l*****k 发帖数: 1059 | |
r*****t 发帖数: 286 | 2 Very good conference in theory. Don't know the exact accept rate though.
【在 l*****k 的大作中提到】 : RT. 谢谢!
|
G*****a 发帖数: 205 | 3 SODA is a good conference!
比INFOCOM 好多了吧
在 robertt (陈龙川) 的大作中提到: 】 |
M*********e 发帖数: 1988 | 4 you are comparing apple with orange.
SODA is a decent conference in theory, not as good as STOC and FOCS though,
but also quite decent.
【在 G*****a 的大作中提到】 : SODA is a good conference! : 比INFOCOM 好多了吧 : 在 robertt (陈龙川) 的大作中提到: 】
|
G*****a 发帖数: 205 | 5 if sb. want to end up at an industry research lab doing Network/Wireless
related research from a slightly theoretic aspect, which conference sells him
better?
【在 M*********e 的大作中提到】 : you are comparing apple with orange. : SODA is a decent conference in theory, not as good as STOC and FOCS though, : but also quite decent.
|
w******s 发帖数: 60 | 6 It is a very good theory conference. Maybe only worse than STOC and FOCS.
Comparable to some other specialized theory conferences. You can find the list
from this board.
【在 G*****a 的大作中提到】 : SODA is a good conference! : 比INFOCOM 好多了吧 : 在 robertt (陈龙川) 的大作中提到: 】
|
x*b 发帖数: 253 | 7 Usually the theory conference acceptance rate is not very low.
This is because not many people working in this area.
list
【在 w******s 的大作中提到】 : It is a very good theory conference. Maybe only worse than STOC and FOCS. : Comparable to some other specialized theory conferences. You can find the list : from this board.
|
r*****y 发帖数: 507 | 8 so comparing with INFOCOMM make no sense.
conferences in different fields are hard to compare.
though.
【在 x*b 的大作中提到】 : Usually the theory conference acceptance rate is not very low. : This is because not many people working in this area. : : list
|
d****i 发帖数: 77 | 9 right. last year soda is about 40%, focs is 1/3. I didn't remember these
figures clearly, but must be around 1/2~1/3. And connections are important
sometimes for getting in for those papers on threshold, too.
FOCS.
the
【在 r*****y 的大作中提到】 : so comparing with INFOCOMM make no sense. : conferences in different fields are hard to compare. : : though.
|
r****c 发帖数: 2585 | 10 search soda 05 on the google, you can find all the statistics
including best student papers
it is more than 30%
although infocom is only 14%
I think I would like to trade 1.5 infocom paper for 1 soda at least
【在 d****i 的大作中提到】 : right. last year soda is about 40%, focs is 1/3. I didn't remember these : figures clearly, but must be around 1/2~1/3. And connections are important : sometimes for getting in for those papers on threshold, too. : : FOCS. : the
|
r****c 发帖数: 2585 | 11 For FOCS, it is even better
I would trade 3 info for 1 FOCS
find
【在 r****c 的大作中提到】 : search soda 05 on the google, you can find all the statistics : including best student papers : it is more than 30% : although infocom is only 14% : I think I would like to trade 1.5 infocom paper for 1 soda at least
|
l*****k 发帖数: 1059 | 12 Thanks. That's helpful. Although we know it is not
an apple 2 apple comparison.
【在 r****c 的大作中提到】 : For FOCS, it is even better : I would trade 3 info for 1 FOCS : : find
|
d****i 发帖数: 77 | 13 The problem is even the accpeting rate is attractive and your paper is good,
it is not easy to get in if they are not familiar with you. sigh...
Soemtimes it quite strange of their standard. I know a famous professsor in
mit last year had some junk papers accpeted, but one of his favorite paper is
rejected by stoc focs and soda...I think that paper is very very good. so
things are quite weird.
important
and
rate
【在 r****c 的大作中提到】 : For FOCS, it is even better : I would trade 3 info for 1 FOCS : : find
|
x*b 发帖数: 253 | 14
is
This happens everywhere.
these
【在 d****i 的大作中提到】 : The problem is even the accpeting rate is attractive and your paper is good, : it is not easy to get in if they are not familiar with you. sigh... : Soemtimes it quite strange of their standard. I know a famous professsor in : mit last year had some junk papers accpeted, but one of his favorite paper is : rejected by stoc focs and soda...I think that paper is very very good. so : things are quite weird. : : important : and : rate
|