d**e
发帖数: 863 | 1 The Strange Case of Josef Oehmen
In the wake of the nuclear incidents in Japan, a great deal of information
and misinformation has been spread – some of it deliberately. It’s
understandable that people misunderstand, or mishear. Misrepresenting
yourself to claim you’re an expert is something else. We expect that from
industry and politicians – we don’t expect it from a PhD employed by a
school as well-respected as MIT. But that’s just what’s happened, and is
still happening now.
On Sunday, March 13th, I saw an interesting link on Facebook. Since the
previous Friday, I’d been posting update information on the Japan disasters
, and had been one of the first people to post that there might – and I
stressed might – be nuclear problems. So when I saw a link saying “MIT
scientist says no problems”, it’s only natural to read it.
The post originally came from http://morgsatlarge.wordpress.com. Let’s first note that the name “Jason Morgan” does not appear on the morgsatlarge site. The site has one post (now redirecting to another site, which we’ll get to). Apparently, it was created yesterday. The “about” info is “About morgsatlarge English teacher, F1/ UFC enthusiast. Japan resident, quake survivor, and most importantly a husband to an amazing woman, and father to a beautiful baby girl.”
Jason is on Twitter, though, and thinks his “scientist friend” stuck his
neck out for him, and is telling the truth. He’s had a Twitter account
longer than last week, and he says Oehmen’s married to his cousin and is an
“awesome guy”. Sounds pretty benign, what with his claims the article
will be published on mit.edu, and has been vetted by nuke folks at MIT.
Jason had JUST been at the Japanese immigration office when the quake hit.
And he sure enough was genuinely worried about the nukes, based on his
tweets, in one of which he says he’s “shitting himself”. Nothing real
suspicious here.
In the Google cache for the site today, we see this (no longer on the site):
“I do not work for the nuclear industry. I am an English teacher, from
Australia, living in Kawasaki, Japan. My friend Dr J. Oehmen is a family
member, and by far and away the most intelligent person I know. Feel free to
believe/disbelieve whatever we have written. There are no conspiracies,
however if you need to, feel free to make some up….
This post is by Dr Josef Oehmen, a research scientist at MIT, in Boston.
He is a PhD Scientist, whose father has extensive experience in Germany’s
nuclear industry. I asked him to write this information to my family in
Australia, who were being made sick with worry by the media reports coming
from Japan. I am republishing it with his permission.”
The site I got linked to, though, was a repost from something called The
Energy Collective. http://theenergycollective.com/barrybrook/53461/fukushima-nuclear-accident-simple-and-accurate-explanation . This ONE instance of the article has been shared over 5000 times on facebook, and over 32k times in total.
The Energy Collective is a Siemens AG lobbying/influence/astroturf
organization – it says Powered by Siemens right up front. They present as a
“Nukes for the Environment” type. The author of the piece here is Barry
Brook, who lists himself as a “Professor of Climate Change” on the site.
He is – at the University of Adelaide – and is a strong proponent of
nuclear power. In other words, he has credentials on climate change, and is
pro-nuke. Then let’s note that this is a repost of something Brooks posted
on BraveNewClimate. We’ll get back to the crosspostings later.
In his introduction he says “Below I reproduce a summary on the situation
prepared by Dr Josef Oehmen, a research scientist at MIT, in Boston. He is a
PhD Scientist (sic), whose father has extensive experience in Germany’s
nuclear industry. This was first posted by Jason Morgan earlier this evening
, and he has kindly allowed me to reproduce it here. I think it is very
important that this information be widely understood.”
So let’s look at that “awesome guy”, Josef Oehmen.
Does he have a PhD? – indeed he does. In supply chain risk management. And
yes, he’s a “Research Scientist” – that’s his part of his actual job
title, not what he does. (LAI Research Scientist appears to be his title.)
He’s not in a traditional department – he works for something called the
Lean Advancement Initiative (LAI), which is a military-industrial-academic
project. As of today, his information page http://lean.mit.edu/about/lai-structure/faculty-researchers-and-staff/oehmen-josef clarifies that he is not involved with nukes at all.
It adds “Josef is working hard with a team from MIT to provide an
appropriate response to the interest the post has generated. The original
blog will be migrated to an MIT site, managed by a team of experts from MIT
’s Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering. The link will be posted
here when it becomes available.”
In the Twitter page set up yesterday, he says ”Josef is a research
scientist in mechanical engineering and engineering systems at the
Massachusetts Institute of Technology“. His about page says “He is a
mechanical engineer by training, working on product development processes.”
Interesting, not quite the same thing. He also says “MIT setting up
information hub on nuclear situation in Japan incl my original post: http://mitnse.com/” on his Twitter page.
Ok, that’s really interesting. Because mitnse.com was registered yesterday,
through wordpress.com. That was a Sunday, right? And while the contact
information says it’s for MIT, the admin contact is given for an
independent contracter, with the contractor’s phone number. The contractor
is a graphic designer who has done prior work for the department. (here’s
his site: http://www.subbiahdesign.com/web/index.html
There are only a couple of links from the department site – added well
after normal working hours on Monday night.
Before “mitnse” killed the comment and rss functions on this wordpress.com
site, you could see that rss feed said the site was “maintained by
students” in the NSE department. No such students have identified
themselves. And while the originally, highly erroneous post has been
redacted, the editors have not seen fit to identify themselves.
So – “students” on the site, “experts” in the announcement of it.
The comments were filled with statements about “intellectual dishonesty”
and “academic fraud”, as well as point by point rebuttal of many
statements Dr Oehmen had originally made. They were killed 5 minutes after I
posted the following:
“So far, although I see a link to this site from NSE, I don’t see any
discussion of it. And frankly, Mr/MS mitnse, as far as I can tell you’re
actually Ismail Subbiah, graphic designer occasionally on contract to MIT.
The links between Siemens AG, Dr Oethman, Barry Brook, and MIT/LAI (which
has cleverly been avoided – lets do bring that up, shall we?) suggest that
no matter why the article was written in the first place, it’s become a
major piece of disinformation masquerading falsely as academic opinion.”
As you can see, Siemens AG comes up again. Not surprising, because it
recently became an “industry partner” of MIT/LAI. But there is almost
certainly another connection. Dr Oehmen is German. If his father spent much
time in the German nuclear industry, there is a very very good chance that
he worked – or works – for Siemens.
LAI’s website says “LAI accelerates lean deployment through identified
best practices, shared communication, common goals, and strategic and
implementation tools honed from collaborative experience. LAI also promotes
cooperation at all levels and facets of an enterprise to eliminate
traditional barriers to improving industry and government teamwork.” http://lean.mit.edu/about/about-lai .
What that doesn’t say is who the industry partners are. Oddly, they are all
major defense contractors. And the only one I’ve found so far with any
direct connection to nuclear power plants is Siemens.
I’ll be looking deeper at this story, including the mechanisms used to
spread the original, and entirely specious, article across the web. It’s
still spreading now, mostly from people who would be horrified at this. | c*****g
发帖数: 1083 | | x*****2
发帖数: 1663 | |
|
