由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
USANews版 - 哪些工作会被机器代替?
相关主题
民主党的好主意其实挺多的...Paul Ryan test
右媒和美国共和党果然猛烈攻击主持人Candy偏袒了Robert Weissberg炮轰疤蟆文凭大跃进
Rahm's Chicago: 2,409 City Employees Make Over $100k per Year看看左棍人渣washington post是怎么办学诈骗的.
Carson的新疑似谎言Gingrich 女儿13岁做童工.
Clintons Confidant in a big trouble zzAll of these things are just like the other …
麻省小学图书馆拒绝Melania trump捐书其实这些脑残大学生找不到工作是活该
今天US open简直就是又一个2016大选!Court blocks California law banning gay therapy
The good old days (From my friend's email)加州说不行,你们不可以有治疗gay佬的therapy
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: jobs话题: job话题: computer话题: replaced话题: study
进入USANews版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
l****z
发帖数: 29846
1
Odds of losing a Job to Automation: Which Jobs are at Risk, Which Aren't?
A number of articles now circulating are all based on a 2013 study The
Future of Employment: How Susceptible are Jobs to Computerization?.
It's interesting that the 2013 report is now seeing the light of day in
various places just this week. The best of the lot is the NPR Planet Money
report Will Your Job Be Done By A Machine?
The article lets you select from two drop boxes, the first is job field, the
second is a specific job within that field.
Here are some random results
Cartographers and Photogrammetrists: 87.9%
Electrical Drafters: 80.8%
Umpires and Referees: 98.3%
Technical Writers: 88.8%
Translators: 38.4%
Tax Preparers: 98.7%
Accountants and Auditors: 93.5%
Credit Counselors: 4.0%
Editors: 5.5%
Maids and Housekeepers: 68.8%
Janitors: 66.3%
Computer Programmers: 48.1%
Actuaries: 20.6%
Computer Systems Analysts: 0.6%
Roofers: 89.7%
Rail Track Laying: 89.1%
Carpenters: 72.4%
Paralegals: 94.5%
Court Reporters: 50.2%
Timing Device Assemblers: 98.5%
Packaging: 98.0%
Bakers: 88.8%
Jewelers: 95.5%
Optometrists: 13.7%
Dentists: 0.4%
Occupational Therapists: 0.3%
Telemarketers: 99.0%
Fashion Models 97.6%
Cashiers: 97.1%
Insurance Agents: 91.9%
Librarians: 64%
College Professors: 3.2%
I disagree with some of those. For example, there is absolutely no need for
relics like librarians as libraries will become extinct.
Paralegal jobs are already vanishing rapidly as are packaging jobs.
Telemarketing has already been replaced by auto-dialers that say "Hi this is
Heather, your account specialist".
I fail to see why we need court reporters. And why can't actuaries be
replaced by a computer model?
On the positive side, I have better hopes for janitors than the study. And
while baseball umpires may vanish, football referees won't. I highly doubt
maid services and home cleaning will go away, but those will be low paying
jobs.
I could not find categories for truck and taxi drivers, two fields that will
shed millions of jobs over the next decade.
It's easy to quibble with individual assessments. Yet, the overall picture
is clearly quite grim for numerous occupations.
1 (共1页)
进入USANews版参与讨论
相关主题
加州说不行,你们不可以有治疗gay佬的therapyClintons Confidant in a big trouble zz
Christie说让NJ人民来决定吧麻省小学图书馆拒绝Melania trump捐书
Climate Idiot: Fracking Only Creates Jobs For Hookers And Hotel Maids今天US open简直就是又一个2016大选!
UC Merced Attacker: Faisal Mohammad, Liberal ?The good old days (From my friend's email)
民主党的好主意其实挺多的...Paul Ryan test
右媒和美国共和党果然猛烈攻击主持人Candy偏袒了Robert Weissberg炮轰疤蟆文凭大跃进
Rahm's Chicago: 2,409 City Employees Make Over $100k per Year看看左棍人渣washington post是怎么办学诈骗的.
Carson的新疑似谎言Gingrich 女儿13岁做童工.
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: jobs话题: job话题: computer话题: replaced话题: study