|
r*****y
发帖数: 507 | 2 I think it can be called "bad luck". it is not normal. |
|
r*****y
发帖数: 507 | 3 only 3 reviewers, each has 1/3 weight, a "5" is too heavy. |
|
O******Y
发帖数: 88 | 4 That is very true. Too many submissions for vision conferences. So it is too
difficult to increase the number of reviewers...
cvpr |
|
S*********r
发帖数: 4729 | 5 My paper this time got a 5, really don't understand what that guy is
expecting to see from vision research. Our nice idea was then killed without
mercy.
cvpr |
|
T**********n
发帖数: 480 | 6 剩下的两个reviewer给了什么？
或者是不是你老板和人结过梁子？ |
|
O******Y
发帖数: 88 | 7 That is called "good luck". It is not normal too.
114
域? |
|
S*********r
发帖数: 4729 | 8 Just wrote the rebuttal, hope they don't feel our tone is too strong. We
only hope it is in next CVPR anyway.
without
in |
|
O******Y
发帖数: 88 | 9 According to my experience, it is not helpful to have a strong tone. For last
CVPR, the comments from the area chair clearly said he did not like the strong
tone in our rebuttal and so the rebuttal was not taken into account. So be
careful.
a |
|
T**********n
发帖数: 480 | 10 这年头发个paper都得卑躬屈膝察言观色的，没劲，没前途呀 |
|
S*********r
发帖数: 4729 | 11 I was saying "I hope they don't feel...", because we give a rebuttal in a
very confident way. :( But I thank for your reminding again.
last
strong
is
the
papers |
|
O******Y
发帖数: 88 | 12 sigh. life is not easy.
last
strong
We |
|
|
O******Y
发帖数: 88 | 14 hehe. first bitter, then sweet... |
|
v******d
发帖数: 1322 | 15 发paper混饭吃还不如去编程，编程至少编得好就是好，
没有什么reviewer |
|
r*****y
发帖数: 507 | 16 customers are reviewers,
managers/directors are reviewers. |
|
w***f
发帖数: 75 | 17 正经公司把 Source code check in 到 main source tree 前都是要过一道
code reviewer 的。 |
|
ie
发帖数: 1350 | 18 sign, same here
mine is also 2,3,3, keep finger corssed |
|
v******d
发帖数: 1322 | 19 这种review不会很BT吧，应该是有比较客观的标准，
不会有价值评判 |
|
ie
发帖数: 1350 | 20 u got it
he is in MSRAsia right now
and his group has around 17 papers in ICCV2005, 9 of them have his name |
|
p*****s
发帖数: 8 | 21 Oh my goodness !!!
paper factory... |
|
a***r
发帖数: 35 | 22
yes
I think they are more demanding |
|
|
v******d
发帖数: 1322 | 24 demanding,but not rejection,only improving |
|
S*********r
发帖数: 4729 | 25 To my knowledge, ICCV won't be so low this year too.
They will keep the acceptance rate at the same level, but increasing the
number of accepted paper. Just like what they did for CVPR 2005. |
|
|
b*******s
发帖数: 14 | 27 ICCV是两年一次的，同时最近几年欧洲的ECCV（也是两年一次）影响也越来越大。 |
|
r*****y
发帖数: 507 | 28 that's enough. :) don't always think about siggraph.
let we think about another way.
in graphics,
siggraph accepted 90 papers, and the top ten graphics conferences/symposium (including siggraph) totally accepted less than TOTAL 450 papers annually.
and look at other fields, for example, computer vision.
top (ICCV or EECV + CVPR) accepted more than 500 papers each year (about 100 oral totally), so their oral = siggraph papers.
and second tire vision conf (ICPR, ACCV, etc.) accpeted other more tha |
|
g********g
发帖数: 11 | 29 This depends on the area.
In some area such as vision, the poster paper has the same length as the
regular paper. Actually there is no difference when you submit a paper (like
to CVPR, ICCV etc.). |
|
|
p*****w
发帖数: 429 | 31 thanks u all
for all, iccv is of the most importance, right? |
|
w****a
发帖数: 186 | 32 iccv and cvpr are equally important, in my opinion... |
|
F**p
发帖数: 1046 | 33 maybe CVPR is hotter now. ICCV was used to very good. |
|
b*******s
发帖数: 14 | 34 don't think so. if only consider computer vision,
ICCV and ECCV should be better than CVPR. |
|
l******e
发帖数: 153 | 35 My rank is
CVPR,ICCV > ECCV > BMVC,WACV > ACCV,ICASSP,ICIP,ICPR |
|
l******e
发帖数: 153 | 36 I know ICASSP is good for speech. However, for vision, as far as I know, there
is a lot of vision guys publish papers there, and it seems quite easy (accept
rate is around 50, if not above).
I think you are right, I should also include SIGGRAPH, and NIPS, it should be
like
CVPR,ICCV,SIGGRAPH,NIPS > ECCV > BMVC,WACV > ACCV,ICASSP,ICIP,ICPR
BTW, I don't think image=vision, they have different focus, though overlapped
quite some. |
|
c*********g
发帖数: 154 | 37 可以看05年CVPR（或者是ICCV，记不清了）上的一篇基于快速level set算法来做跟踪
的论文，写得挺清楚 |
|
e*******e
发帖数: 1144 | 38 Just sample some research areas related to AI and machine learning:
1) Computer vision, pattern recognition in image or video (in CVPR, ICCV)
2) Data mining, e.g., data streams, graph mining, anomaly detection (in KDD)
3) Web mining, text mining, information retrieval (in SIGIR, WWW)
4) Natural language processing (in EMNLP, ACL)
In your opinion, which are more promising in the near future (<10 years)
1) For an industry career (more demands from companies)
2) For an academic career (more faculty |
|
R********n
发帖数: 519 | 39 Appreciate it, thank you:). Yeah, I also feel it is important to focus on a
specific area now. For paper, some conf. like ICML, all papers are oral, but
ICCV, just few (50 among 200 accepted papers), so it is hard to get a oral
paper, I will try:) |
|
d******e
发帖数: 7844 | 40 Wireless不了解，你Learning的文章马马虎虎。
ICIP也就是Rank3+，ICCV的Workshop最多算rank 3。
4年研究不短了，赶紧弄点Top Conference。不然很难混 |
|
R********n
发帖数: 519 | 41 Thank you for your rely:), rank 3+ means strong than rank 3?
In vision area, ICCV is top 1, ICIP rank 2, yeah, seems it is different with
learning area
Yeah, I need top conference, thanks:) |
|
R********n
发帖数: 519 | 42 PR is more easy and fast than TIP and TNN, super zan, this information is
important:). Yeah, I have interest on manifold learning, also for transfer
learning
and sparse representations. I will prefer combine the research with vision
together, since I think that NIPS and ICML is harder than ICCV, ECCV and
CVPR |
|
d******e
发帖数: 7844 | 43 你没看清楚我说的话，ICCV是Rank 1，但是他的Workshop最多算Rank 3。
Workshop和Conference可是两码事。
ICIP是一个盛会，以前的实验室有个水平马马虎虎的师兄一次能中3篇。
我不觉得作为Vision的会议，ICIP就进入Rank2了
with |
|
v***0
发帖数: 5096 | 44 这个publication不行啊，很多刚申请出来的都比这个强多了。
要做vision和learning的话
iccv, cvpr, eccv 至少得有一两篇；
nips, icml，aaai, ijcai 也至少得有个篇把
然后journal再弄点。 |
|
m****s
发帖数: 402 | 45 CV+ML is not an easy area now. You need papers on,
1) CV --> CVPR/ICCV/ECCV/SIGGRAPH/ACMMM+IJCV/PAMI
2) AI&ML --> AAAI/IJCAI/KDD/SIGIR/ICML/NIPS ...
Even IEEE journals and other decent journaks like PR/CVIU are 2nd rank. |
|
s*****g
发帖数: 5159 | 46 如果只有2-3篇stoc/focs，或者iccv/cvpr oral，或者siggraph，或者signcomm/
mobicomm，也差不多了。 |
|
v****s
发帖数: 1112 | 47 now he turned to journal....
well, cvpr is just tie2 conf.... he had iccv too, which is tie1 ! |
|
n*s
发帖数: 599 | 48 iccv用得着 叹号么，要是有个nature science的你不就得用叹号扫屏了
至于那句关于cvpr的就懒得说你了 |
|
g***o
发帖数: 230 | 49 don't know much about either of them, but iccv is kind of treated as tier 2
in our lab |
|
p*******r
发帖数: 475 | 50 呃，没发过CVPR/ICCV/ECCV么？CVIU的档次还是略低了一点啊。
．９ |
|
