由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
_BibleStudy版 - photo of 350AD bible with NIV verse of 1 John 5:7
相关主题
Version comparison of 1 john 5:7怎样读圣经?
A Closer Look at Vaticanus and Sinaiticus关于英文圣经版本
《圣经》原本与《马索拉抄本》 (转载)关于中文圣经
Bible proves to give rest if reader does我的看法 关于圣经版本
圣诞节和复活节是源于古代伪宗教给愿意鉴别圣经真伪的弟兄姊妹推荐两个好网站
问题是归回到哪个圣经?有这么多圣经呢Knuth的3.16引文(1)
仍然关于圣经版本Any good Chinese study bible?
英文圣经译本介绍even so, come, Lord Jesus
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: codex话题: john话题: niv话题: sinaiticus话题: photo
1 (共1页)
k*d
发帖数: 615
1
Excerpt from Codex Sinaiticus including 1 John 5:7–9. It lacks the Comma
Johanneum. The purple-coloured text says: "There are three witness bearers,
the Spirit and the water and the blood". This conforms to the NIV
version which many of us use today.
Codex Sinaiticus (London, Brit. Libr., Add. 43725; Gregory-Aland nº &#
1488; (Aleph) or 01) is a 4th century uncial manuscript of the Greek Bible,
written between 330–350.
q*******s
发帖数: 193
2
thanks for the photo.
l*****e
发帖数: 112
3
There are sufficient reasons to believe that
Codex Sinaiticus is a corrupted codex.
Specifically, it is believed to have been
corrupted by those who held Arian beliefs,
that is, they believe Jesus Christ is not
the same as God, but a lesser, created god.
For a classic reference, please see the
book by Rev. Frederick Nolan:
AN INQUIRY INTO THE INTEGRITY
OF THE GREEK VULGATE
OR RECEIVED TEXT OF THE
NEW TESTAMENT
available at:
http://www.mountainretreatorg.net/classics/inquiry0.html
From the Cathol

【在 k*d 的大作中提到】
: Excerpt from Codex Sinaiticus including 1 John 5:7–9. It lacks the Comma
: Johanneum. The purple-coloured text says: "There are three witness bearers,
: the Spirit and the water and the blood". This conforms to the NIV
: version which many of us use today.
: Codex Sinaiticus (London, Brit. Libr., Add. 43725; Gregory-Aland nº &#
: 1488; (Aleph) or 01) is a 4th century uncial manuscript of the Greek Bible,
: written between 330–350.

k*d
发帖数: 615
4
I believe that the evidence for the extra phrase (the `Comma') is much weaker and
more indirect. The evidence against the extra phrase is much stronger and
direct (see the one photo that I posted).
In order to convert my belief, I would need someone to supply at least two
direct counter-evidences: post similar photos from 2+ manuscripts that are well
accepted to be dated earlier than Codex Sinaitius and contain the extra
phrase,
and please show that these are not ``corrupted codex'' [I do not be

【在 l*****e 的大作中提到】
: There are sufficient reasons to believe that
: Codex Sinaiticus is a corrupted codex.
: Specifically, it is believed to have been
: corrupted by those who held Arian beliefs,
: that is, they believe Jesus Christ is not
: the same as God, but a lesser, created god.
: For a classic reference, please see the
: book by Rev. Frederick Nolan:
: AN INQUIRY INTO THE INTEGRITY
: OF THE GREEK VULGATE

1 (共1页)
相关主题
even so, come, Lord Jesus圣诞节和复活节是源于古代伪宗教
你们好问题是归回到哪个圣经?有这么多圣经呢
第八章 追求卓越――从野心看梦想 刘志雄仍然关于圣经版本
On the translation of Phil 2:6英文圣经译本介绍
Version comparison of 1 john 5:7怎样读圣经?
A Closer Look at Vaticanus and Sinaiticus关于英文圣经版本
《圣经》原本与《马索拉抄本》 (转载)关于中文圣经
Bible proves to give rest if reader does我的看法 关于圣经版本
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: codex话题: john话题: niv话题: sinaiticus话题: photo