由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
USANews版 - Schiff: High Tax Rates Always Fail
相关主题
Study: Tax Cuts for the Rich Don't Spur Growth靠,芝加哥老黑们疯狂了
Why so much fighting about economicsDr. Andrew Weil
The Worst of Both: The Rise of High-Cost, Low-Capacity Rail Transit美华裔欲弃籍避政府追税 会计师劝诫小心反吃亏zz
下一个关键是Texas PrimaryDemocrats Vote Down 5 Percent Rule
Obama and Romney Outline Their Policies for Tech StartupsCNN:55%美国人支持亚利桑那州旨在抑制非法入境者的法案
副总统Biden:I challenge you:告诉我中国人有任何一件创新的(转载)如果盖茨巴菲特捐款不是为了逃税
Biden: Wealthy Americans Must Pay More Taxes to Show Patriotism谁能高速我
正确的bailout应如何执行纽约人为什么逃跑 作者:曹长青
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: percent话题: schiff话题: tax话题: taxes话题: wealthy
进入USANews版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
l****z
发帖数: 29846
1
1958年,3%高收入美国人收入占全部人口收入的14.7%,负担全部税赋的29.2%,2010年
收入占27.2%,税赋占51%
Sunday, December 9, 2012 06:58 PM
By: Dan Weil
As part of their argument for higher taxes on the wealthy, Democrats argue
that the economy was doing swimmingly in the 1950s, when the top marginal
rate was 91 percent.
But a look at the numbers shows that the wealthy weren’t actually paying
more taxes then than they are now, says Peter Schiff, CEO of Euro Capital.
“In 1958, the top 3 percent of taxpayers earned 14.7 percent of all
adjusted gross income and paid 29.2 percent of all federal income taxes,”
he writes in The Wall Street Journal.
“In 2010, the top 3 percent earned 27.2 percent of adjusted gross income,
and their share of all federal taxes rose proportionally, to 51 percent.”
How is that the case, given that the top rate is now 35 percent?
First, the middle and lower classes have a lighter tax burden than in the
past, Schiff says. And second, the wealthy didn’t actually pay 91 percent
taxes back in the day, thanks to generous exemptions, deductions and
shelters.
The lesson of all this: “Tax policies that diminish the incentives and
capacities of innovators, business owners and investors will not spur
economic improvement,” Schiff writes.
While most Republicans oppose a tax increase on the wealthy, some GOP
senators have expressed a willingness to give on the issue.
Sen. Bob Corker, a Tennessee Republican, told Fox News Sunday that it may
make sense to do so in return for Democrats’ agreement to cut entitlement
spending.
1 (共1页)
进入USANews版参与讨论
相关主题
纽约人为什么逃跑 作者:曹长青Obama and Romney Outline Their Policies for Tech Startups
共和党控制的美国众议院准备削减对外援助副总统Biden:I challenge you:告诉我中国人有任何一件创新的(转载)
共识!The Hill调查:95%美国选民认为削减债务是当前重要议题Biden: Wealthy Americans Must Pay More Taxes to Show Patriotism
WSJ:The Price of Taxing the Rich正确的bailout应如何执行
Study: Tax Cuts for the Rich Don't Spur Growth靠,芝加哥老黑们疯狂了
Why so much fighting about economicsDr. Andrew Weil
The Worst of Both: The Rise of High-Cost, Low-Capacity Rail Transit美华裔欲弃籍避政府追税 会计师劝诫小心反吃亏zz
下一个关键是Texas PrimaryDemocrats Vote Down 5 Percent Rule
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: percent话题: schiff话题: tax话题: taxes话题: wealthy