f******i
发帖数: 283 | 1 简单的说，共和党的政策根本在于创造，创造一切。政府是干什么的，对不起了，政府
部门工作的同学，政府就是吃闲饭的，政府一定要小。最好没有政府，当然不可能了。
民主党的根本在于分配：为了平均分配，要养无数的闲人，长此以往，僧多粥少。加州
是多么富饶的一个州，民主党搞的稀巴烂 |
m********i
发帖数: 301 | 2 偏偏左派就相信,
你家雇佣的割草工人--政府的avatar,
每个月从你这里拿钱
然后在到市场上买你做的东东
翻过来会让你更富裕
太....
政府很多时候是当路
的.是麻烦制造者
[发表自未名空间手机版 - m.mitbbs.com] |
k***n
发帖数: 3158 | 3 GOP: government should be as small as possible, but military should be
as large as possible.
Romney was saying that the US navy has less ships than it had in 1916,
so he wants to spend more on it. But this clown did not say that US spends
more than the next 13 countries combined on navy.
【在 f******i 的大作中提到】
: 简单的说，共和党的政策根本在于创造，创造一切。政府是干什么的，对不起了，政府
: 部门工作的同学，政府就是吃闲饭的，政府一定要小。最好没有政府，当然不可能了。
: 民主党的根本在于分配：为了平均分配，要养无数的闲人，长此以往，僧多粥少。加州
: 是多么富饶的一个州，民主党搞的稀巴烂
|
m********i
发帖数: 301 | 4 右派理念为什么对军队
支持.实际上是consistent.
右派认为要创造公平
竞争市场,必须保证市场
的安全.
[发表自未名空间手机版 - m.mitbbs.com]
【在 k***n 的大作中提到】
: GOP: government should be as small as possible, but military should be
: as large as possible.
: Romney was saying that the US navy has less ships than it had in 1916,
: so he wants to spend more on it. But this clown did not say that US spends
: more than the next 13 countries combined on navy.
|
C****n
发帖数: 2324 | 5 I agree with Romney.
Government should be as small as possible, and the military should be as big
as possible.
That's right strategy to survive on this planet. The fact that the USA is
not as strong as it was before, the right way is to enhance its military!
It's not good to China, not good to any other country in the world, but it's
good for America.
【在 k***n 的大作中提到】
: GOP: government should be as small as possible, but military should be
: as large as possible.
: Romney was saying that the US navy has less ships than it had in 1916,
: so he wants to spend more on it. But this clown did not say that US spends
: more than the next 13 countries combined on navy.
|
k***n
发帖数: 3158 | 6 spending more than the next 13 countries combined is still not enough
for you to feel safe, lol
government is not efficient running anything, but all of a sudden,
it got a clue on running military effeiciently.
I guess Rumsfeld is laughing his ass off
【在 m********i 的大作中提到】
: 右派理念为什么对军队
: 支持.实际上是consistent.
: 右派认为要创造公平
: 竞争市场,必须保证市场
: 的安全.
:
: [发表自未名空间手机版 - m.mitbbs.com]
|
x***1
发帖数: 139 | 7 没有军费支持， 苏联会倒台吗？
美元是硬通货吗？ 石油是只用美元交易吗？
【在 k***n 的大作中提到】
: spending more than the next 13 countries combined is still not enough
: for you to feel safe, lol
: government is not efficient running anything, but all of a sudden,
: it got a clue on running military effeiciently.
: I guess Rumsfeld is laughing his ass off
|
c******t
发帖数: 2478 | 8 我在得州和加州呆过，加州比得州差好多。
【在 f******i 的大作中提到】
: 简单的说，共和党的政策根本在于创造，创造一切。政府是干什么的，对不起了，政府
: 部门工作的同学，政府就是吃闲饭的，政府一定要小。最好没有政府，当然不可能了。
: 民主党的根本在于分配：为了平均分配，要养无数的闲人，长此以往，僧多粥少。加州
: 是多么富饶的一个州，民主党搞的稀巴烂
|
k***n
发帖数: 3158 | 9 苏联会倒台 was indeed due to its over spending on military
US dollar as the reserve currency will eventually back fire
【在 x***1 的大作中提到】
: 没有军费支持， 苏联会倒台吗？
: 美元是硬通货吗？ 石油是只用美元交易吗？
|
p****x
发帖数: 1376 | 10 have you ever thought over in your small brain why soviet union over-spent
on military?
【在 k***n 的大作中提到】
: 苏联会倒台 was indeed due to its over spending on military
: US dollar as the reserve currency will eventually back fire
|
|
|
k***n
发帖数: 3158 | 11 the very few who were in power wanted to use money from all tax payers
on military and rob other countries so that they can fill their own
pockets, maybe leave a little bit leftovers to the average citizens.
the same thing has been happening in the US and many GOP supporters
seems OK with it, lol
【在 p****x 的大作中提到】
: have you ever thought over in your small brain why soviet union over-spent
: on military?
|
p****x
发帖数: 1376 | 12 lol，天真的小左从来不看历史。没有美国强大军事压力，苏联会over spending？没有
美国强大军力，美国有现在的经济实力和政治实力？
【在 k***n 的大作中提到】
: the very few who were in power wanted to use money from all tax payers
: on military and rob other countries so that they can fill their own
: pockets, maybe leave a little bit leftovers to the average citizens.
: the same thing has been happening in the US and many GOP supporters
: seems OK with it, lol
|
k***n
发帖数: 3158 | 13 US became the richest country in the world before the beginning of
the 20th centrury when there were no income tax and the US military
power was nowhere near its rank today.
you have no clue regarding history
【在 p****x 的大作中提到】
: lol，天真的小左从来不看历史。没有美国强大军事压力，苏联会over spending？没有
: 美国强大军力，美国有现在的经济实力和政治实力？
|
l****z
发帖数: 29846 | 14 那个是什么时候? 那个时候美国孤立主义没问题.现在这么globalized还行得通嘛?
【在 k***n 的大作中提到】
: US became the richest country in the world before the beginning of
: the 20th centrury when there were no income tax and the US military
: power was nowhere near its rank today.
: you have no clue regarding history
|
l****z
发帖数: 29846 | 15 那么现在美国overspending welfare不是更要倒台?
【在 k***n 的大作中提到】
: 苏联会倒台 was indeed due to its over spending on military
: US dollar as the reserve currency will eventually back fire
|
g********w
发帖数: 2539 | 16 左棍都是傻逼，period 没有美帝现在石油就是卢布结算。
【在 p****x 的大作中提到】
: lol，天真的小左从来不看历史。没有美国强大军事压力，苏联会over spending？没有
: 美国强大军力，美国有现在的经济实力和政治实力？
|
L*******e
发帖数: 334 | 17 In history, every No.1 falled down because over spending, mostly
overspending in military.
Over spending in military makes a country unsafe, not safer.
I will vote for Romney this time, because I think he will spend less than
Obama, even he doesn't cut military spending.
If he cuts military spending, it would be better. No cut for military is the
only thing I don't like Romney. |
p**j
发帖数: 7063 | 18 连共产党都知道，四个现代化里面包括国防现代化。军力是一个国家综合国力的重要一
方面，政府规模不属于综合国力的任何方面。为了保证经济发展，未来可能的军事对手
，最好要扼杀在萌芽状态，否则，就需要二战，冷战这样耗费人力物力财力的战争，军
备竞赛。军费是你现在不投资，将来需要大投资，还要搭上更多人命。
【在 k***n 的大作中提到】
: GOP: government should be as small as possible, but military should be
: as large as possible.
: Romney was saying that the US navy has less ships than it had in 1916,
: so he wants to spend more on it. But this clown did not say that US spends
: more than the next 13 countries combined on navy.
|
k***n
发帖数: 3158 | 19 cutting from a level that is more than the next 13 countries combined
is considered "你现在不投资，将来需要大投资，还要搭上更多人命"
do you really believe this shit? lol
even you do want to spend more on military, as GOP always says, government
is not efficient on running things. why in a sudden it can run military
so well?
indeed, they run it so well that they could not track $2.3 trillions in
2001. who knows how much has been lost in the behind the door transactions.
【在 p**j 的大作中提到】
: 连共产党都知道，四个现代化里面包括国防现代化。军力是一个国家综合国力的重要一
: 方面，政府规模不属于综合国力的任何方面。为了保证经济发展，未来可能的军事对手
: ，最好要扼杀在萌芽状态，否则，就需要二战，冷战这样耗费人力物力财力的战争，军
: 备竞赛。军费是你现在不投资，将来需要大投资，还要搭上更多人命。
|
m******O
发帖数: 596 | 20 At that time, US's national interest was limited in the scope of North
America continent, while nowadays it is global.
At that time, there's no nuclear weapons, no long range missiles, no
strategic bombers and no aircraft carriers that could allow the challengers
reach US shore easily, while nowadays there are more than two dozen
countries have such capability.
At that time, there's no Communism, Nazism and Islamic Extremism that sought
global influence and power.
Ignore those facts and talk about how "peaceful" we could be, not only means
have no clue regarding history, it also reflects lack of understanding of
our current surrounding.
【在 k***n 的大作中提到】
: US became the richest country in the world before the beginning of
: the 20th centrury when there were no income tax and the US military
: power was nowhere near its rank today.
: you have no clue regarding history
|
