d*******g
发帖数: 36 | 1 The accept ratios of conferences are so different.
For example, FOCS and STOC have about 1/3 accept ratios.
But some top conferences in some fields such as database have about 1/10
accept ratio. |
b****n
发帖数: 84 | 2 so?
【在 d*******g 的大作中提到】
: The accept ratios of conferences are so different.
: For example, FOCS and STOC have about 1/3 accept ratios.
: But some top conferences in some fields such as database have about 1/10
: accept ratio.
|
s***e
发帖数: 284 | 3 depends on the size of a community.
most people don't have the brain for theory, right?
【在 d*******g 的大作中提到】
: The accept ratios of conferences are so different.
: For example, FOCS and STOC have about 1/3 accept ratios.
: But some top conferences in some fields such as database have about 1/10
: accept ratio.
|
J**i
发帖数: 166 | 4 The accept ratio of 10% is actually ridiculous, just because there are
too many junk papers.
【在 d*******g 的大作中提到】
: The accept ratios of conferences are so different.
: For example, FOCS and STOC have about 1/3 accept ratios.
: But some top conferences in some fields such as database have about 1/10
: accept ratio.
|
d******y
发帖数: 1039 | 5 烂paper是不敢往STOC/FOCS投的，这个你可以省心了。你看看每次的STOC/FOCS都
有多个turing award的作者混杂其中，其他的大牛就更多了。
【在 d*******g 的大作中提到】
: The accept ratios of conferences are so different.
: For example, FOCS and STOC have about 1/3 accept ratios.
: But some top conferences in some fields such as database have about 1/10
: accept ratio.
|
d*******g
发帖数: 36 | 6 So I am thinking that there may be many junk papers submitted to this COCOON
and ISAAC since the submissions for them have increased more than 300%.
【在 b****n 的大作中提到】
: so?
|
r****c
发帖数: 2585 | 7 For theory paper, do not even worry about the acceptance ratio,
every theory guy knows the difference between stoc/foc ans cocoon/isaac.
Not a problem
【在 d*******g 的大作中提到】
: So I am thinking that there may be many junk papers submitted to this COCOON
: and ISAAC since the submissions for them have increased more than 300%.
|
