a****1
发帖数: 634 | 3 任何上到高院而且被接受的案子，大概都不是一句话说得清楚的，多半都有它的道理。
楼主的这种转贴，每次都省略了很多内容，以至于许多人昧于片面事实，而不分青红皂
白地一阵激动。了解楼主的习惯，最好看看两造说法再说。
首先，这项请求只是暂时的，只是疫情期间。其次，请求的理由是非法移民不敢出来接
受检测或治疗，这会恶化瘟疫的扩散。
New York, Connecticut, Vermont and New York City had asked the justices to
block the rule nationwide, arguing that while they are trying to stop the
spread of coronavirus, the government's rule is deterring some immigrants
from accessing health care and public benefits that are "essential tools for
protecting the public at large" by limiting the "spread and severity" of
the virus.
"Such narrow and temporary relief" is warranted, James argued.
In the petition, James provided examples of the impact of the rule on
immigrants. "A physician in Connecticut has spoken with patients who had
symptoms consistent with Covid-19," James wrote, "but were afraid to obtain
Covid-19 testing or seek treatment due to concerns about the Public Charge
Rule and fears that they could not afford to pay for treatment."
【在 r******g 的大作中提到】
: 赞！遵守宪法。
|
