g********2
发帖数: 6571 | 1 Prof. John Banzhaf: ‘Virtually All Constitutional Scholars Agree’ Muslim
Immigration Ban Would Be Legal
George Washington University Law School Professor John Banzhaf was a guest
on Tuesday’s Breitbart News Daily, where he discussed the constitutionality
of Donald Trump’s proposed ban on Muslim immigration with SiriusXM host
Stephen K. Bannon.
Bannon asked if Democratic National Convention speaker Khizr Khan was
correct to assert that Trump’s idea violated the Constitution, a point he
made by waving a pocket copy of the document and asking if Trump has ever
read it.
Banzhaf said it was the view of “virtually all constitutional professors
who have written on the topic” that Khan was wrong.
http://www.breitbart.com/radio/2016/08/02/prof-john-banzhaf-virtually-all-constitutional-scholars-agree-muslim-immigration-ban-would-be-legal/ |
g********2
发帖数: 6571 | 2 khan是研究sharia law的，可能以为美国宪法就跟sharia law一样吧。 |
T********N
发帖数: 1507 | 3 这下玩大了,
Hillary 连美国宪法都不熟, 找了个三脚猫出来, 教Trump宪法 |
T********N
发帖数: 1507 | |
R*********0
发帖数: 3242 | |
u***n
发帖数: 21026 | 6 支持在美国实行sharia law，等美国人民忙着每天撅5次屁股的时候就没有时间搞南海
的事情了
看看沙特阿拉伯在也门的战斗力就知道了，中国未来100年国运就考穆斯林了 |
c*******o
发帖数: 8869 | 7 排华法案也不违反宪法，但是这些东西都和宪法的精神相违背，比如
"...but no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any
office or public trust under the United States..."
就暗含了不同信仰人人平等的意思。
constitutionality
【在 g********2 的大作中提到】
: Prof. John Banzhaf: ‘Virtually All Constitutional Scholars Agree’ Muslim
: Immigration Ban Would Be Legal
: George Washington University Law School Professor John Banzhaf was a guest
: on Tuesday’s Breitbart News Daily, where he discussed the constitutionality
: of Donald Trump’s proposed ban on Muslim immigration with SiriusXM host
: Stephen K. Bannon.
: Bannon asked if Democratic National Convention speaker Khizr Khan was
: correct to assert that Trump’s idea violated the Constitution, a point he
: made by waving a pocket copy of the document and asking if Trump has ever
: read it.
|
t*******d
发帖数: 12895 | 8 “私人邮件服务器不但illegal, 而且 "disqualifies" her from holding ANY
federal office.”
结果蛀党提名她为总统候选人，真是lawless党？
http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t/USANews/32062729.html |
g********2
发帖数: 6571 | 9 这是说美国公民不能因为宗教信仰影响就任公职，关外国人（难民）什么事？
你这洗地的水平太差了！
【在 c*******o 的大作中提到】
: 排华法案也不违反宪法，但是这些东西都和宪法的精神相违背，比如
: "...but no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any
: office or public trust under the United States..."
: 就暗含了不同信仰人人平等的意思。
:
: constitutionality
|
m****o
发帖数: 4654 | 10 看来你英语不好，这段说的很清楚：违法移动或藏匿文件是要坐牢的，而且未来不能参
选任何政府职务
(b) Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book,
document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes,
mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined
under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall
forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the
United States.
【在 g********2 的大作中提到】
: 这是说美国公民不能因为宗教信仰影响就任公职，关外国人（难民）什么事？
: 你这洗地的水平太差了！
|
m********g
发帖数: 10469 | |
c*******o
发帖数: 8869 | 12 Chinese exclusion act is not in violation of constitution text but
constitution spirit.
【在 g********2 的大作中提到】
: 这是说美国公民不能因为宗教信仰影响就任公职，关外国人（难民）什么事？
: 你这洗地的水平太差了！
|
p******r
发帖数: 1127 | 13 go fuck your spirit
【在 c*******o 的大作中提到】
: Chinese exclusion act is not in violation of constitution text but
: constitution spirit.
|
