D******n
发帖数: 2836 | 1 because sas didnt intend to have any logic in the first place, its logic was
just line by line processing. As more and more ppl used SAS and ppl asked f
or more and more functionalities , SAS developers just keep adding those wei
rd syntax/logic to SAS, just like patches.
one example is , you have firstobs in data step, but you dont have lastobs,
because obs= is it!
Why? because SAS developers first added obs=, as users wanted to print first
couple of lines, and then ppl wanted to get started no |
|
P*******s
发帖数: 1777 | 2 【 以下文字转载自 Seattle 讨论区 】
发信人: Pokertars (缘起为空), 信区: Seattle
标 题: 投诉: 西雅图地区版主不制止PA还鼓励性的回贴支持 (转载)
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Fri Jun 1 14:32:33 2012, 美东)
发信人: Pokertars (缘起为空), 信区: Complain
标 题: 投诉: 西雅图地区版主不制止PA还鼓励性的回贴支持
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Fri Jun 1 13:33:25 2012, 美东)
投诉人(ID):
Pokertars
投诉对象及职务(限版主）:
西雅图地区版主sonofagun (止戈为武)
投诉标题:
不制止PA还鼓励性的回贴支持
投诉目标(更改处理决定/更改板规/弹劾板主...):
弹劾板主
投诉理由及证据:
西雅图地区版主sonofagun (止戈为武)不制止PA还鼓励性的回贴支持
http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t/Seattle/32474429.html
发信人: ja94 (世上最幸福的人-- taliban的妻子),... 阅读全帖 |
|
s*******w
发帖数: 1879 | 3 这四个问题，除了最后一个，我觉得其它的三个都是坑。
从最后一个开始，我觉得她可能就是好奇随便问一下，但是你感觉没有直接回答她诶，
你说了你是你家的single child么？不过不说也没啥，只是直接跳到爷爷奶奶辈有点怪
。ps，你家相比我家，就是爷爷奶奶那辈，也大好多啊，绝对big family啊。
剩下三个哈，第一个问题你居然完全没准备？why quit research and do medicine这
个300％我们这种都会被问到啊。不过说实话，我自己都不知道这个到底怎么回答是个
好回答，我觉得可能要看到时候我面前坐的是谁，还有我们每个人自身的情况。说实话
，我倒是没被医学院面试过，但是其它的神马volunteer啊这种都老被问，最变态的一
次，是劳资刚刚坐下来就被对方问，well, why do you wanna be a doctor? you are
already a doctor. 当时心中顿时万只草泥马奔腾把对面碧池的家人依此默默问候了一
遍。但是还是笑著回答了一些有的没的。
我脚得，这个问题基本上，如果你拿临床跟科研比较，管他是comparison还是contra... 阅读全帖 |
|
j**4
发帖数: 10425 | 4 my parents told me my grandpa died
my parents want to buy an apt, and i need to contribute money. the money i
dont really have right now because i want to buy a condo myself
thought i got a dream condo at a super sweet price, only to have the owner
negate the binder and lost out...
layoffs at work. 2 ppl in my team got laid off, from what used to be a 7
ppl team, to now 5 ppl... the closest to lay off i ever come, the guy sits
right next to me...
i broke off with the dude. we've been togethe... 阅读全帖 |
|
f*****g
发帖数: 15860 | 5 yes, it is, but it's basically a losing strategy.
1) you're not going to win enough (to cover other losing hands) with
premium hands, because you force ppl out early most of time;
2) you're likely to get more "bad beats" when ppl do call you and you two
are both early committed. your emotion will be affected once you get beat,
and start to loosen up and lose more;
3) after a while, ppl will know that you're very predictable, in poker,
nothing is worse than being predictable. in poker, especially |
|
y********n
发帖数: 2063 | 6 Sound not correct enough. If 1200 ppl into the game, 150 ppl into the money.
everyone has 3000 starting chips, you need at least 12k chips to into the
money. 28k chip is the average.
allin in later stage with short stack is very hard. PPl will call u with
anything. ak can not hold. and surely, better hand will call u.
the bubble play is very hard for short stack.
甚至什么都不打------it can not garantee you with a healthy stack to steal blinds, and even harder to get deep enough of MTT. The 18th get aro |
|
s**g
发帖数: 3271 | 7 hispital make money on ppl with insurance
lost money on ppl without insurance (and not pay)
so market think it's good for their business when more ppl have insurance (
hospital shares jump today) |
|
s**g
发帖数: 3271 | 8 it's very hard to see the impact of the bill without it really running
high cost can be address in several aspects
1) more ppl have insurance, so hopital end up paying less for uninsured care
, so it can charge less
2) more ppl in the insurance pool, so care cost is shared more broadly, in
turn reduce premium rising speed
3) gov will set up health insurance exhcnage, so small business can shop
around for insurance, and they can pool more ppl together, in turn to reduce
premium..
4) when premium |
|
h*****d
发帖数: 112 | 9 Depends on ppls. NPR is very difficult to convince ppls who are not in
graphics area but smart in other cs areas. I think this year, there are some
NPR PhDs try to find faculty position in graphics. But it is really difficult
lah. It can not convince many ppl. It is hard to evaluate the result. As an
area, this is one of the weakest points. |
|
i******e
发帖数: 410 | 10 lalalala...we are waiting for ur story ne...
60% ppl think u should post at least 1 per day...
and other 40% ppl think u should post at least 100 per day...
ppl's eyes are bright ya |
|
s***y
发帖数: 31 | 11 i dont get it. why is it always the superificial ppl who are happy?
maybe it's like what they say...look pretty and be happy?
XYZ: sigh
XYZ: i dont know
XYZ: all thse superficial ppl seem happy
ABC: yes they r
ABC: that's y
ABC: i' m saying
ABC: i can show u
ABC: how to be happy
ABC: then u'll live that way
ABC: and stop thinking y u don't like these ugly guys
ABC: or fobby ppl
ABC: just go clubbing with a few pretty girls and stare other girls down
ABC: get really drunk and dance
ABC: and that |
|
o****y
发帖数: 26355 | 12 Well, if you say that about your parents.
You guys are too young, don't understand the hard life of that generation.
The lives were too hard in 1988 for most of ppl. Ppl just used students
movement to show how unhappy they were. |
|
o****y
发帖数: 26355 | 13 I just don't have Chinese input here.
If your parents were ver satisfy with what TG did in 1988, then your family
was a minority la. China had been a low price society for a long time.
Ppl just saw what inflation meant for the first time.
Not many ppl could used to it. |
|
o****y
发帖数: 26355 | 14 Of course, they did not have the right to prevent ppl to go study.
They did prevent ppl doing that, but if you just went in, they could not
nothing about it, just shouted some dirty words. |
|
c********g
发帖数: 15629 | 15 I noticed an interesting phenomenon:
Many senior ppl are against Mr. Fang, like ooo and me (bbs ID).
Many junior ppl are supporting him (who only posted a few hundred at mitbbs)
.
Senior: >= 35 years old with lots of social experience.
Junior: < 35 still in school with beautiful ideas about future.
BTW, I am very very familiar with the stories in Great Culture Revolution (
GCR). From what Mr. Fang did/does/ is doing/will do, I see GCR again.
Just made $200 in last few minutes. :-) Now time to r... 阅读全帖 |
|
c********g
发帖数: 15629 | 16 But Fang Fans do not like to 监督和评判方舟子.
Even worse, many of these Fans do not allow other ppl to 监督和评判方舟子.
That's why you see so much ridiculous speech here to support him.
Of course 方舟子 does not like other ppl to 监督和评判 him. He can judge others, but others do not have rights to judge him according to his standard.
My conclusion has not changed: Fang is a snake now.
A snake can not only eat rats and frog, but also bite human being. |
|
o****y
发帖数: 26355 | 17 I think most ppl know that. What can you do?
Ppl tried communism and failed badly. |
|
c********g
发帖数: 15629 | 18 Now many ppl stand up to 打方舟子.
These ppl are 柳州子，王肘子. 互相打 |
|
g*********r
发帖数: 9366 | 19 ☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
coarsening (草枯鹰眼疾，雪尽马蹄轻) 于 (Sun Jan 1 00:19:46 2012, 美东) 提到:
http://zgrx.freeforums.org/topic-t35.html
方舟子与陈章良
对绝大多数海外学人来说，陈章良是一个耳熟能详的名字。这不仅仅是因为他是中国留
学生中回国时间较早（1987年）、回国之后地位上升得最快（1989年任北大正教授、
1992年起任北大生物系主任、生命科学院院长、1995年任北大副校长）、名气大得惊人
的一位人物，更是因为关于这个人的传闻一直不绝于耳。这是一些什么样的传闻呢？方
舟子曾在2000年12月16日专门就此撰写了一篇文章，题为《为什么不把陈章良立此存照
？》，其中说：
“目前网上对陈章良的指责主要有四点（估计都来源于《华夏文摘》几年前登过的一篇
攻击谈家祯、陈章良的文章，那篇文章充满不实之词，极不负责任）：
一、陈章良抄袭。
二、陈章良伪造恐龙蛋基因研究。
三、陈章良生活作风有问题。
四、陈章良学术成果太少。
对后面两点，... 阅读全帖 |
|
o****y
发帖数: 26355 | 20 Young ppl are not happy anywhere they go la.
If they stay in China, they will hate TG.
The life is too hard for the young ppl today. |
|
l****n
发帖数: 829 | 21 well, I have defined ppl who have regular job will retire with 401k. You
keep arguing on the basis there are ppl w/o 401k, of course, it could be
true, but do they work on a legal basis for 30 years? |
|
o****y
发帖数: 26355 | 22 The leftists are the ppl who are have the sympathy to the poor and the weak.
or the ppl who are the poor and the weak. |
|
o****y
发帖数: 26355 | 23 If the dictatorship can make ppl rich, ppl won't care about democracy la. |
|
s******g
发帖数: 15854 | 24 Nobody gives a shit what 西方 talk about or think about. The truth is, your
so called 中国模式 is sucking the wealth of average ppl in China and in last
15 years ppl I know get zero improvement in their life, if not getting
worse. Do you have any poposal to change that? Don't just pack those big
terms together, that can't make a sense out of nothing. |
|
o****y
发帖数: 26355 | 25 No. Even TG won't pay them. TG just want to ppl forget 64. TG rather
pay ppl not to talk about it. |
|
o****y
发帖数: 26355 | 26 Were we living in the same country and watch the same TV in China in 1989?
Before 64 even after 64, CCTV was controlled by those ppl who sympathized
to students. All the reports were how many went to street to demonstrate
and how many ppl supported students.
You misremembered the time, that was after 6/10, PLA took over CCTV,
then all those what you described were shown day and night. |
|
o****y
发帖数: 26355 | 27 There is not just US, ppl in other democracies also are treated more equal
than ppl in China. |
|
o****y
发帖数: 26355 | 28 But the number of unsatisfied ppl is very important.
At least, you can not make majority of ppl unsatisfied. |
|
o****y
发帖数: 26355 | 29 Then you still need increase ppl's salaries first ah.
Now the problem is how to increase ppl's salary and at the same time,
the labor is still cheap to attack the factories. |
|
o****y
发帖数: 26355 | 30 It is not ppl's choice. Since TG is in power, ppl have no other choices. |
|
o****y
发帖数: 26355 | 31 That was more than 60 years ago. I never said TG was not ppl's choice at
that time. But since then TG did not give any chance to let ppl to choose. |
|
o****y
发帖数: 26355 | 32 Those old ppl are last generation la. I don't see today's young ppl can
live that long. |
|
o****y
发帖数: 26355 | 33 The birth rate has a lot to do with the economy and the cost of raising kids.
In 70s, China economy situation was not good, not many ppl wanted to have
more kids even without the family planning. After 80s, young ppl get married
in late 20s and early 30s. That reason along can reduce the birth rate.
Now even Chinese government abolish the family planning policy, not many
young couple will want to have more than one kid. |
|
d******g
发帖数: 6966 | 34 who gives a shit about political correctness...fuck all poor ppl in the
US ... as simple as that ..i would rather burn my money than giving them
to those fucking poor ppl in the US. |
|
s*********t
发帖数: 1663 | 35 to some ppl it's not tricky at all, and that's why exam is designed to selec
t the smartest ppl.
gre math problems can only select non-retards |
|
o****y
发帖数: 26355 | 36 At least I did not say TG must step down. Let ppl to have choices. If ppl
choose TG, I am not against that. |
|
o****y
发帖数: 26355 | 37 But Chinese ppl definitely need demoracy eduation ah.
Not many ppl will believe it will benifit them. |
|
o****y
发帖数: 26355 | 38 Why PLA does not agree ah. The government can promise them more money.
If foreigners bribe, how much money they need spend ah. It is very
risking business, the money spend, not guranteed your ppl can be elected.
As for Li, even more joke la. You really believe Chinese ppl will elect
him? |
|
o****y
发帖数: 26355 | 39 TG designed a very clever system.
The ppl representive system is a four level system.
what ppl can direct elected is the lowest level representives, the district
representive.
The only purpose of the district representives is to elect the representives
of the city level.
The city level representives then elect province level representive.
The province level representives can elect national representives.
After all this processes, your rights are diluted |
|
e*******o
发帖数: 2271 | 40 Because you chose them.
That's a good way to prevent uprising, and keep harmony.
When it ends up well, you become US, when it goes wrong, but ppl still
believe it, you become India. When ppl r really fed up, they will choose
dictators again and you get African/S. American shitty countries.
For social problems, It won't solve anything unless you solve it, but it
does give you more time to solve (or not solve) it. |
|
o****y
发帖数: 26355 | 41 Americans are not that concerned about China la.
Many of those vent on the internet are FQ just like FQ in China.
What I am trying to say is that if China becomes a better country, you
do not need change their minds. They will change their minds themselves.
The reason I am here is not for changing other ppl's opinions. Just want to
know
what other ppl's opinions are. |
|
o****y
发帖数: 26355 | 42 I believe ppl belong to different class, but I don't believe that, ppl in
different classes can not exist in hormany, must be one step on others' dead
bodies. |
|
o****y
发帖数: 26355 | 43 Young ppl don't know much la. Their parents were the ppl strongly against it. |
|
o****y
发帖数: 26355 | 44 Not majority ppl la. Some ppl in western country also believe in Communism
la. |
|
o****y
发帖数: 26355 | 45 If you believe today's ppls' lives in China are much better than 70s.
You are more than half Dengists.
Maoists biggest issue against TG is that they believe today many ppl live
misery lives in China. |
|
o****y
发帖数: 26355 | 46 The world is a jungle. The democracy only can be within its own borders ah.
What we need is that a government to be fair and justice to its own ppl.
for other countries' ppl, you can just try your best la. |
|
o****y
发帖数: 26355 | 47 OK, if TG is making ppl happy, then it can be in power ah.
Whether TG is in power or not, I don't care.
I just want to see ppl happy ah. |
|
o****y
发帖数: 26355 | 48 Many young ppl in China don't know who he is.
Now many of young ppl in China know him la. |
|
o****y
发帖数: 26355 | 49 How do I know. I don't think ppl background have anything to do with ppl's
opinion. It is most likely influlenced by the main thoughts in his/her
generations. |
|
o****y
发帖数: 26355 | 50 Some ppl want spend money to make more money. Some ppl are just pretty happy
for earning some money without spending it to make more. |
|
