h*********n
发帖数: 11319 | 1 实际上，美国的警察根本就没有一定要保护市民的义务。
这个判例已经在Warren VS. DC的案子里解释得很清楚了。
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_v._District_of_Columbia
Warren v. District of Columbia[1] (444 A.2d. 1, D.C. Ct. of Ap. 1981) is an
oft-quoted[2] District of Columbia Court of Appeals (equivalent to a state
supreme court) case that held police do not have a duty to provide police
services to individuals, even if a dispatcher promises help to be on the way |
g******t
发帖数: 11249 | 2 看了，case是说没必要为failure负责吧
保护的义务还是有的
an
way
【在 h*********n 的大作中提到】
: 实际上，美国的警察根本就没有一定要保护市民的义务。
: 这个判例已经在Warren VS. DC的案子里解释得很清楚了。
: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_v._District_of_Columbia
: Warren v. District of Columbia[1] (444 A.2d. 1, D.C. Ct. of Ap. 1981) is an
: oft-quoted[2] District of Columbia Court of Appeals (equivalent to a state
: supreme court) case that held police do not have a duty to provide police
: services to individuals, even if a dispatcher promises help to be on the way
|
h*********n
发帖数: 11319 | 3 The court stated that official police personnel and the government
employing them owe no duty to victims of criminal acts and thus are not
liable for a failure to provide adequate police protection
“failure to provide police protection”, 不是保护不周，而是压根不出警。
【在 g******t 的大作中提到】
: 看了，case是说没必要为failure负责吧
: 保护的义务还是有的
:
: an
: way
|
g******t
发帖数: 11249 | 4 failure就是说police work失败了（不出警也算），他们不负责
【在 h*********n 的大作中提到】
: The court stated that official police personnel and the government
: employing them owe no duty to victims of criminal acts and thus are not
: liable for a failure to provide adequate police protection
: “failure to provide police protection”, 不是保护不周，而是压根不出警。
|
h*********n
发帖数: 11319 | 5 所以警察拒接911，拒绝出警，完全不违法。最多内部处分一下。
【在 g******t 的大作中提到】
: failure就是说police work失败了（不出警也算），他们不负责
|
