r*****g
发帖数: 9999 | 1 【 以下文字转载自 Automobile 讨论区 】
发信人: realbug (WA), 信区: Automobile
标 题: Re: Bought it today. 06 Passat 21600 OTD
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Fri Dec 22 13:13:46 2006)
actually having good low end torque is one of the biggest advantage of turbo
engine. If you look at the dyno chart of many 2.0 to 2.5L turbo engine, its
torque is quite comparable to those 3.0 to 3.6L v6 NA engine. All turbo
does is to squeeze more air into the cylinder to produce similar force per
stroke to what v6 engine does. So there is no need | v****e
发帖数: 10715 | 2 开了几天的2.3L的Turbo5，的确感觉这个turbo和NA明显不同，动力输出的曲线很平，
turbo 这个发动机最大推力是在2100rpm，加速时发动机2k-3k间很长一端时间都有很平
稳的加速感， NA的发动机在加速时随转速和档位的变化推力不会保存象turbo那么长。
另一个Murano是CVT，开起来感觉也很不一样。
turbo
its
a
while
【在 r*****g 的大作中提到】
: 【 以下文字转载自 Automobile 讨论区 】
: 发信人: realbug (WA), 信区: Automobile
: 标 题: Re: Bought it today. 06 Passat 21600 OTD
: 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Fri Dec 22 13:13:46 2006)
: actually having good low end torque is one of the biggest advantage of turbo
: engine. If you look at the dyno chart of many 2.0 to 2.5L turbo engine, its
: torque is quite comparable to those 3.0 to 3.6L v6 NA engine. All turbo
: does is to squeeze more air into the cylinder to produce similar force per
: stroke to what v6 engine does. So there is no need
|
|
