S*******i
发帖数: 2018 | 1 Win or lose, America’s 45th president deserves credit for a more
competitive economy, a nation at peace and a secure rule of law. Donald
Trump doesn’t trample Americans’ rights. He doesn’t start wars; he ends
them. And he makes comments that offend people. The cost of supporting Mr.
Trump is enduring awkward moments when he says things that presidents
shouldn’t say. The benefit is that he champions U.S. liberty and prosperity
, and a thriving America is a benefit to the world.
It may seem obvious that a president should prioritize the interests of his
country. But when Mr. Trump arrived in Washington, too many politicians
seemed to view America as one of the world’s problems. Barack Obama began
his presidency with a series of overseas speeches in which he described
American flaws. In 2016 he visited communist Cuba where he noted that the U.
S. had once sought to “exert control” over the country. Many suffering
Cubans wish that we’d succeeded.
Mr. Trump doesn’t apologize for America. When it comes to foreign relations
, he thinks that in many ways the U.S. has been too nice. But he also
brought the nicest news to the Middle East in decades, a series of historic
peace agreements between Israel and its Arab neighbors. In contrast with the
expansive ambitions of the Bush era and the apologetic retreats of Obama
days, Mr. Trump leads an America that is ready but not eager for war and
that encourages former foes to engage in peaceful commerce.
The pursuit of commercial vitality at home has defined his presidency, as it
defined his unconventional candidacy. “Is Donald Trump Serious?” asked a
New York Times headline in September 2015. A columnist mocked him for
seeking to sharply reduce the tax on corporate profits. The real mockery was
the damage the levy inflicted. When combined with state and local taxes,
the tax rate on corporate income amounted to nearly 40%, the highest in the
industrialized world. U.S. companies were fleeing for business-friendly
countries.
In 2017 Mr. Trump signed the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which reduced the top
federal corporate tax to 21% from 35%. The law triggered an increase in
business investment and a surge of optimism among employers, which turned
out well for employees. The Trump economy was characterized by historically
low unemployment rates, massive job openings, and rising wages for low- and
middle-income workers. The Covid pandemic and shutdowns wrought historic
economic destruction, but it’s now being followed by a historic rebound.
From the start of his presidency, Mr. Trump paired tax reform with
aggressive slashing of federal red tape. By the end of 2019 the
administration was setting another annual record for the smallest number of
final rules published in the Federal Register since such records began being
tallied in the 1970s. Wayne Crews of the Competitive Enterprise Institute
reports that by this measure the three best years for federal restraint all
belong to Mr. Trump.
The president tells us that a recent rule to speed approval of
infrastructure projects will turn out to be among his most significant
reforms, eliminating years of bureaucratic delays. His commitment to drain
the regulatory swamp was inspired by his own experience trying to figure out
ways to get necessary state and federal approvals for New York building
projects. “I understand the system. It’s a consultant system. The
consultants go up to Albany or they go down to Washington and they make it
very tough. So you have to hire consultants and pay them millions of dollars
to get a simple approval. No, I know that business,” he says.
By reducing the tax and regulatory burden, Mr. Trump has reduced the federal
footprint on Americans’ daily lives. Joe Biden promises to make that
footprint much larger.
Mr. Trump’s greatest legacy will likely be his success in appointing more
than 200 federal judges, including three Supreme Court justices, committed
to interpreting the law as written. In our interview he gave all the credit
to Harry Reid, who was majority leader in 2013 when the Senate eliminated
the filibuster for nominations.
That was called the “nuclear option,” because its destruction could be
foreseen to affect both parties. Now some Democrats regret their decision to
detonate—including, according to Mr. Trump, Chuck Schumer, Mr. Reid’s
successor as Democratic leader. The president reports that Mr. Schumer
frequently laments: “The worst thing that ever happened to us was Harry
Reid.” Mr. Trump sees it differently: “Thank God we had the nuclear option
.”
If Americans vote Mr. Trump out next week, they may thank him for
maintaining the rule of law and constitutional governance long after he
leaves the Oval Office—and long after his odd comments have been forgotten.
If they opt for a second Trump term, they’ll likely get more pro-growth
economic policy but should also expect that his unconventional method of
presidential communication will continue. We asked if he ever lets anyone,
including First Lady Melania Trump, review his tweets before he sends them.
“A little bit,” Mr. Trump answered. “But basically, I do what I do. You
know, I’m president. Somebody said, ‘Oh, that’s not good.’ I said, ‘Oh,
really? Where are we?’ ‘Sir, we’re in the Oval Office.’ I said, ‘That
’s right.’ ” | m********g
发帖数: 10469 | 2 这次川普11/3日晚不赢的干脆利落会麻烦，这帮GOP建制派如果看到结果胶着肯定会喊
话让他退出不要打官司。所以毛腿只需打平就及格。 | S*******i
发帖数: 2018 | 3 读者评论：
Thank you for a wonderful column that tells the real story of the Trump
Presidency. He did what he promised the bureaucrats, the politicians,
regulators, media, hate him. We can only hope for four more years.
Agree - it's said you can judge a person by his enemies. Well, who are Trump
's enemies?
- the media
- Progressives
- bureaucrats
Tells me all I need to know...
Why is it that most criticisms of Donald Trump are ad hominem? He’s a
racist, a white supremacist, a liar, unpresidential. Why don’t they attack
his policies instead? He’s lowered taxes too much, eliminated too many
regulations, made too many peace deals, hasn’t started enough wars, killed
too many members of ISIS, created too many jobs for minorities.
If Trump did anything it was to show the people that you can have government
without the swamp. The swamp tried everything to get rid of him but in
the end he prevailed. Unfortunately, if Biden wins next week, so does the
swamp. Maybe the American people are okay with the swamp but my guess is
that at heart most are not.
Thank you Maria - for this respectful view of a man who has shown up and
worked tirelessly for four years against a powerful destructive force to
undermine his efforts - many of which - as you point out, have been positive
for the country. When I watched Nancy Pelosi rip up the State of the Union
address on national television - it was the most disrespectful and
dishonoring act towards the American People and our government I have
witnessed in my lifetime. I hope the American people will vote for better
character than that - even if it comes in a challenging "personality"
package.
"Trump's already won."
Of course he has; he almost always wins (and we supporters are not sick of
winning yet). He won against 17 well-qualified Republicans in 2016; he won
against not only Hillary but Hillary backed by the corrupt Obama
administration, the deep state, and the MSM; he won against the Mueller
investigation, the ludicrous Ukraine hearings, and Pelosi's impeachment
fiasco; he won in establishing a conservative Supreme Court and other lower
courts; he won against ISIS, Iran, and N Korea and he neutralized China and
Russia; and, he's winning against the Covid pandemic and the restoration of
our economy. And, in this contest, he's competing against a nominee who is
better known for his corruption, senility, and socialist inclinations as
opposed to any accomplishments. I'll be surprised if the President doesn't
win in a landslide! | S*******i
发帖数: 2018 | 4 我觉得最麻烦的scenario是trump小赢。
【在 m********g 的大作中提到】
: 这次川普11/3日晚不赢的干脆利落会麻烦，这帮GOP建制派如果看到结果胶着肯定会喊
: 话让他退出不要打官司。所以毛腿只需打平就及格。
| b*******3
发帖数: 7 | 5 WSJ自从1928年以来还从没endorse过任何president,这评价已经很高，比对Biden的评
价高得多。 | S*******i
发帖数: 2018 | 6 这是Oped，不代表WSJ自己的意见。
【在 b*******3 的大作中提到】
: WSJ自从1928年以来还从没endorse过任何president,这评价已经很高，比对Biden的评
: 价高得多。
| m********g
发帖数: 10469 | 7 今天听本地电台共和党参议员说他支持川普，希望他能赢，不过他要输的话，当晚就输
。这帮共和党建制派是不会挺他，和民主党佩洛熙那么强硬挺拜登，根本无法比。
小赢如果赢的干脆也没关系。
【在 S*******i 的大作中提到】
: 我觉得最麻烦的scenario是trump小赢。
| r*********t
发帖数: 4911 | 8 不怕。只要川普赢，那么在美国国民本身就一定是landslide.因为要考虑到
左左作弊的成分在。
这时候左左闹，正好永久解决目前这帮主党以及彻底把主媒打趴下。
【在 S*******i 的大作中提到】
: 我觉得最麻烦的scenario是trump小赢。
| S*******i
发帖数: 2018 | 9 如果每个州的输赢都很clearcut， 应该没关系。
我担心的情况是如果PA这样的州盘面很close， 猪党肯定不会concede。
【在 m********g 的大作中提到】
: 今天听本地电台共和党参议员说他支持川普，希望他能赢，不过他要输的话，当晚就输
: 。这帮共和党建制派是不会挺他，和民主党佩洛熙那么强硬挺拜登，根本无法比。
: 小赢如果赢的干脆也没关系。
| b*******3
发帖数: 7 | 10 我觉得Trump不用PA也赢了，和小布什04年类似情况。
【在 S*******i 的大作中提到】
: 如果每个州的输赢都很clearcut， 应该没关系。
: 我担心的情况是如果PA这样的州盘面很close， 猪党肯定不会concede。
| | | p********2
发帖数: 1 | 11 那就打官司啊。虽然我觉得不会到这个局面，但是出现了就打官司，高法状态正好。
但是猪党肯定想ACB回避，要纠缠一番。
【在 S*******i 的大作中提到】
: 如果每个州的输赢都很clearcut， 应该没关系。
: 我担心的情况是如果PA这样的州盘面很close， 猪党肯定不会concede。
| x****d
发帖数: 2239 | 12 还有一种可能，拜登的腐败证据不会就这样了，小赢小输都会延长这个过程。 | d*********e
发帖数: 1441 | 13 这个估计不会，和党上下目前还是打算以后扛老川牌子出来选的，看莱茵泰德的态度就
明确了，这货估计24年要出来和pence抢nomination了，老川必背书pence，要看
pence自己的态度，所以和党要使绊，莱茵泰德早出来切割了，或者有意无意撇清老川
了，这货估计还是想要扛老川的牌子。。。
【在 m********g 的大作中提到】
: 这次川普11/3日晚不赢的干脆利落会麻烦，这帮GOP建制派如果看到结果胶着肯定会喊
: 话让他退出不要打官司。所以毛腿只需打平就及格。
| J*8
发帖数: 616 | 14 不怕麻烦。WinWinWin
【在 S*******i 的大作中提到】
: 我觉得最麻烦的scenario是trump小赢。
| j*********8
发帖数: 61 | 15 这是有多么蠢 才会认为pence这种烂神棍有机会选总统
【在 d*********e 的大作中提到】
: 这个估计不会，和党上下目前还是打算以后扛老川牌子出来选的，看莱茵泰德的态度就
: 明确了，这货估计24年要出来和pence抢nomination了，老川必背书pence，要看
: pence自己的态度，所以和党要使绊，莱茵泰德早出来切割了，或者有意无意撇清老川
: 了，这货估计还是想要扛老川的牌子。。。
| d*********e
发帖数: 1441 | 16 lmao。。。你这种智商就不要出来现眼了。。。
罗娘娘这号都是和党候选人，像pence这种根红苗正的基督徒加上老川的背书在24年会
是和党最理想的人选。。。
【在 j*********8 的大作中提到】
: 这是有多么蠢 才会认为pence这种烂神棍有机会选总统
| S**H
发帖数: 1256 | 17 所以建制派倾巢而出推了给 Floyd 哭丧的法官就是为了回避判案的 | S*******i
发帖数: 2018 | 18 Win or lose, America’s 45th president deserves credit for a more
competitive economy, a nation at peace and a secure rule of law. Donald
Trump doesn’t trample Americans’ rights. He doesn’t start wars; he ends
them. And he makes comments that offend people. The cost of supporting Mr.
Trump is enduring awkward moments when he says things that presidents
shouldn’t say. The benefit is that he champions U.S. liberty and prosperity
, and a thriving America is a benefit to the world.
It may seem obvious that a president should prioritize the interests of his
country. But when Mr. Trump arrived in Washington, too many politicians
seemed to view America as one of the world’s problems. Barack Obama began
his presidency with a series of overseas speeches in which he described
American flaws. In 2016 he visited communist Cuba where he noted that the U.
S. had once sought to “exert control” over the country. Many suffering
Cubans wish that we’d succeeded.
Mr. Trump doesn’t apologize for America. When it comes to foreign relations
, he thinks that in many ways the U.S. has been too nice. But he also
brought the nicest news to the Middle East in decades, a series of historic
peace agreements between Israel and its Arab neighbors. In contrast with the
expansive ambitions of the Bush era and the apologetic retreats of Obama
days, Mr. Trump leads an America that is ready but not eager for war and
that encourages former foes to engage in peaceful commerce.
The pursuit of commercial vitality at home has defined his presidency, as it
defined his unconventional candidacy. “Is Donald Trump Serious?” asked a
New York Times headline in September 2015. A columnist mocked him for
seeking to sharply reduce the tax on corporate profits. The real mockery was
the damage the levy inflicted. When combined with state and local taxes,
the tax rate on corporate income amounted to nearly 40%, the highest in the
industrialized world. U.S. companies were fleeing for business-friendly
countries.
In 2017 Mr. Trump signed the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which reduced the top
federal corporate tax to 21% from 35%. The law triggered an increase in
business investment and a surge of optimism among employers, which turned
out well for employees. The Trump economy was characterized by historically
low unemployment rates, massive job openings, and rising wages for low- and
middle-income workers. The Covid pandemic and shutdowns wrought historic
economic destruction, but it’s now being followed by a historic rebound.
From the start of his presidency, Mr. Trump paired tax reform with
aggressive slashing of federal red tape. By the end of 2019 the
administration was setting another annual record for the smallest number of
final rules published in the Federal Register since such records began being
tallied in the 1970s. Wayne Crews of the Competitive Enterprise Institute
reports that by this measure the three best years for federal restraint all
belong to Mr. Trump.
The president tells us that a recent rule to speed approval of
infrastructure projects will turn out to be among his most significant
reforms, eliminating years of bureaucratic delays. His commitment to drain
the regulatory swamp was inspired by his own experience trying to figure out
ways to get necessary state and federal approvals for New York building
projects. “I understand the system. It’s a consultant system. The
consultants go up to Albany or they go down to Washington and they make it
very tough. So you have to hire consultants and pay them millions of dollars
to get a simple approval. No, I know that business,” he says.
By reducing the tax and regulatory burden, Mr. Trump has reduced the federal
footprint on Americans’ daily lives. Joe Biden promises to make that
footprint much larger.
Mr. Trump’s greatest legacy will likely be his success in appointing more
than 200 federal judges, including three Supreme Court justices, committed
to interpreting the law as written. In our interview he gave all the credit
to Harry Reid, who was majority leader in 2013 when the Senate eliminated
the filibuster for nominations.
That was called the “nuclear option,” because its destruction could be
foreseen to affect both parties. Now some Democrats regret their decision to
detonate—including, according to Mr. Trump, Chuck Schumer, Mr. Reid’s
successor as Democratic leader. The president reports that Mr. Schumer
frequently laments: “The worst thing that ever happened to us was Harry
Reid.” Mr. Trump sees it differently: “Thank God we had the nuclear option
.”
If Americans vote Mr. Trump out next week, they may thank him for
maintaining the rule of law and constitutional governance long after he
leaves the Oval Office—and long after his odd comments have been forgotten.
If they opt for a second Trump term, they’ll likely get more pro-growth
economic policy but should also expect that his unconventional method of
presidential communication will continue. We asked if he ever lets anyone,
including First Lady Melania Trump, review his tweets before he sends them.
“A little bit,” Mr. Trump answered. “But basically, I do what I do. You
know, I’m president. Somebody said, ‘Oh, that’s not good.’ I said, ‘Oh,
really? Where are we?’ ‘Sir, we’re in the Oval Office.’ I said, ‘That
’s right.’ ” | m********g
发帖数: 10469 | 19 这次川普11/3日晚不赢的干脆利落会麻烦，这帮GOP建制派如果看到结果胶着肯定会喊
话让他退出不要打官司。所以毛腿只需打平就及格。 | S*******i
发帖数: 2018 | 20 读者评论：
Thank you for a wonderful column that tells the real story of the Trump
Presidency. He did what he promised the bureaucrats, the politicians,
regulators, media, hate him. We can only hope for four more years.
Agree - it's said you can judge a person by his enemies. Well, who are Trump
's enemies?
- the media
- Progressives
- bureaucrats
Tells me all I need to know...
Why is it that most criticisms of Donald Trump are ad hominem? He’s a
racist, a white supremacist, a liar, unpresidential. Why don’t they attack
his policies instead? He’s lowered taxes too much, eliminated too many
regulations, made too many peace deals, hasn’t started enough wars, killed
too many members of ISIS, created too many jobs for minorities.
If Trump did anything it was to show the people that you can have government
without the swamp. The swamp tried everything to get rid of him but in
the end he prevailed. Unfortunately, if Biden wins next week, so does the
swamp. Maybe the American people are okay with the swamp but my guess is
that at heart most are not.
Thank you Maria - for this respectful view of a man who has shown up and
worked tirelessly for four years against a powerful destructive force to
undermine his efforts - many of which - as you point out, have been positive
for the country. When I watched Nancy Pelosi rip up the State of the Union
address on national television - it was the most disrespectful and
dishonoring act towards the American People and our government I have
witnessed in my lifetime. I hope the American people will vote for better
character than that - even if it comes in a challenging "personality"
package.
"Trump's already won."
Of course he has; he almost always wins (and we supporters are not sick of
winning yet). He won against 17 well-qualified Republicans in 2016; he won
against not only Hillary but Hillary backed by the corrupt Obama
administration, the deep state, and the MSM; he won against the Mueller
investigation, the ludicrous Ukraine hearings, and Pelosi's impeachment
fiasco; he won in establishing a conservative Supreme Court and other lower
courts; he won against ISIS, Iran, and N Korea and he neutralized China and
Russia; and, he's winning against the Covid pandemic and the restoration of
our economy. And, in this contest, he's competing against a nominee who is
better known for his corruption, senility, and socialist inclinations as
opposed to any accomplishments. I'll be surprised if the President doesn't
win in a landslide! | | | S*******i
发帖数: 2018 | 21 我觉得最麻烦的scenario是trump小赢。
【在 m********g 的大作中提到】
: 这次川普11/3日晚不赢的干脆利落会麻烦，这帮GOP建制派如果看到结果胶着肯定会喊
: 话让他退出不要打官司。所以毛腿只需打平就及格。
| b*******3
发帖数: 7 | 22 WSJ自从1928年以来还从没endorse过任何president,这评价已经很高，比对Biden的评
价高得多。 | S*******i
发帖数: 2018 | 23 这是Oped，不代表WSJ自己的意见。
【在 b*******3 的大作中提到】
: WSJ自从1928年以来还从没endorse过任何president,这评价已经很高，比对Biden的评
: 价高得多。
| m********g
发帖数: 10469 | 24 今天听本地电台共和党参议员说他支持川普，希望他能赢，不过他要输的话，当晚就输
。这帮共和党建制派是不会挺他，和民主党佩洛熙那么强硬挺拜登，根本无法比。
小赢如果赢的干脆也没关系。
【在 S*******i 的大作中提到】
: 我觉得最麻烦的scenario是trump小赢。
| r*********t
发帖数: 4911 | 25 不怕。只要川普赢，那么在美国国民本身就一定是landslide.因为要考虑到
左左作弊的成分在。
这时候左左闹，正好永久解决目前这帮主党以及彻底把主媒打趴下。
【在 S*******i 的大作中提到】
: 我觉得最麻烦的scenario是trump小赢。
| S*******i
发帖数: 2018 | 26 如果每个州的输赢都很clearcut， 应该没关系。
我担心的情况是如果PA这样的州盘面很close， 猪党肯定不会concede。
【在 m********g 的大作中提到】
: 今天听本地电台共和党参议员说他支持川普，希望他能赢，不过他要输的话，当晚就输
: 。这帮共和党建制派是不会挺他，和民主党佩洛熙那么强硬挺拜登，根本无法比。
: 小赢如果赢的干脆也没关系。
| b*******3
发帖数: 7 | 27 我觉得Trump不用PA也赢了，和小布什04年类似情况。
【在 S*******i 的大作中提到】
: 如果每个州的输赢都很clearcut， 应该没关系。
: 我担心的情况是如果PA这样的州盘面很close， 猪党肯定不会concede。
| p********2
发帖数: 1 | 28 那就打官司啊。虽然我觉得不会到这个局面，但是出现了就打官司，高法状态正好。
但是猪党肯定想ACB回避，要纠缠一番。
【在 S*******i 的大作中提到】
: 如果每个州的输赢都很clearcut， 应该没关系。
: 我担心的情况是如果PA这样的州盘面很close， 猪党肯定不会concede。
| x****d
发帖数: 2239 | 29 还有一种可能，拜登的腐败证据不会就这样了，小赢小输都会延长这个过程。 | d*********e
发帖数: 1441 | 30 这个估计不会，和党上下目前还是打算以后扛老川牌子出来选的，看莱茵泰德的态度就
明确了，这货估计24年要出来和pence抢nomination了，老川必背书pence，要看
pence自己的态度，所以和党要使绊，莱茵泰德早出来切割了，或者有意无意撇清老川
了，这货估计还是想要扛老川的牌子。。。
【在 m********g 的大作中提到】
: 这次川普11/3日晚不赢的干脆利落会麻烦，这帮GOP建制派如果看到结果胶着肯定会喊
: 话让他退出不要打官司。所以毛腿只需打平就及格。
| | | J*8
发帖数: 616 | 31 不怕麻烦。WinWinWin
【在 S*******i 的大作中提到】
: 我觉得最麻烦的scenario是trump小赢。
| j*********8
发帖数: 61 | 32 这是有多么蠢 才会认为pence这种烂神棍有机会选总统
【在 d*********e 的大作中提到】
: 这个估计不会，和党上下目前还是打算以后扛老川牌子出来选的，看莱茵泰德的态度就
: 明确了，这货估计24年要出来和pence抢nomination了，老川必背书pence，要看
: pence自己的态度，所以和党要使绊，莱茵泰德早出来切割了，或者有意无意撇清老川
: 了，这货估计还是想要扛老川的牌子。。。
| d*********e
发帖数: 1441 | 33 lmao。。。你这种智商就不要出来现眼了。。。
罗娘娘这号都是和党候选人，像pence这种根红苗正的基督徒加上老川的背书在24年会
是和党最理想的人选。。。
【在 j*********8 的大作中提到】
: 这是有多么蠢 才会认为pence这种烂神棍有机会选总统
| S**H
发帖数: 1256 | 34 所以建制派倾巢而出推了给 Floyd 哭丧的法官就是为了回避判案的 | g********0
发帖数: 6201 | 35 https://news.sina.com.cn/w/2020-11-01/doc-iiznezxr9302048.shtml
备受全美国乃至全世界关注的美国2020年总统大选，还有3天就将到来，寻求连任
的美国总统特朗普一方正加紧在舆论场上散布各种鼓吹自己功绩的言论，而且一些吹捧
他的言论，还将这位争议不断的总统“吹捧出了新高度”。
美国《华尔街日报》评论版昨天就刊登了由美国保守派媒体福克斯新闻网的一名主
播以及该报评论版一名编辑联手撰写的这样一篇“歌功颂德”文，将特朗普描绘成了一
个会被美国人永远怀念的伟人不说，还宣称特朗普“已经赢了”。
“不论是赢是输，美国更具竞争力的经济、国家的和平以及一个更安全的法治体系
，都应归功于美国第45任总统。唐纳德·特朗普没有践踏美国人的权力。他没有掀起战
争，而是终结了战争”，这篇题为“特朗普已经赢了”的文章，开篇这样“肉麻”地写
道。
但更肉麻的还在后面。这篇文章称，尽管特朗普说出的一些话也会冒犯到别人，支
持他也意味着忍受这些尴尬的时候，看着他说出其他总统不会说出的话，“但好处是，
他在捍卫美国的自由和繁荣，而只有这样一个美国才能令全世界受益”。
接下来，这篇文章开始列举特朗普当政时的诸多“美德”。首先，在外交领域，此
文宣称诸如奥巴马那样的美国前总统，总是在不断地在全世界面前说美国不好，说美国
有这样那样的问题，甚至还对古巴人这样说，但特朗普就不会这样做，他反而认为美国
太惯着全世界了，所以特朗普一出手就给中东，给以色列及其阿拉伯邻国带来了“历史
性的和平协议”，做到了布什那套扩张主义和奥巴马那套四处道歉的腔调都没有做成的
事情。
其次，在国内经济领域，此文称经济是特朗普最出彩的领域，其给企业大幅减税和
简化审批流程的政策真正激活了美国经济，给美国带来了新繁荣，扩大了就业岗位，提
升了工资和大幅削减了失业率。此文甚至宣称，即便疫情和封锁给经济带来了历史性的
毁灭，但在特朗普的带领下美国经济正在反弹。
另外，此文还称颂了特朗普在任期间给美国输送了200名联邦法官，其中包括三名
最高法院大法官的“成绩”，称这是他给美国留下的“最伟大的遗产”。
由此，此文得出了一个与其文章开头“首尾呼应”的结论：“如果美国人在下周不
给特朗普投票，他们可能会在他离开白宫许多年后，因为他当年维护法治和依宪执政而
感谢他。。。。。。而如果他们选择给特朗普第二个任期，他们则很可能会迎来更多的
经济增长政策，尽管这意味着他那套并不循规蹈矩的说话方式，也会持续下去。”
当然，相信各位读到这里，都会觉得《华尔街日报》评论版这篇文章所描述出的那
个“特立独行的美国伟人”的形象，与我们所认识的那个因防疫失职导致900万美国人
感染和超22万美国人死亡，然后还在不断推卸责任，甚至污蔑医生与科学家的特朗普，
实在太过“违和”。
也不仅我们这样觉得，有至少一半以上的美国人恐怕都会认为这篇文章实在是太扯
了。在他们看来，若用四个字来形容特朗普执政的4年，那就是“糟糕透顶”。
但这恰恰就是极度分裂的美国社会最直观的一种展现：在支持特朗普、认同他那套
观念的人看来，他就是这样一个“伟人”；在反对他，鄙视他那套观念的人看来，他们
只希望11月3日是这场“噩梦”的终点。所以，还有3天就将到来的美国大选，其实也是
这样“两个世界”之间的一次决战。（但也有人悲观地认为，这“两个世界”的矛盾已
难以调和，不如直接“分家”得了……）
因此，类似《华尔街日报》评论版上的这种文章，在接下来的三天里我们应该还会
看到很多。而且有趣的是，就在《华尔街日报》评论版刊发那篇“特伟人”文章的同时
，特朗普阵营居然还“跨阵营”地在美国CNN这家本身厌恶特朗普的主流媒体的评论板
块，刊发了另一篇鼓吹他的文章。
其内容和《华尔街日报》这篇基本上相似，一边将特朗普美化成是一个“与众不同
”、“不循规蹈矩”的总统，一边在“发展”经济、维护中东“和平”以及维护美国的
“法治”和“价值观”上大唱他的赞歌。
无独有偶的是，特朗普的竞选对手拜登，昨天也“跨阵营”地在“亲特朗普”的福
克斯新闻网上刊登了一篇为自己拉票的文章。
但与特朗普阵营强调经济不同的是，拜登将最主要的火力集中在了特朗普的疫情应
对上，称美国正处在水深火热之中，而他一旦当选将立刻采取更有力的防疫政策，带领
美国人战胜疫情。
如此来看，此次美国大选，亦将是一场“要钱”还是“要命”的选择。 | c*n
发帖数: 36 | 36 这次老头赢了，2024和党肯定还得抗老爷子的旗子，老头要是这次输了，和党这帮孙子
会第一时间跳出来和他切割的，科鲁兹绝对会是领头羊，还有那个如婊。传统政客是没
有道德观念的，现在老头势大，龟孙子们都不得已收敛起来。
会喊
【在 d*********e 的大作中提到】
: 这个估计不会，和党上下目前还是打算以后扛老川牌子出来选的，看莱茵泰德的态度就
: 明确了，这货估计24年要出来和pence抢nomination了，老川必背书pence，要看
: pence自己的态度，所以和党要使绊，莱茵泰德早出来切割了，或者有意无意撇清老川
: 了，这货估计还是想要扛老川的牌子。。。
| c*n
发帖数: 36 | 37 哪个州的?就从科鲁兹最近的一些言论就可以看出，这货是在为大选失利做切割的准备。
【在 m********g 的大作中提到】
: 今天听本地电台共和党参议员说他支持川普，希望他能赢，不过他要输的话，当晚就输
: 。这帮共和党建制派是不会挺他，和民主党佩洛熙那么强硬挺拜登，根本无法比。
: 小赢如果赢的干脆也没关系。
|
|
