n********r
发帖数: 4558 | 1 2005 RG Nadal 3:1 Federer - FF won Wimbly
2006 RG Nadal 3:1 Federer - FF won Wimbly
2007 RG Nadal 3:1 Federer - FF won Wimbly
2008 RG Nadal 3:0 Federer - Nadal won Wimbly
2010 RG Nadal 3:0 whoever - Nadal won Wimbly
2011 RG Nadal 3:1 Federer - FF win Wimbly, no? |
|
n********r
发帖数: 4558 | 2 Don't jump to conclusion too fast.
Correlation depends on how you present the data, e.g,
2005 RG Nadal 3:1 Federer - FF won Wimbly
2006 RG Nadal 3:1 Federer - FF won Wimbly
2007 RG Nadal 3:1 Federer - FF won Wimbly
2008 RG Nadal 3:0 Federer - FF did not win Wimbly
2010 RG Nadal 3:0 whoever - FF did not win Wimbly
2011 RG Nadal 3:1 Federer - FF win Wimbly, no? |
|
n********r
发帖数: 4558 | 3 Because history says FF:
2005 RG Nadal 3:1 Federer - FF won Wimbly
2006 RG Nadal 3:1 Federer - FF won Wimbly
2007 RG Nadal 3:1 Federer - FF won Wimbly
2008 RG Nadal 3:0 Federer - Nadal won Wimbly
2010 RG Nadal 3:0 whoever - Nadal won Wimbly
2011 RG Nadal 3:1 Federer - FF win Wimbly, no? |
|
w********9
发帖数: 8613 | 4 这是Shorter Oxford American English Dictionary第五版列出的与德语或者日耳曼语
相关的英语词根或词汇。
-at, suffix2. + -dom, suffix. + -ed, suffix1. + -ed, suffix2. + -en, suffix1
+ -en, suffix2 + -en, suffix5 + -en, suffix6 + -er, suffix1. + -er, suffix3
. + -er, suffix5. + -est, suffix1. + -est, suffix2. + -et, suffix2. + -eth,
suffix1. + -hood, suffix. + -ing, suffix1. + -ing, suffix3. + -ish, suffix1.
+ -kin, suffix. + -le, suffix1 + -le, suffix3 + -less, suffix. + -ling,
suffix1. + -ling, suffix2 + -ly, suffix1. + -ly, s... 阅读全帖 |
|
r****x
发帖数: 3613 | 5 这个gs很可能是AO。wimbly就算了吧，英国人没那命 |
|
a*****A
发帖数: 654 | 6 I meant in Wimbly. It seems his time won the FO without losing a single set
the whole event is gone. |
|
n********r
发帖数: 4558 | 7 I don't think so. Go check usopen 2010.
But you might be right about RG and Wimbly because they do not have night
session, therefore even top seed has to play on other court once or more. |
|
n********r
发帖数: 4558 | 8 It is ok. In RG and Wimbly even the top seed has to play on
other court at least once. because they do not have night sessions. |
|
L****n
发帖数: 12932 | 9 back to back winning French open and Wimbledon will cement Li Na's position
as tennis great instantly. men or women.
Li has good 1st serve. baseline game is solid, even though not a big hitter,
her power is more consistent. Now she has come through the mental "winning
a slam" barrier, i think she will be a favorite next month in London. |
|
n********r
发帖数: 4558 | 10 on men's side:
Borg did it 78-80
Nadal 2008, 2010
Federer 2009
not sure about women
position
hitter,
winning |
|
c*****n
发帖数: 14445 | 11 Graff made it several times |
|
n********r
发帖数: 4558 | 12 The only one who can stop Djoker to claim No1 after Wimbly is
Federer. |
|
n********r
发帖数: 4558 | 13 He did not compete at Wimbly in his earlier years
(88-90?) because he did not want to follow the dress code. |
|
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 15 This one is a little bit stretchy, more like 赚取眼球。
e.g., FF won 2005 and 2006 Wimby has almost nothing to do with
Nadal's FO. 相关系数接近0。
Year 2009 was missing, while 2010 is listed.
The only 靠铺 years are 2007, 2008. Just twice. |
|
t****7
发帖数: 11132 | 16 Conclusion: Nadal vs History, no? |
|
d**f
发帖数: 293 | 17 very scientific. I love it :) |
|
|
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 20 I don't see any essential difference.
As I said, it's a good way to present the data, but I wouldn't
bet my money on conclusions drawn from a presentation.
To me, 2007 and 2008 are statistically significant. The others,
close to random.
For example, FF would have won 2005 and 2006, no matter what
Nadal did in the FO those two years. FF was invincible. FF would
not have won 2010, no matter what Nadal did in FO that year. FF
was too weak and Nadal was too strong... |
|
b**********s
发帖数: 9531 | 21 it's better lz put real money to bet on FF, then let's what happens. |
|
|
B****n
发帖数: 11290 | 23 也不是沒有參考價值 至少說明了一些兩週前兩人的狀態對比 還是對預測溫布頓有
參考價值的 |
|
|
n********r
发帖数: 4558 | 25 There is no tiebreak in the deciding set for AO, RG and Wimbly
Only USOpen uses tiebreak in the deciding set. |
|
n********r
发帖数: 4558 | 26 What's her performance last year at Wimbly? |
|
n********r
发帖数: 4558 | 27 Nadal won last year's Wimbly.
For ranking point details, please visit www.atptennis.com |
|
n********r
发帖数: 4558 | 28 Federer, who is on the ATP Player Council, said it was a matter of "who
believes what," but Simon cannot and should not be so simply dismissed,
however, because now as a fellow member of the player council, he is not
just a guy with a point of view, but a figure of authority. His opinion is
not just a personal thought, but one that because of his position, carries
power. He is in the position of representing male players.
http://espn.go.com/tennis/wimbledon12/story/_/id/8106661/wimble |
|
|
|
b********t
发帖数: 992 | 31 然气量太小，要不是METALLICA，NAPSTER就不会早早完蛋
混
网
进
日
之星”，这一切似乎都说明Lars将子承父业，向成为体育明星的道路迈进。但就在1973年
，
在
球
之
路。值得一提的是，Lars最终还是到了Wimbledon的体育场，不过不是参加著名的Wimbled
Metal)兴起，Lars对
过
和
乐
是
在
高中时期，James就组织过一支名为Obsession的摇滚乐队。James在旧杂志上发现了Lars
的广告，并且找到了他，两人一见如故，立即着手组织乐队。他们首先找到了James在Obs
寻
同
奏
量
发
了
新
巡
并
。
，
队
尽 |
|
a*******l
发帖数: 2353 | 32 你的原创？
混
网
进
日
之星”，这一切似乎都说明Lars将子承父业，向成为体育明星的道路迈进。但就在1973年
，
在
球
之
路。值得一提的是，Lars最终还是到了Wimbledon的体育场，不过不是参加著名的Wimbled
Metal)兴起，Lars对
过
和
乐
是
在
高中时期，James就组织过一支名为Obsession的摇滚乐队。James在旧杂志上发现了Lars
的广告，并且找到了他，两人一见如故，立即着手组织乐队。他们首先找到了James在Obs
寻
同
奏
量
发
了
新
巡
并
。
，
队
尽 |
|
L****g
发帖数: 155 | 33 我原来大学时候的同学是Metallica 的tribute band.
鼓手...他们现在自己作去已经出了个DEBUT了!
我是好多年前被介绍着听的.
底
名
始
明
之星”，这一切似乎都说明Lars将子承父业，向成为体育明星的道路迈进。但就在1973年
后
于
网
乐
路。值得一提的是，Lars最终还是到了Wimbledon的体育场，不过不是参加著名的Wimbled
通
找
音
时
，
高中时期，James就组织过一支名为Obsession的摇滚乐队。James在旧杂志上发现了Lars
的广告，并且找到了他，两人一见如故，立即着手组织乐队。他们首先找到了James在Obs
在 |
|
