由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
Biology版 - Olympics: Some facts about Ye Shiwen's swim
相关主题
要求撤稿的美国变态PI列表 转载
Economist报道的钱路路和Winfree的研究stower的 Ting Xie 变态么?
饶毅致《自然》杂志总编的信好奇问一下:王晓东培养了多少faculty
简单update下我们的抗议活动吧Stowers Institute for Medical Research 是个什么水平的机构啊
大家快去VoteNIBS威武……
写给Nature主编的抗议信打听一下HARVARD STEM CELL的KEVIN EGGAN?
生命之初---CSH小鼠分子胚胎课侧记(三)3.0左右的文章有没有意义? (转载)
从HHMI退下来是不是说明水平就下降了最新cell上得撤稿文章。。。为啥又是华人
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: ye话题: metre话题: olympics话题: swimmers
进入Biology版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
h******y
发帖数: 351
1
In the latest issue of Nature.
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v488/n7412/full/488459a.ht
Olympics: Some facts about Ye Shiwen's swim
Weimin Zhong,
Hao Wu
& Linheng Li
We write on behalf of the Chinese Biological Investigators Society, a
professional organization of overseas and native Chinese scientists (www.
cbisociety.org), to express our concern over your online News 'Explainer'
about the performance of Ye Shiwen, a 16-year-old Chinese swimmer who won
gold medals in the 200- and 400-metre individual medley during the London
2012 Olympics http://doi.org.mutex.gmu.edu/h55; 2012). We feel strongly that you overlooked some important facts.
You join in the widespread speculation that Ye's performance was anomalous,
in which it has generally been implied that no one else has accomplished
such a feat before without the aid of performance-enhancing drugs — a
premise that, in our view, stems from data cherry-picked to support an
unfounded accusation.
You indicate that Ye's 400-metre performance was about 7 seconds faster than
a time she set at a major meet a year earlier. Ye's personal best was
actually set in 2010, when she was 14 years old. She improved her
performance at the Olympics final by 5s over her earlier personal best — a
feat that is not anomalous, but is expected for elite swimmers of Ye's age
as they grow bigger and stronger.
COURTESY GUANGBO CHEN, STO WERS INST. FOR MED. RES.
There are many examples of elite swimmers who showed a significant
improvement at a young age. For example, Australian swimmer Ian Thorpe took
5s off his 400-metre freestyle time between the ages of 15 and 16, and UK
swimmer Adrian Moorhouse, Seoul Olympics gold medallist in 1988, improved by
4s in the 200-metre breaststroke aged 17. The same happened to the other
seven finalists in the 2012 Olympics women's 400-metre medley (see 'Young
swimmers' improvements'). Also, Rūta Meilutytė, a 15-year-old
Lithuanian swimmer, improved her personal best by more than 4% in the 100-
metre breaststroke, compared with Ye's improvement of 2% in the 400-metre
medley.
You say that Ye “raised eyebrows” by her showing in the last 50 metres of
the race, noting that she swam faster than US swimmer Ryan Lochte when he
won gold in the men's 400-metre medley, the second-fastest time ever for
that event. What you do not mention is that Ye was actually more than 23s
slower over 400metres than Lochte, an eternity for elite swimmers at this
distance.
In fact, the time for Lochte's last 50 metres is nowhere near the second-
fastest ever for that event: several other swimmers in the same men's final
were faster than he was and faster than Ye. Lochte ranked only fifth in the
last 50 metres, at 29.1s, which was significantly slower than Japan's Yuya
Horihata (27.87s) and three other swimmers competing in the same event. Ye's
time was 28.93s.
All of this information is available on the Internet. It is unfortunate that
Nature seems to have put a stamp of scientific approval on the Western
media's unsubstantiated speculation that Ye's feat is humanly impossible
without the aid of performance-enhancing drugs.
We emphasize that our data serve only to provide a more complete backdrop to
Ye's achievement, and not to negate her spectacular performance in winning
two golds and shattering the world record.
Author information
Affiliations
Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Weimin Zhong
Children's Hospital Boston, Harvard Medical School, Boston,
Massachusetts, USA.
Hao Wu
Stowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.
Linheng Li
Corresponding author
Correspondence to:
Hao Wu
D*a
发帖数: 6830
2
cong!
这些人有木有人上买买提的,发了nature过来发发包子啥的。
z*******o
发帖数: 1794
3
这种nature文章能放CV里面么?
a*****x
发帖数: 901
4
人家不会那么ws的。。。

【在 z*******o 的大作中提到】
: 这种nature文章能放CV里面么?
c****l
发帖数: 1086
5
他们三个人还缺nature paper吗?

【在 z*******o 的大作中提到】
: 这种nature文章能放CV里面么?
1 (共1页)
进入Biology版参与讨论
相关主题
最新cell上得撤稿文章。。。为啥又是华人大家快去Vote
Shrimp On Treadmills写给Nature主编的抗议信
HHMI之类的钱从哪来?生命之初---CSH小鼠分子胚胎课侧记(三)
国内引进tenure track制度不如推行院士强制退休制度从HHMI退下来是不是说明水平就下降了
要求撤稿的美国变态PI列表 转载
Economist报道的钱路路和Winfree的研究stower的 Ting Xie 变态么?
饶毅致《自然》杂志总编的信好奇问一下:王晓东培养了多少faculty
简单update下我们的抗议活动吧Stowers Institute for Medical Research 是个什么水平的机构啊
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: ye话题: metre话题: olympics话题: swimmers