由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
USANews版 - 联邦法官竟然把美国宪法和独立宣言搞混了
相关主题
Obama’s DOJ Refuses to Affirm America’s Religious Freedoms美国学生欠缺历史知识
Re: 老将声嘶力竭的叫喊民主自由,可连最基本的民主自由的概念庆祝7月4日美国独立节
Judge Rejects Health Law荣炮:We Must Declare Independence (转载)
GOP candidates: Bashing judges, threatening democracy其实禁枪的依据很容易找,要用建国时期的“以己之矛,攻己己盾
72% Say It's Unconstitutional罗斯富 D-DAY PRAYER
盖洛普民调:大多数美国人支持voter ID lawsU.S. war in Iraq officially ends
‘So Called’ Judge,Trump想推翻三权分立,行政干预司法我是不需要我的爸爸还是不需要我的妈妈?
高院把9院判决推翻了Thomas Sowell: A Poignant Anniversary
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: judge话题: our
进入USANews版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
l****z
发帖数: 29846
1
Federal Judge Doesn’t Know Difference Between Constitution and Declaration
of Independence
February 15, 2014  by Warner Todd Huston
In an important decision striking down the votes of the people of Virginia,
a Federal Judge proved she didn’t known the difference between the
Constitution of the United States and the Declaration of Independence. Thank
you liberal educational establishment.
When U.S. District Judge Arenda L. Wright Allen issued her ruling taking
away the vote of the people of Virginia and maintaining that the state’s
affirmation of traditional, one man-one woman marriage was unconstitutional,
she insisted that it was because the U.S. Constitution said that all men
were created equal.
Of course, anyone with a fourth grade education knows that it is the not the
U.S. Constitution that makes this declaration but is instead the more aptly
named Declaration of Independence.
Here is how this “educated” judge began her cliché-laden opinion.
“A spirited and controversial debate is underway regarding who may
enjoy the right to marry un the United States of America, America has
pursued a journey to make and keep our citizens free, This journey has never
been easy, and at times has been painful and poignant, The ultimate
exercise of our freedom is choice. Our Constitution declares that “all men
” are created equal. Surely this means all of us.”
Well, this might have meant all of us if it was the Constitution that did
say that “all men are created equal.”
But, as I noted above, everyone–expect perhaps Judge Allen–knows that the
Constitution isn’t where that famous American philosophy is found. It’s
the Declaration, not the Constitution.
So, we have a judge responsible for making law based on our system, our
history, and our founding documents and this moron doesn’t know one
document from the next.
Yep. Thanks liberal educational establishment.
Of course, hours after the judge’s decision was released she hastily put
out another one to correct her idiotic error. But the Internet is forever.
1 (共1页)
进入USANews版参与讨论
相关主题
Thomas Sowell: A Poignant Anniversary72% Say It's Unconstitutional
Re: 米油不撤军什么条约都是放屁 (转载)盖洛普民调:大多数美国人支持voter ID laws
八马大师到底有没有出生证明,哪位藕粉催催?‘So Called’ Judge,Trump想推翻三权分立,行政干预司法
LEGAL AUTHORITIES—CONSTITUTIONAL BASIS OF MANDATORY VACCINATIO高院把9院判决推翻了
Obama’s DOJ Refuses to Affirm America’s Religious Freedoms美国学生欠缺历史知识
Re: 老将声嘶力竭的叫喊民主自由,可连最基本的民主自由的概念庆祝7月4日美国独立节
Judge Rejects Health Law荣炮:We Must Declare Independence (转载)
GOP candidates: Bashing judges, threatening democracy其实禁枪的依据很容易找,要用建国时期的“以己之矛,攻己己盾
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: judge话题: our