g********2
发帖数: 6571 | 1 The Wrath of Khan
by Ann Coulter
|
Posted: Aug 03, 2016 2:49 PM
Khizr Khan, the Muslim "Gold Star Father" who harangued Americans at the
Democratic National Convention, with a mute, hijab-wearing wife at his side,
is just another in a long string of human shields liberals send out to
defend their heinous policies. The "Jersey Girls" were the classic example,
first described in that magnificent book Godless: The Church of Liberalism.
In order to shut down a debate they're losing, Democrats find victims to
make their arguments for them, pre-empting counter-argument by droning on
about the suffering of their victim-spokesperson. Alternative opinions must
be preceded by proof that the speaker has "sacrificed" more than someone who
lost a child, a husband, or whatever.
Khan's argument, delivered angrily and in a thick Pakistani accent at the
DNC, is that "our" Constitution requires us to continue the nonstop
importation of Muslims.
If the U.S. Constitution required us to admit more than 100,000 Muslims a
year -- as we do -- we'd already be living in Pakistan, and Khan wouldn't
have had to move to get that nice feeling of home. So the "argument" part of
Khan's point is gibberish.
Luckily, Khan had Part Two: His son died in Iraq, whereas Donald Trump does
not have a son who died in Iraq, so he can't say anything.
Yes, a candidate for president of the United States is supposed to be
prohibited from discussing a dangerous immigration program because Khan's
son was one of fourteen (14!) Muslim servicemen killed by other Muslims in
our wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. That's why we're obligated to import yet
more Muslims – including, undoubtedly, some just like the ones who killed
his son. Q.E.D.!
If you think that doesn't make any sense, keep your yap shut, unless you
lost a child in Iraq, too.
There were virtually no Muslims in America before Teddy Kennedy's 1965
immigration act. Today, we admit more immigrants from Muslim countries than
from Great Britain.
Are Americans allowed to have an opinion on whether that's a good idea?
So far, it's worked out great!
In addition to the sudden appearance of honor killings, clitorectomies,
hijabs and massive government frauds, Muslim immigrants have given us: The
most devastating terrorist attack in world history, followed by terrorist
attacks at Fort Hood, the Boston Marathon, a military recruiting center in
Chattanooga, Times Square, Vaughan Foods in Oklahoma, San Bernardino and an
Orlando nightclub, among other places.
We've admitted 2 million Muslims just since 9/11 – that’s more than had
been admitted before 9/11. If we don't make it 3 million, we're monsters?
May we ask how many Muslims Khan's mystery Constitution requires -- or is
that out of bounds unless we had a child who died in Iraq?
Apparently, sending out a victim to make their argument was the only option
left for the "Make America Muslim!" crowd.
After Trump somehow got the crazy idea that a presidential candidate was
allowed to discuss government policies and proposed a temporary ban on
Muslim immigration -- which, by the way, is perfectly constitutional -- the
entire media and political class erupted in a sputtering rage.
Conscience of a Nation, Speaker Paul Ryan proclaimed: "That's not who we are
." Jeb! Bush made the subtle and clever argument that Trump was "unhinged."
Marco Rubio called any pause in Muslim immigration "offensive." ABC News'
Jonathan Karl called Trump's plan "outrageous" -- which was way better than
MSNBC, where Trump was compared to white supremacists and Nazis.
White House spokesman Josh Earnest said Trump had "disqualifie(d)" himself
from "serving as president" for suggesting any slowdown in Muslim
immigration. Vice President Joe Biden -- tribune of blue-collar Americans
everywhere! -- said that if Trump were the nominee, Hillary would "win in a
walk."
Then it turned out Trump's Muslim ban was a huge hit with actual voters.
Hillary, who promises to quadruple the number of Syrian "refugees" we bring
in, is quite far from winning "in a walk."
So the media and political class had no choice: They had to produce a victim
to make their argument, in order to block any response. For their next
trick, Democrats plan to produce a little girl whose parents were recently
murdered to present their tax plan. (Better make sure they weren't killed by
an illegal alien!)
Does anyone know what Khan thinks of gays? How about miniskirts? Alcohol?
Because I gather we're going to have to turn all our policies over to him,
too. What have you sacrificed, Barney Frank??
Muslim troops accounted for 0.2 percent of all U.S. troop deaths in the Iraq
and Afghanistan wars. Southerners accounted for 38 percent of those killed
in Iraq and 47 percent in Afghanistan.
What has South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley "sacrificed" compared to the
families of these men? How about Nikki put their flag back up?
The Confederate flag won't lead to thousands of dead and maimed Americans,
as Muslim immigration does. The only danger posed by the Confederate flag is
that media elites will hold the South in even greater contempt than they
already do, assuming that's possible.
But as long as they brought it up, if only people who lost children in our
wars may discuss public policy, then only they should vote, not only on how
many more Muslim immigrants this country needs, but on all government
policies. What has Chuck Todd sacrificed? Have any current members of The
New York Times editorial board ever lost a son in war? (Fighting on the
American side.)
The inevitable conclusion to the hysteria over Khan is that only those who
have worn the uniform and heard shots fired in anger can vote in our
elections. Hello, media? Hey -- where'd everybody go?
http://townhall.com/columnists/anncoulter/2016/08/03/the-wrath-of-khan-n2201577 | T*********I
发帖数: 10729 | 2 living in Pakistan真是如此。
这个穆斯林老爸很明显显示出美国人民政治上的幼稚。不明白军属怎么就不能被质疑，
就大逆不道。
军属应该被礼貌对待。TRUMP说的很好，也很礼貌。但是该质疑应该可以质疑。
那我找出几百万个烈士家属选总统，你我不是烈士家属的不能投票怎么样？
投票即然可以和几百万个烈士家属投不同的票，为什么质疑一句就完全逆天了呢！ | i******0
发帖数: 609 | 3 说得很好。
希望川普顶着这个几乎是终级PC的话题的压力把"理越辩越明"的哲学贯彻下去，开启民
智。
【在 T*********I 的大作中提到】
: living in Pakistan真是如此。
: 这个穆斯林老爸很明显显示出美国人民政治上的幼稚。不明白军属怎么就不能被质疑，
: 就大逆不道。
: 军属应该被礼貌对待。TRUMP说的很好，也很礼貌。但是该质疑应该可以质疑。
: 那我找出几百万个烈士家属选总统，你我不是烈士家属的不能投票怎么样？
: 投票即然可以和几百万个烈士家属投不同的票，为什么质疑一句就完全逆天了呢！
| h*******u
发帖数: 15326 | 4 说得不错
但是怎么传播出去？
side,
,
【在 g********2 的大作中提到】
: The Wrath of Khan
: by Ann Coulter
: |
: Posted: Aug 03, 2016 2:49 PM
: Khizr Khan, the Muslim "Gold Star Father" who harangued Americans at the
: Democratic National Convention, with a mute, hijab-wearing wife at his side,
: is just another in a long string of human shields liberals send out to
: defend their heinous policies. The "Jersey Girls" were the classic example,
: first described in that magnificent book Godless: The Church of Liberalism.
: In order to shut down a debate they're losing, Democrats find victims to
| w******n
发帖数: 347 | 5 这文章说得真好，怎么能让更多华人看到？？？
在电视上看到关于这个话题的争论，不少老美都认为Gold star families are sacred,
they can say what ever they want.
先不说这本身对不对，问题是Trump也没拦着他们说话，只是针对“你不懂美国宪法”
这个攻击给与了反驳而已。这也不行了？
【在 i******0 的大作中提到】
: 说得很好。
: 希望川普顶着这个几乎是终级PC的话题的压力把"理越辩越明"的哲学贯彻下去，开启民
: 智。
| G**Y
发帖数: 33224 | 6 Khan for President!
side,
,
【在 g********2 的大作中提到】
: The Wrath of Khan
: by Ann Coulter
: |
: Posted: Aug 03, 2016 2:49 PM
: Khizr Khan, the Muslim "Gold Star Father" who harangued Americans at the
: Democratic National Convention, with a mute, hijab-wearing wife at his side,
: is just another in a long string of human shields liberals send out to
: defend their heinous policies. The "Jersey Girls" were the classic example,
: first described in that magnificent book Godless: The Church of Liberalism.
: In order to shut down a debate they're losing, Democrats find victims to
|
|
