p*********6
发帖数: 679 | 1 Playing on BBO with a stranger
Noth:
Q8
T32
KQ32
KQ72
South:
AKJT9765
K8
A5
A
S/N Vul, S dealer (me)
E S W N
2c / 2d* (waiting)
/ 2s / 4nt (1430)
/ 5c / 6s
/ 7s?
Questions:
1) was it ok to bid 7 ? since I have already anwsered 0-4 kc and p still
went to 6. shouldn't p have at least 1 kc for this sequence?
2) was 4nt from North too early ? 2nt and 3s to start cuebid ? cue bids
might not be enough to find the missing A (A or K for cuebid), but 4nt from
South will do.
(Needless to say, op | v*******e
发帖数: 3714 | 2 It does not make sense for North to asking for keycards. Also South should
answer four keycards with 5D. North gamble and bid 6S. End of story.
IMHO the bidding procedure should be something like
2C 2D (or 2NT with such a balanced good hand)
2S 5S
6S. | m****r
发帖数: 6639 | 3 what's wrong with him bidding 6s with your 4 keycards?
i don't like 4nt. spades might not be the best fit. i'd bid 3c, probably.
【在 p*********6 的大作中提到】
: Playing on BBO with a stranger
: Noth:
: Q8
: T32
: KQ32
: KQ72
: South:
: AKJT9765
: K8
: A5
| p*********6
发帖数: 679 | 4 We play 1430 and 2d waiting - both agreed upon on the table. So 4c meant 1
or 4 keycards, obvious 4 here.
【在 v*******e 的大作中提到】
: It does not make sense for North to asking for keycards. Also South should
: answer four keycards with 5D. North gamble and bid 6S. End of story.
: IMHO the bidding procedure should be something like
: 2C 2D (or 2NT with such a balanced good hand)
: 2S 5S
: 6S.
| b***y
发帖数: 2804 | 5 在ＢＢＯ上和stranger的叫牌有啥可讨论的？当然 doesn't make any sense 了，what
can you expect? :-)
4NT是不对，但７Ｓ也很糟糕啊，说说看你凭什么叫７？ | v**********e
发帖数: 1295 | 6 4NT is not good, but it may be the best between strangers.
7S is absolutely a gamble without any reasons.
I may bid 6NT directly after 2S with a stranger, at least I can be the
declear.
【在 p*********6 的大作中提到】
: Playing on BBO with a stranger
: Noth:
: Q8
: T32
: KQ32
: KQ72
: South:
: AKJT9765
: K8
: A5
| v**********e
发帖数: 1295 | 7 2C opening is really trash in green systems. Many conventions has been used
between regular partners. With stranger, the first thing you should consider
is to avoid a catastrophy.
【在 p*********6 的大作中提到】
: Playing on BBO with a stranger
: Noth:
: Q8
: T32
: KQ32
: KQ72
: South:
: AKJT9765
: K8
: A5
| p*********6
发帖数: 679 | 8 This is what I want to find out: whether 7s bid makes sense even among
regular partners if similar situation comes up. I felt that when I answered
4kc, which was max, p still went to 6, then I ought to go 7 (since I could
have less).
what
【在 b***y 的大作中提到】
: 在ＢＢＯ上和stranger的叫牌有啥可讨论的？当然 doesn't make any sense 了，what
: can you expect? :-)
: 4NT是不对，但７Ｓ也很糟糕啊，说说看你凭什么叫７？
| b***y
发帖数: 2804 | 9 No, it doesn't make sense. You tell partner you had 4 kc, he bids 6, that's
the end of it, period. If your side has all kc, partner is supposed to bid
5NT just in case. If a grand slam is missed because partner jumps to 6
prematurely, you win the postmortem.
For this particular hand, even if partner has HA, don't you still need CK or
DK to make 7?
answered
【在 p*********6 的大作中提到】
: This is what I want to find out: whether 7s bid makes sense even among
: regular partners if similar situation comes up. I felt that when I answered
: 4kc, which was max, p still went to 6, then I ought to go 7 (since I could
: have less).
:
: what
| m****r
发帖数: 6639 | 10 i think sometimes, when you have a void, but that cannot be shown in your
methods, you can think about going to 7 after your partner bid 6.
s
or
【在 b***y 的大作中提到】
: No, it doesn't make sense. You tell partner you had 4 kc, he bids 6, that's
: the end of it, period. If your side has all kc, partner is supposed to bid
: 5NT just in case. If a grand slam is missed because partner jumps to 6
: prematurely, you win the postmortem.
: For this particular hand, even if partner has HA, don't you still need CK or
: DK to make 7?
:
: answered
| b***y
发帖数: 2804 | 11 That might work, but in general it is a bad thing to do. I personally
encountered many times that opponents do things like this. More than half of
the time it didn't work, since they had to guess which aces partner had,
and they guessed wrong. Another problem is that, if partner cannot bid in
tempo, almost invariably they will get a director ruling against them. When
you are uncertain about something, don't do it, especially when the decision
is at 7-level. Grand slams should not be bid on specu
【在 m****r 的大作中提到】
: i think sometimes, when you have a void, but that cannot be shown in your
: methods, you can think about going to 7 after your partner bid 6.
:
: s
: or
| m****r
发帖数: 6639 | 12 agree. which is why i said, you can "think" about it, instead of saying you
should do it.
of
When
decision
【在 b***y 的大作中提到】
: That might work, but in general it is a bad thing to do. I personally
: encountered many times that opponents do things like this. More than half of
: the time it didn't work, since they had to guess which aces partner had,
: and they guessed wrong. Another problem is that, if partner cannot bid in
: tempo, almost invariably they will get a director ruling against them. When
: you are uncertain about something, don't do it, especially when the decision
: is at 7-level. Grand slams should not be bid on specu
| b***y
发帖数: 2804 | 13 No, don't even "think" about it. Instead, discuss methods with your partner.
There are ways to show void in response to keycard asking. Other methods
include cuebidding, exclusion blackwood, etc....
【在 m****r 的大作中提到】
: agree. which is why i said, you can "think" about it, instead of saying you
: should do it.
:
: of
: When
: decision
| m****r
发帖数: 6639 | 14 ok. don't think.
partner.
【在 b***y 的大作中提到】
: No, don't even "think" about it. Instead, discuss methods with your partner.
: There are ways to show void in response to keycard asking. Other methods
: include cuebidding, exclusion blackwood, etc....
|
|
