由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
USANews版 - Kentucky argues gay marriage ban not biased
相关主题
Supreme Court OKs unlimited corporate spending on electionsSupreme Court Justice Ruth Ginsburg 腹背受敌
Supreme irony?Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas Denies Groping Accusation
"It’s an amazing show of balls by The One"地区联邦法官那个判决到底有没有效?
哈哈,德州州长反应神速,利用宗教打响反中央第一枪! (转载)Gorsuch is confirmed by the senator as Supreme Court Justice
德克萨斯共和国,好样的!Trump likely considering next Supreme Court pick
10月5号高庭重审fisher对ut austin 一案门外汉眼中的蛋糕店事件
Trump releases list of potential SCOTUSSotomayor男女不同酬是个大问题
两次庇护obamacare的top Supreme Court lawyer 下台了原来DACA appeal没经过第九马戏团直接去了高院
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: kentucky话题: marriage话题: gay话题: supreme话题: court
进入USANews版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
l****z
发帖数: 29846
1
March 31, 2015 - 1:06 PM
Associated Press
FRANKFORT, Ky. (AP) — Gov. Steve Beshear's administration is arguing in a
brief filed with the U.S. Supreme Court that Kentucky's ban on gay marriage
isn't discriminatory because it bars both gay and straight people from same-
sex unions.
The brief argues that because Kentucky's law bars everyone from same-sex
marriage, it isn't discriminatory and should be upheld.
Attorney Dan Canon, who represents six gay couples challenging Kentucky's
gay marriage ban, told The Courier-Journal http://cjky.it/1EZ2tMy that the argument in the brief filed last week is "especially absurd."
"Kentucky is in essence saying that our clients are precluded from marriage
entirely, unless they change their sexual orientation (or simply marry
someone to whom they are not attracted)," he said in an email.
"It's akin to passing a law banning all Catholic churches within city limits
, and then saying it's not discriminatory because you can still go to a
Baptist church," he said
Beshear spokeswoman Kerri Richardson said the governor would have no comment
. He has said previously he favors a decision by the Supreme Court.
Mathew Staver, who is chairman of the conservative legal group Liberty
Counsel, said that same-sex couples and opposite-sex couples are not "
similarly situated" by biology or history and therefore do not have equal
protection under the law as defined by Supreme Court decisions.
Justices will hear arguments on April 28 on state marriage bans from Ohio,
Kentucky, Michigan and Tennessee.
1 (共1页)
进入USANews版参与讨论
相关主题
原来DACA appeal没经过第九马戏团直接去了高院德克萨斯共和国,好样的!
Mike Lee兄弟俩都在short list10月5号高庭重审fisher对ut austin 一案
金斯伯格快不行了Trump releases list of potential SCOTUS
金时报没几天活了。两次庇护obamacare的top Supreme Court lawyer 下台了
Supreme Court OKs unlimited corporate spending on electionsSupreme Court Justice Ruth Ginsburg 腹背受敌
Supreme irony?Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas Denies Groping Accusation
"It’s an amazing show of balls by The One"地区联邦法官那个判决到底有没有效?
哈哈,德州州长反应神速,利用宗教打响反中央第一枪! (转载)Gorsuch is confirmed by the senator as Supreme Court Justice
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: kentucky话题: marriage话题: gay话题: supreme话题: court