boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
USANews版 - The Non-Green Jobs Boom
相关主题
The Wolves In Obama’s Camp Begin Turning On Him
liberals 就是搞不清,美帝的问题不是福利制度问题
BOOM: Donald Trump’s Pick For Attorney General… Liberals’ Worst Nightmare
What jobs will not be exported at large scale? (转载)
美国的经济是如何走向全面破产的 zz
提倡多给穷人福利可以提高需求的可以看看这个
因为GOP的税改要多交几千
Tax Cuts, Not the Clinton Tax Hike, Produced the 1990s Boom
如何使liberal愤怒.
Liberal Hate
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: jobs话题: oil话题: obama话题: energy话题: gas
进入USANews版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
l****z
发帖数: 29846
1
Forget 'clean energy.' Oil and gas are boosting U.S. employment.
o President Obama was right all along. Domestic energy production really is
a path to prosperity and new job creation. His mistake was predicting that
those new jobs would be "green," when the real employment boom is taking
place in oil and gas.
The Bureau of Labor Statistics reported recently that the U.S. jobless rate
remains a dreadful 9%. But look more closely at the data and you can see
which industries are bucking the jobless trend. One is oil and gas
production, which now employs some 440,000 workers, an 80% increase, or 200,
000 more jobs, since 2003. Oil and gas jobs account for more than one in
five of all net new private jobs in that period.
The ironies here are richer than the shale deposits in North Dakota's Bakken
formation. While Washington has tried to force-feed renewable energy with
tens of billions in special subsidies, oil and gas production has boomed
thanks to private investment. And while renewable technology breakthroughs
never seem to arrive, horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing have
revolutionized oil and gas extraction—with no Energy Department loan
guarantees needed.
The oil and gas rush has led to a jobs boom. North Dakota has the nation's
lowest jobless rate, at 3.5%, and the state now has some 200 rigs pumping
440,000 barrels of oil a day, four times the amount in 2006. The state
reports more than 16,000 current job openings, and places like Williston
have become meccas for workers seeking jobs that often pay more than $100,
000 a year.
Or take production in Pennsylvania's Marcellus shale formation, which the
state Department of Labor and Industry says created 18,000 new jobs in the
first half of 2011. Some 214,000 jobs are now tied to a natural gas industry
that barely existed in the Keystone State a decade ago. Energy firms are
also rushing to develop the Utica shale in eastern Ohio, and they are
expanding operations in Texas, Louisiana and Oklahoma, among other places.
Enlarge Image
1energyjobs
1energyjobs
Bloomberg News
Good news? You'd think so, but liberals can't seem to handle this truth so
they are now trying to discredit the jobs that accompany it. The American
Petroleum Institute recently commissioned a study by the Wood Mackenzie
consulting firm, which estimated that better federal energy policy would
create an additional 1.4 million jobs by 2030.
This has caused a fury on the political left, which complains that the study
included estimates of direct and indirect jobs (such as equipment suppliers
) but also "induced" jobs, or jobs created when oil workers spend their
salaries at, say, hotels, restaurants or bowling alleys. It seems these
claims rely on—drum roll, please—"multipliers" to produce estimates of
knock-on jobs.
Liberals know all about multipliers, which are the central operating conceit
of modern Keynesian economics. The entire public justification for the $820
billion Obama stimulus was the claim that every $1 of spending would have a
multiplier effect of 1.5 or more and thus create millions of new jobs.
That looks like a joke now. But Democrats and liberals continue to cite the
black-box multiplier claims of Moody's Mark Zandi, who says the latest Obama
jobs bill will create 1.9 million jobs. Some 750,000 of those jobs are
supposed to appear merely from extending the payroll tax holiday for workers
, giving them more money to spend on, say, hotels or restaurants or bowling
alleys. All such multipliers are suspect, but the liberals can't have it
both ways and invoke them to justify government spending but then repudiate
them for private business.
In any case the beauty of the oil and gas boom is that multipliers aren't
needed to predict job growth. It's happening right before our eyes. And it
stands to reason that if the Obama Administration dropped its hostility to
oil and gas energy, even more jobs would be created as the industry invested
to exploit other areas with new technology and production methods.
Yet earlier this month the Interior Department released a new five-year plan
that puts most of the Outer Continental Shelf off-limits for oil drilling.
And the Administration has delayed for at least another year the Keystone XL
pipeline that is shovel-ready to create 20,000 new direct, pipeline-related
jobs.
The Office of Natural Resources Revenue recently noted that federal revenue
from offshore bonus bids (from lease sales) in fiscal 2011 was merely $36
million—down from $9.5 billion in fiscal 2008. The Obama Administration has
managed the nearly impossible feat of turning energy policy into a money
loser, pouring taxpayer dollars into green-energy busts like Solyndra. The
Washington Post reported in September that Mr. Obama's $38.6 billion green
loan program had created a mere 3,500 jobs over two years. He had predicted
it would "save or create" 65,000.
Mr. Obama nonetheless keeps talking about "green jobs" as if repetition will
conjure them. He'd do more for the economy if he dropped the ideological
illusions and embraced the job-creating, wealth-producing reality of
domestic fossil fuels.
1 (共1页)
进入USANews版参与讨论
相关主题
Liberal Hate
事实证明:奥地利学派是正确的
ron paul从audit FED做为突破口
Keynesian endpoint within sight (转载)
WSJ檄文- “The Obama Economy ”
Scientists Find 'Liberal Gene' (转载)
Scanning The Political Scene As We Approach Elections
liberal 挺逗的
All The News That Is Unfit to Print
政府注资不能从根本上解决经济衰退 (转载)
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: jobs话题: oil话题: obama话题: energy话题: gas