b******n
发帖数: 3103 | 1 【 以下文字转载自 Military 讨论区 】
发信人: qianjin (前进), 信区: Military
标 题: Re: 被开除的代理司法部长这下傻了
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue Jan 31 21:55:48 2017, 美东)
傻逼们看看吧，这女傻鸟都够吊销律师执照的了：
Sally Yates deserved to get canned. Now, the bar association should consider
yanking her license to practice law.
In defying President Trump’s executive order on immigration, the Acting
Attorney General flouted the law and violated ethics that govern lawyers.
It is not the prerogative of the Attorney General to decide what laws are
constitutional. That is the job of the courts. As the chief law enforcement
officer, she does not get to pick and choose which laws to enforce and
which ones to ignore. She is duty-bound to defend and enforce all laws,
including presidential executive orders.
If an Attorney General disagrees with an executive order, her ethical
obligation under the code of Professional Responsibility is to communicate
that to the president. If it cannot be resolved to her satisfaction, she has
two choices: enforce the order or resign her position. This is plainly set
forth in sections 1.13 and 1.16 of the Rules of Professional Conduct for the
District of Columbia.
Yates did neither. Instead, she violated legal ethics by actively
undermining the President and issuing her own order countermanding the
President. She has no such authority. What would happen if other cabinet
secretaries or federal officials committed the same acts as Yates? The
result would be chaos and anarchy. The rule of law would vanish.
President Trump had ample justification for firing Yates. She committed an
egregious violation of ethical standards and a serious breach of her duties.
Yates Is Not Qualified To Make A Constitutional Determination
Yates is not a constitutional law expert. Her career has been in
prosecutions. But within the Department of Justice, there are experts on
constitutional law. Some of them are in the Office of Legal Counsel at the
DOJ. They reviewed the president’s executive order and gave it their
approval as to form and legality. Yates deliberately chose to ignore their
sound reasoning.
It is clear that Yates’ decision was political, not legal. How do we know?
Look at what she wrote in her memorandum ordering attorneys not to defend
the president’s executive order in legal challenges. She questioned whether
the policy was “wise or just”. That is a political judgment. She
fundamentally misunderstands her job and her duties.
The Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled that Congress and the executive
branch have “plenary power” to regulate immigration. For more than a
century the high court has upheld almost every federal immigration
regulation against constitutional challenges. Much, if not all, of the
Trump executive order is constitutional. Past presidents, including FDR,
Truman, Carter and Obama, have excluded people from various countries that
pose a threat. Those orders have survived legal challenges.
Why Would Yates Ignore Ethical Rules?
Either Yates does not understand the ethical canons… or she was
grandstanding for personal gain. The evidence shows it is the latter.
Consider the address she delivered in November of 2015 to the 10th Annual
Prosecution Summit in which she stated the ethical duty owed to clients:“It
is your ethical responsibility to represent their interests, regardless of
whether you think they’re really right or whether you even like them.”
Obviously, Yates understands the proper role of a lawyer… which means her
recent conduct was likely done for political and personal profit.
As a holdover from the Obama Administration, she was already out the door in
a few days. Her diplomas were probably off the walls and her boxes packed
up. By instigating her own firing, she gets her face on the front page of
every newspaper in America and overnight becomes a political darling of
democrats and the left. That may pay dividends for her career.
But is a shameless act of self-promotion unworthy of a conscientious lawyer. | y******3
发帖数: 602 | | G****e
发帖数: 11198 | 3 很好的文章，不知道多少作弊会认真读，学习，提高。 | b*****e
发帖数: 5907 | 4 哥早就说了yates完了，左逼还yy呢。ag是serve at the presidents pleasure。这种
人没人现在敢收她
consider
enforcement
【在 b******n 的大作中提到】
: 【 以下文字转载自 Military 讨论区 】
: 发信人: qianjin (前进), 信区: Military
: 标 题: Re: 被开除的代理司法部长这下傻了
: 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue Jan 31 21:55:48 2017, 美东)
: 傻逼们看看吧，这女傻鸟都够吊销律师执照的了：
: Sally Yates deserved to get canned. Now, the bar association should consider
: yanking her license to practice law.
: In defying President Trump’s executive order on immigration, the Acting
: Attorney General flouted the law and violated ethics that govern lawyers.
: It is not the prerogative of the Attorney General to decide what laws are
| m**k
发帖数: 1503 | 5 人家不怕，BLM之类的NGO抢着要
【在 b*****e 的大作中提到】
: 哥早就说了yates完了，左逼还yy呢。ag是serve at the presidents pleasure。这种
: 人没人现在敢收她
:
: consider
:
: enforcement
|
|
