-45″ for access to elite
technological talent (as opposed to 2-and-20 for access to elite financial
strategies). |
|
