由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
Biology版 - 闫丽梦论文这段算是实锤吗?
相关主题
The SARS Genome - sciencemag进化方面的书求推荐
Re: 有没有一个软件?China As Origins of Historical Plagues
[bssd] 求建议:Comparative genomics vs. NGS data analysis迷茫啊,各位给点建议吧
如何比较两颗phylogenetic tree天皇陛下也是生物猥琐男啊
Re: 跪求:大家到底怎么定题的?求Paper
请帮忙下一篇ScienceDirect的论文multiple sequence alignment技术问题请教
phylogenetic tree请教,这个图是用什么软件画的?
phylogenetic tree急求一篇paper!!! thanks!
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: ratg13话题: zc45话题: sars话题: zxc21话题: cov
进入Biology版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
g******y
发帖数: 1
1
都能懂。
Importantly, ZC45 and ZXC21 are bat coronaviruses that were discovered (
between July 2015 and February 2017), isolated, and characterized by
military research laboratories in the Third Military Medical University (
Chongqing, China) and the Research Institute for Medicine of Nanjing Command
(Nanjing, China). The data and associated work were published in 2018.
Clearly, this backbone/template, which is essential for the creation of SARS
-CoV-2, exists in these and other related research laboratories.
What strengthens our contention further is the published RaTG13 virus, the
genomic sequence of which is reportedly 96% identical to that of SARS-CoV-2.
While suggesting a natural origin of SARS-CoV-2, the RaTG13 virus also
diverted the attention of both the scientific field and the general public
away from ZC45/ZXC21. In fact, a Chinese BSL-3 lab (the Shanghai Public
Health Clinical Centre), which published a Nature article reporting a
conflicting close phylogenetic relationship between SARS-CoV-2 and ZC45/
ZXC21 rather than with RaTG13, was quickly shut down for “rectification”.
It is believed that the researchers of that laboratory were being punished
for having disclosed the SARS-CoV-2—ZC45/ZXC21 connection. On the other
hand, substantial evidence has accumulated, pointing to severe problems
associated with the reported sequence of RaTG13 as well as questioning the
actual existence of this bat virus in nature. A very recent publication also
indicated that the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the RaTG13’s Spike
protein could not bind ACE2 of two different types of horseshoe bats (they
closely relate to the horseshoe bat R. affinis, RaTG13’s alleged natural
host), implicating the inability of RaTG13 to infect horseshoe bats. This
finding further substantiates the suspicion that the reported sequence of
RaTG13 could have been fabricated as the Spike protein encoded by this
sequence does not seem to carry the claimed function. The fact that a virus
has been fabricated to shift the attention away from ZC45/ZXC21 speaks for
an actual role of ZC45/ZXC21 in the creation of SARS-CoV-2.
D*********5
发帖数: 59
2
https://www.dimsumdaily.hk/czech-molecular-biologist-dr-sona-pekova-explains
-in-layman-terms-that-covid-19-virus-originates-from-a-lab/
g******y
发帖数: 1
3
都能懂。
Importantly, ZC45 and ZXC21 are bat coronaviruses that were discovered (
between July 2015 and February 2017), isolated, and characterized by
military research laboratories in the Third Military Medical University (
Chongqing, China) and the Research Institute for Medicine of Nanjing Command
(Nanjing, China). The data and associated work were published in 2018.
Clearly, this backbone/template, which is essential for the creation of SARS
-CoV-2, exists in these and other related research laboratories.
What strengthens our contention further is the published RaTG13 virus, the
genomic sequence of which is reportedly 96% identical to that of SARS-CoV-2.
While suggesting a natural origin of SARS-CoV-2, the RaTG13 virus also
diverted the attention of both the scientific field and the general public
away from ZC45/ZXC21. In fact, a Chinese BSL-3 lab (the Shanghai Public
Health Clinical Centre), which published a Nature article reporting a
conflicting close phylogenetic relationship between SARS-CoV-2 and ZC45/
ZXC21 rather than with RaTG13, was quickly shut down for “rectification”.
It is believed that the researchers of that laboratory were being punished
for having disclosed the SARS-CoV-2—ZC45/ZXC21 connection. On the other
hand, substantial evidence has accumulated, pointing to severe problems
associated with the reported sequence of RaTG13 as well as questioning the
actual existence of this bat virus in nature. A very recent publication also
indicated that the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the RaTG13’s Spike
protein could not bind ACE2 of two different types of horseshoe bats (they
closely relate to the horseshoe bat R. affinis, RaTG13’s alleged natural
host), implicating the inability of RaTG13 to infect horseshoe bats. This
finding further substantiates the suspicion that the reported sequence of
RaTG13 could have been fabricated as the Spike protein encoded by this
sequence does not seem to carry the claimed function. The fact that a virus
has been fabricated to shift the attention away from ZC45/ZXC21 speaks for
an actual role of ZC45/ZXC21 in the creation of SARS-CoV-2.
1 (共1页)
进入Biology版参与讨论
相关主题
我的专业方向如何写NIW的petition letter啊 (转载)Re: 跪求:大家到底怎么定题的?
Postdoc/Visiting Scholars in Arizona State University请帮忙下一篇ScienceDirect的论文
paper help: Parasitologyphylogenetic tree
求文一篇phylogenetic tree
The SARS Genome - sciencemag进化方面的书求推荐
Re: 有没有一个软件?China As Origins of Historical Plagues
[bssd] 求建议:Comparative genomics vs. NGS data analysis迷茫啊,各位给点建议吧
如何比较两颗phylogenetic tree天皇陛下也是生物猥琐男啊
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: ratg13话题: zc45话题: sars话题: zxc21话题: cov