l****z
发帖数: 29846 | 1 May 19, 2012 Posted by Kevin
Need more proof that the Environmental Protection Agency is out of control?
Friday they released a draft scientific study of the Bristol Bay watershed
and its natural resources, conducted solely to form the basis for
preemptively vetoing the Pebble Mine in Alaska. The group that is developing
Pebble Mine hasn’t even formally submitted a proposal for permitting. Here
’s are some details from the AP on this massive overstep of EPA power:
JUNEAU, Alaska — The possible failure of a dam holding waste from a
large-scale mine near the headwaters of one of the world’s premier salmon
fisheries in Alaska could wipe out or degrade rivers and streams in the
region for decades, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency said in a draft
watershed assessment released Friday.
EPA regional administrator Dennis McLerran said there was a fairly low
risk of that occurring, however, and the more likely impact would be direct
loss of habitat from the mining activity itself.
The report responded to concerns about a large copper-and-gold prospect
near the headwaters of Bristol Bay. It is a draft, with a final report that
could affect permitting decisions perhaps due by the end of the year after
public comment and peer review.
So what does the EPA say about the report?
Under the Clean Water Act, EPA has the authority and responsibility to
protect the nation’s water and perform scientific studies that enhance the
agency’s and the public’s knowledge of water resources. EPA’s focus in
the assessment is scientific and technical; the agency has made no judgments
about the use of its regulatory authority under the Clean Water Act and the
draft study in no way prejudges future consideration of proposed mining
activities.
You mean the authority that the Supreme Court just bitch-slapped you for
abusing? Yep, the same…
The groundwork they’re laying implies that any building or project that
could potentially impact water can be killed by the EPA without the project
ever going through the permitting process, and without input from state,
local, or other federal agencies. This in itself is a jobs and economy
killer.
An article from Inside the EPA (subscription required) shows that
environmentalists couldn’t be happier, and want the EPA to use this plan to
kill other projects…
“Environmentalists are now calling on the agency to conduct a similar
assessment of mining activity in the Great Lakes region. The Bristol Bay
study “is comparable to what we’d like to see” in the Great Lakes,
National Wildlife Federation (NWF) attorney Michelle Halley said on a May 10
conference call.”
It’s no coincidence that this is happening now, as President Obama is
looking for massive bucks from the enviromentalist crowd to get re-elected.
An interesting side note from the report is that the Pebble Mine operation
would have no impact on subsistence salmon fishing for the native population.
The Bristol Bay region’s salmon populations also support significant
subsistence and recreational sport fisheries. For example, from 1990 to 2010
, annual subsistence harvest averaged 140,767 salmon across all species, 78%
of which were sockeye (Dye and Schwanke 2009, Salomone et al. 2011).
No subsistence salmon fisheries are documented in the mine footprint.
In summary, it is unlikely that there would be significant loss of
salmon subsistence resources related to the mine footprint. Habitat
modification in areas downstream of the mine site (Section 5.2) would have
related impacts on downstream subsistence users. Some changes to salmon
subsistence activities likely would result from development of the
transportation corridor. In addition to the actual changes in subsistence
resources, based on interviews with Tribal Elders, subsistence use could
decrease downstream of the mine footprint, based solely on the perception
that the salmon are being affected by the mine operation. Subsistence use
could also decrease if fluctuations in downstream water levels reduce access
for subsistence activities. Although this assessment is focused on salmon,
the non-salmon-related impacts on Alaska Native cultures from routine mine
operation are likely to be more significant, including cultural changes
resulting from a shift to a market economy, increased access to the area,
and direct effects on non-salmon subsistence resources.
The most important sentance of the 339 page report is highlighted above, “
this assessment is focused on salmon.” It’s not the assessment of
watershed, the effects of the overall ecosystem of the region, it’s simply
a report on commercial salmon fishing in the area. Given that, this section
is telling…
The effects of mining on fish populations could not be quantified
because of the lack of quantitative information concerning salmon, char, and
trout populations and their responses. The occurrence of salmonid species
in rivers and major streams is generally known, but not their abundances,
productivities, or limiting factors. Estimating changes in populations would
require population modeling, which requires knowledge of life-stage-
specific survival and production as well as knowledge of limiting factors
and processes that were not available for this case.
Which is bureaucratic speak for “try as we might we could find or invent a
quantifiable effect.” | P*********0
发帖数: 4321 | 2 Very nice move
?
developing
Here
★ 发自iPhone App: ChineseWeb - 中文网站浏览器
【在 l****z 的大作中提到】
: May 19, 2012 Posted by Kevin
: Need more proof that the Environmental Protection Agency is out of control?
: Friday they released a draft scientific study of the Bristol Bay watershed
: and its natural resources, conducted solely to form the basis for
: preemptively vetoing the Pebble Mine in Alaska. The group that is developing
: Pebble Mine hasn’t even formally submitted a proposal for permitting. Here
: ’s are some details from the AP on this massive overstep of EPA power:
: JUNEAU, Alaska — The possible failure of a dam holding waste from a
: large-scale mine near the headwaters of one of the world’s premier salmon
: fisheries in Alaska could wipe out or degrade rivers and streams in the
|
|
