由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
Tennis版 - History says FF win Wimbly
相关主题
Wimbledon ranking watch (Rafa, Djoker, Federer) (转载)FF 已经在facebook上加Darcis为好友了
Nadal 100% ChampionFF夺12冠用了5年,Nadal用了9年。
Federer H2H Nadal 7:14Djoker is on fire
Nadal has better chance than Federer now版聚
纳达尔堪忧啊Finally Federer figures out Nadal
ESPN Experts' Picks & Predictions For WimbledonFederer vs. Nadal
小德已经变No.1了吗伟大的对手!为Federer和Nadal欢呼!
federe is GOAT has nothing to do with Rafal Nadal before nadal gets more slam titles大家可以不可以在吵架之前发表个共识?
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: nadal话题: ff话题: wimbly话题: rg话题: federer
1 (共1页)
n********r
发帖数: 4558
1
2005 RG Nadal 3:1 Federer - FF won Wimbly
2006 RG Nadal 3:1 Federer - FF won Wimbly
2007 RG Nadal 3:1 Federer - FF won Wimbly
2008 RG Nadal 3:0 Federer - Nadal won Wimbly
2010 RG Nadal 3:0 whoever - Nadal won Wimbly
2011 RG Nadal 3:1 Federer - FF win Wimbly, no?
e******r
发帖数: 327
2
Yes.
Good prediction.
K****D
发帖数: 30533
3
This one is a little bit stretchy, more like 赚取眼球。
e.g., FF won 2005 and 2006 Wimby has almost nothing to do with
Nadal's FO. 相关系数接近0。
Year 2009 was missing, while 2010 is listed.
The only 靠铺 years are 2007, 2008. Just twice.

【在 n********r 的大作中提到】
: 2005 RG Nadal 3:1 Federer - FF won Wimbly
: 2006 RG Nadal 3:1 Federer - FF won Wimbly
: 2007 RG Nadal 3:1 Federer - FF won Wimbly
: 2008 RG Nadal 3:0 Federer - Nadal won Wimbly
: 2010 RG Nadal 3:0 whoever - Nadal won Wimbly
: 2011 RG Nadal 3:1 Federer - FF win Wimbly, no?

t****7
发帖数: 11132
4
Conclusion: Nadal vs History, no?

【在 n********r 的大作中提到】
: 2005 RG Nadal 3:1 Federer - FF won Wimbly
: 2006 RG Nadal 3:1 Federer - FF won Wimbly
: 2007 RG Nadal 3:1 Federer - FF won Wimbly
: 2008 RG Nadal 3:0 Federer - Nadal won Wimbly
: 2010 RG Nadal 3:0 whoever - Nadal won Wimbly
: 2011 RG Nadal 3:1 Federer - FF win Wimbly, no?

n********r
发帖数: 4558
5
Don't jump to conclusion too fast.
Correlation depends on how you present the data, e.g,
2005 RG Nadal 3:1 Federer - FF won Wimbly
2006 RG Nadal 3:1 Federer - FF won Wimbly
2007 RG Nadal 3:1 Federer - FF won Wimbly
2008 RG Nadal 3:0 Federer - FF did not win Wimbly
2010 RG Nadal 3:0 whoever - FF did not win Wimbly
2011 RG Nadal 3:1 Federer - FF win Wimbly, no?

【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: This one is a little bit stretchy, more like 赚取眼球。
: e.g., FF won 2005 and 2006 Wimby has almost nothing to do with
: Nadal's FO. 相关系数接近0。
: Year 2009 was missing, while 2010 is listed.
: The only 靠铺 years are 2007, 2008. Just twice.

d**f
发帖数: 293
6
very scientific. I love it :)

【在 n********r 的大作中提到】
: Don't jump to conclusion too fast.
: Correlation depends on how you present the data, e.g,
: 2005 RG Nadal 3:1 Federer - FF won Wimbly
: 2006 RG Nadal 3:1 Federer - FF won Wimbly
: 2007 RG Nadal 3:1 Federer - FF won Wimbly
: 2008 RG Nadal 3:0 Federer - FF did not win Wimbly
: 2010 RG Nadal 3:0 whoever - FF did not win Wimbly
: 2011 RG Nadal 3:1 Federer - FF win Wimbly, no?

b**k
发帖数: 11850
7
who's whoever?

【在 n********r 的大作中提到】
: 2005 RG Nadal 3:1 Federer - FF won Wimbly
: 2006 RG Nadal 3:1 Federer - FF won Wimbly
: 2007 RG Nadal 3:1 Federer - FF won Wimbly
: 2008 RG Nadal 3:0 Federer - Nadal won Wimbly
: 2010 RG Nadal 3:0 whoever - Nadal won Wimbly
: 2011 RG Nadal 3:1 Federer - FF win Wimbly, no?

w********r
发帖数: 1397
8
Birdman.

【在 b**k 的大作中提到】
: who's whoever?
K****D
发帖数: 30533
9
I don't see any essential difference.
As I said, it's a good way to present the data, but I wouldn't
bet my money on conclusions drawn from a presentation.
To me, 2007 and 2008 are statistically significant. The others,
close to random.
For example, FF would have won 2005 and 2006, no matter what
Nadal did in the FO those two years. FF was invincible. FF would
not have won 2010, no matter what Nadal did in FO that year. FF
was too weak and Nadal was too strong...

【在 n********r 的大作中提到】
: Don't jump to conclusion too fast.
: Correlation depends on how you present the data, e.g,
: 2005 RG Nadal 3:1 Federer - FF won Wimbly
: 2006 RG Nadal 3:1 Federer - FF won Wimbly
: 2007 RG Nadal 3:1 Federer - FF won Wimbly
: 2008 RG Nadal 3:0 Federer - FF did not win Wimbly
: 2010 RG Nadal 3:0 whoever - FF did not win Wimbly
: 2011 RG Nadal 3:1 Federer - FF win Wimbly, no?

b**********s
发帖数: 9531
10
it's better lz put real money to bet on FF, then let's what happens.
d******n
发帖数: 12850
11
soderling

【在 w********r 的大作中提到】
: Birdman.
B****n
发帖数: 11290
12
也不是沒有參考價值 至少說明了一些兩週前兩人的狀態對比 還是對預測溫布頓有
參考價值的

【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: This one is a little bit stretchy, more like 赚取眼球。
: e.g., FF won 2005 and 2006 Wimby has almost nothing to do with
: Nadal's FO. 相关系数接近0。
: Year 2009 was missing, while 2010 is listed.
: The only 靠铺 years are 2007, 2008. Just twice.

n*********e
发帖数: 25274
13
男单再没新人出来,真要玩玩儿了.
1 (共1页)
相关主题
大家可以不可以在吵架之前发表个共识?纳达尔堪忧啊
迟到的温网决赛一点观感。ESPN Experts' Picks & Predictions For Wimbledon
奥运日记8/13 (2)小德已经变No.1了吗
再来乌鸦一下federe is GOAT has nothing to do with Rafal Nadal before nadal gets more slam titles
Wimbledon ranking watch (Rafa, Djoker, Federer) (转载)FF 已经在facebook上加Darcis为好友了
Nadal 100% ChampionFF夺12冠用了5年,Nadal用了9年。
Federer H2H Nadal 7:14Djoker is on fire
Nadal has better chance than Federer now版聚
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: nadal话题: ff话题: wimbly话题: rg话题: federer