d*****s
发帖数: 5610 | 1 【 以下文字转载自 Military 讨论区 】
发信人: dodgers (Dodgers), 信区: Military
标 题: Harvard和UNC被起诉歧视亚裔学生
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Mon Nov 17 20:43:31 2014, 美东)
这种策略是美国黑人当年采用的策略，当年NAACP成立后，成立了专门的律师部门，有
很多白人律师帮助NAACP起诉。打过无数官司。
起诉的后果是被起诉方成本不断上升，最后到最高法院，一次不成，再换个理由起诉，
一直到最高法院屈服。
http://www.businessinsider.com/harvard-and-unc-chapel-hill-sued | d*****s
发帖数: 5610 | 2 http://studentsforfairadmissions.org/legal-issues/
Here is what the Court wrote:
“…strict scrutiny imposes on the university the ultimate burden of
demonstrating, before turning to racial classifications, that available,
workable race-neutral alternatives do not suffice.”
“It is at all times the University’s obligation to demonstrate, and the
Judiciary’s obligation to determine, that admissions processes ensure that
each applicant is evaluated as an individual and not in a way that makes an
applicant’s race or ethnicity the defining feature of his or her
application.”
It is our belief that Harvard, UNC and most competitive universities are not
in compliance with the Supreme Court’s instructions.
如果这个是对的话，这个组织采用的策略就是NAACP在Brown vs Board of Education之
后采用的策略一样，NAACP当年在最高法院判了后，在全美国几百个学区起诉，最后强
迫那些学区执行。
不知道这个组织有没有钱一个学校一个学校打官司？受影响的亚裔在哪里？ | b*****o
发帖数: 6080 | 3 是上次说到的那个王姓小孩起的头儿吗？这次媒体报道还挺本分，没有故意倒一边。是
因为左主流们还忙着别的事没注意到，还是故意不报才可以不自打自脸？
另外大家看见没，nytimes/cnn/nbc等完全没有对麻省理工经济学家丑闻提一个字。 | x****k
发帖数: 2932 | 4 这个suit实际上是edward blum以"Students for Fair Admissions Inc"作为plaintiff
发起的. 他是projectonfairrepresentation的头,也参与了最近不少high profile
civil lawsuit.
可以通过这个网址联系捐款的事
http://www.projectonfairrepresentation.org
其他相关链接
http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/tag/students-for-fair-admissions
http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2012/12/civil-rights-edward-blu
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/24/us/edward-blum-and-the-projec
http://studentsforfairadmissions.org/
that
an
【在 d*****s 的大作中提到】
: http://studentsforfairadmissions.org/legal-issues/
: Here is what the Court wrote:
: “…strict scrutiny imposes on the university the ultimate burden of
: demonstrating, before turning to racial classifications, that available,
: workable race-neutral alternatives do not suffice.”
: “It is at all times the University’s obligation to demonstrate, and the
: Judiciary’s obligation to determine, that admissions processes ensure that
: each applicant is evaluated as an individual and not in a way that makes an
: applicant’s race or ethnicity the defining feature of his or her
: application.”
|
|
