k*********t
发帖数: 2999 | 1 I think I know who you are referring to. The weird thing is that he got
several orals for almost the same techniques. But sometimes we have to agree
that some people are really good at writing papers. Good networking is also
important.
papers
paper.
豪啊
科专
点） |
|
k*********t
发帖数: 2999 | 2 from someone's showoff. :-)
He
自
纯
光 |
|
r**t
发帖数: 937 | 3 道理很简单，学生多，好学生多，老板的paper就多。大牛学生一年贡献两篇CVPR，
小牛学生一篇，如果手下有那么四五个，嘿嘿....... |
|
r**t
发帖数: 937 | 4 bioinformatics很热，一方面做的人少，一方面做生物的人和做计算机的人互相都
不精通，能把对方的领域懂一点点就能做bioinformatics的小牛了。不过现在扑上
来的人也不少了，包括做统计的，这么下去迟早又是一个泡沫。
网络安全外国人很难做，没办法的事～～ |
|
l**l
发帖数: 860 | 5 大牛学生除了每年两片cvpr 是不是顺带还噼里啪啦的写一些其他文章?
(非一稿多投) |
|
k*********t
发帖数: 2999 | 6 how about a bull student publishing 5 papers at once.
considered
so
had 7
and
papers
had
many |
|
X*****r
发帖数: 2521 | 7 Oh,I can too.
But 5 pages |
|
X*****r
发帖数: 2521 | 8 I am only publish on Joke Board |
|
|
r**t
发帖数: 937 | 10 probably most vision papers are junks
ppl are waiting for a break through |
|
m*******y
发帖数: 48 | 11 客气点说你是mean，不客气点说你是无知无畏，
有本事你也灌7篇junk到CVPR！包括三个oral。 |
|
e******y
发帖数: 15 | 12 我也听说这几个paper比较一般般，颇有灌水之嫌，oral的哪几片好像反响也一般，
当然对普通人已经够牛了，对牛人要高要求。 |
|
e******y
发帖数: 15 | 13 //cft, 不要激动，即便都是水，也有纯净水和矿泉水的分别。
俺不懂，瞎说瞎说。 |
|
m*******y
发帖数: 48 | 14 vision这个行当现在停滞不前，除非谁做点划时代的成果出来，或者从别的地方来
点崭新的应用需求，要不大家就这么不死不活地挖点边角余料过活吧。 |
|
x***j
发帖数: 109 | 15 people have different styles. some like watering a lot and making things
appear working. the others like working on real things. nothing wrong on both
sides. just different focuses on research.
considered
make so
had
and |
|
s*****s
发帖数: 27 | 16 several of the group members have won prize in the Math Modelling Contest. |
|
x***j
发帖数: 109 | 17 It is fairly reasonable for a group of students to publish 5 or 7 papers. If
one student publishes 5 papers at once, it is a little superising.
as |
|
S*********r
发帖数: 4729 | 18 That guy is from my university, our alumni.
ability as
， |
|
|
T**********n
发帖数: 480 | 20 这个说起来就搞笑了。。。
参加过MCM的人都知道那是什么货色吧，赫赫 |
|
T**********n
发帖数: 480 | 21 感觉好像就是高考考了一个上吊分，也不知道到底会不会被录取，哈哈
我觉得124很好了，应该能中，赫赫 |
|
|
|
r**t
发帖数: 937 | 24 5 means worst right?
that guy is so BT! |
|
O******Y
发帖数: 88 | 25 There are lots of BT reviews for vision conferences...
For the same paper, the review comments are often opposite. |
|
v******d
发帖数: 1322 | 26 this seems often happen in all areas... |
|
|
v******d
发帖数: 1322 | 28 only the paper pushed by someone would be brought for discussion.
if no one push your paper, a weak negative review can surely kill
the paper. |
|
p*****s
发帖数: 8 | 29 那象2,3,3这种分数呢?
倒是没有一个人说probably reject , 一个给3的说clearance方面英文太差,让他读的费
劲, 其他方面都给的1, 2.
另一个给3的也没有狠批,就觉得文章创新性还不是非常的强,其他也还好.
所以的reviewer都觉得实验很好, 全是1, 2.
哪位给分析分析? |
|
|
O******Y
发帖数: 88 | 31 Very possibly a poster. congrats!
费 |
|
p*****s
发帖数: 8 | 32 可是,reviewer 3说我的创新不行,说incremental, 这不是很negative么?
按照前面兄弟们的贴子, 这应该算negative point了吧.
的
review
to
gives
confident. |
|
T**********n
发帖数: 480 | 33 poster不会那么严吧
不过话又说回来，poster也就算是让老板掏注册费的一个理由，赫赫 |
|
O******Y
发帖数: 88 | 34 There is very little difference between a poster and an oral in your resume. |
|
O******Y
发帖数: 88 | 35 He gave a "3". Then it was not very negative. You should be fine, unless your
paper is in a very competitive topic.
读
sense |
|
p*****s
发帖数: 8 | 36 我也不知道我们是不是very competitive topic, 你说的是recognition这种领域? 那倒
不是.
今天我们实验室的博士后说, 233还不如224, 说只有50%的可能性, :(
发现现在大家意见很不统一的说.
rebuttal基本写完了,就等老板润色寄走了.
reviewer 2 也很郁闷, 他其他的分都给的不错, 全是1,2,就是clearance给了个3,说英语
读得费劲, 一堆语病,然后居然根据这个给了个overall的3, 这是怎么回事呢?
your
他 |
|
e******y
发帖数: 15 | 37 有的reviewer很不nice,
有的area里面的人都不nice,互相杀paper,特别狠,这样的area基本都是那种funding特
难找的,生怕别人搞出牛东西影响自己. |
|
r*****y
发帖数: 507 | 38 according to majority voting, I feel 233 is worse than 224, 125, or even 225. |
|
O******Y
发帖数: 88 | 39 The submission number is big. But most of them got pretty low scores though.
As we know, people would not like to show the scores if they are very low.
your |
|
|
e******y
发帖数: 15 | 41 具体不说啦, 一次别人聊天时候说的,还举了例子
说为啥某个牛会上这两年某个topic文章很少. |
|
O******Y
发帖数: 88 | 42 A "5" will kill a paper most likely, as a chair told me before. I feel without
negative score like "4" or "5" is better than with them. I myself had a 114
paper that was rejected several years ago.
225.
那倒
英语 |
|
|
O******Y
发帖数: 88 | 44 that is very true. detection/recognition seems a good area though.
有的area里面的人都不nice,互相杀paper,特别狠,这样的area基本都是那种funding特 |
|
e******y
发帖数: 15 | 45 Graphics方面的,说了你也不感兴趣, 不说拉,
反正个人觉得acdemic够厚黑,够世俗. |
|
O******Y
发帖数: 88 | 46 Hehe...
"acdemic够厚黑,够世俗" It is so true. When people publish papers for living,
they have to play 厚黑 and 世俗. |
|
T**********n
发帖数: 480 | 47 graphics主要阵地在siggraph吧，赫赫，也来这趟浑水啊，已经够乱了
再说其实哪里不世俗，哪里不厚黑呢，赫赫 |
|
r*****y
发帖数: 507 | 48 graphics?
I also heard some intersting comments:
some graphics conferences or topics are hijacked. :( |
|
e******y
发帖数: 15 | 49 为了提供更多给人糊口的position,
现在专门有个sub-area, vision for graphics,
就像俩难兄难弟一样. |
|
O******Y
发帖数: 88 | 50 Since IBR, there are more and more vision guys involved into graphics. Now
video editing etc. seems a notable area in siggraph. |
|
