由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
USANews版 - New IRS Obamacare Rule Guarantees Massive Job Loss
相关主题
Obamacare Will Cost Young People Thousands More Per YearObamacare涨价看看怎么影响大选
We need healthcare reform恭喜川普当选美国总统,希望他能推动全民公费医疗
damn obamacarePRE-EXISTING不移除,Permium必然升高,无解
For past 4 years, who's tax is raised by Obama?Trump的Healthcare Plan雏形
奥巴马没能在OBAMACARE上整翻螺母泥川總說Rand Paul會支持 House GOP Healthcare Plan
大家的医疗保险涨价了么? Mine ^~80%Man who attended 45 rallies now opposes Trump
healthcare.gov总共登记了两万人Trump医保语录
v5:美帝医疗开支3万亿 (转载)麦肯挽救了共和党
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: obamacare话题: massive话题: new话题: irs话题: employers
进入USANews版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
l****z
发帖数: 29846
1
May 27, 2014 Posted by Warner Todd Huston
For the last two years many businesses have been warning that because
Obamacare will hurt them so badly they will cease offering employees
healthcare and dump employees onto the Obamacare exchanges. But now the IRS
has ruled that business will not be allowed to do this and this move
guarantees that companies will begin a massive wave of layoffs to make up
the costs.
An article in The New York Times relays the bad news to employers that no
matter what they thought they were going to do, they are stuck with the
massive new costs of Obamacare and they won’t be able to escape that
massive tax increase by just closing out their healthcare benefits.
“Many employers,” the Times reported on May 25,”had concluded that it
would be cheaper to provide each employee with a lump sum of money to buy
insurance on an exchange, instead of providing coverage directly.”
When employers provide coverage, their contributions, averaging more
than $5,000 a year per employee, are not counted as taxable income to
workers. But the Internal Revenue Service said employers could not meet
their obligations under the health care law by simply reimbursing employees
for some or all of their premium costs.
Christopher E. Condeluci, a former tax and benefits counsel to the
Senate Finance Committee, said the ruling was significant because it made
clear that “an employee cannot use tax-free contributions from an employer
to purchase an insurance policy sold in the individual health insurance
market, inside or outside an exchange.”
If an employer wants to help employees buy insurance on their own, Mr.
Condeluci said, it can give them higher pay, in the form of taxable wages.
But in such cases, he said, the employer and the employee would owe payroll
taxes on those wages, and the change could be viewed by workers as reducing
a valuable benefit.
So, what will employers do in response to this “clarification” of IRS
rules? Isn’t it obvious? They will begin to fire employees so that they can
use those salaries to pay for this massive new tax.
Obamacare will also eventually be responsible also for any new company
startup refusing to include healthcare as part of its compensation package
in the first place, too.
Of course, some may like the latter idea. After all, liberals have been
trying to decouple healthcare coverage from employment for a long, long time
. This is their biggest success with that goal to date.
But it will make healthcare more expensive for the individual. Not to
mention that perhaps tens of thousands of jobs will be permanently lost as a
result.
m********8
发帖数: 7463
2
资本家都太坏了
Z*****l
发帖数: 14069
3
要多买TZA.
1 (共1页)
进入USANews版参与讨论
相关主题
麦肯挽救了共和党奥巴马没能在OBAMACARE上整翻螺母泥
NY Doctors Sick Over ObamaCare: “It’s basically going to be a race to the bottom”大家的医疗保险涨价了么? Mine ^~80%
三德子这坏逼对中产阶级绝对是不利的。healthcare.gov总共登记了两万人
Big employers rethink their healthcare plans (ZZ)v5:美帝医疗开支3万亿 (转载)
Obamacare Will Cost Young People Thousands More Per YearObamacare涨价看看怎么影响大选
We need healthcare reform恭喜川普当选美国总统,希望他能推动全民公费医疗
damn obamacarePRE-EXISTING不移除,Permium必然升高,无解
For past 4 years, who's tax is raised by Obama?Trump的Healthcare Plan雏形
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: obamacare话题: massive话题: new话题: irs话题: employers