W********m
发帖数: 7793 | 1 =================
Full Tilt No-Limit Hold'em, $1.00 BB (9 handed) - Full Tilt Converter
SB ($95.80)
Hero (BB) ($118.75)
UTG ($100)
UTG+1 ($100.50)
MP1 ($103)
MP2 ($51.90)
MP3 ($132)
CO ($41.50)
Button ($139.35)
Preflop: Hero is BB with 7d, Qc
6 folds, Button bets $2, 1 fold, Hero raises to $8, Button calls $6
Flop: ($16.50) 3d, 7c, 9c (2 players)
Hero bets $10, Button calls $10
Turn: ($36.50) 5d (2 players)
Hero checks, Button bets $20, Hero calls $20
River: ($76.50) Ad (2 players)
Hero checks, Button checks
Total pot: $76.50 | Rake: $3
Results:
Button had 6h, 6c (one pair, sixes).
Hero had 7d, Qc (one pair, sevens).
Outcome: Hero won $73.50 | y**t
发帖数: 205 | 2 88 in his range too
【在 W********m 的大作中提到】
: =================
: Full Tilt No-Limit Hold'em, $1.00 BB (9 handed) - Full Tilt Converter
: SB ($95.80)
: Hero (BB) ($118.75)
: UTG ($100)
: UTG+1 ($100.50)
: MP1 ($103)
: MP2 ($51.90)
: MP3 ($132)
: CO ($41.50)
| h*******s
发帖数: 3932 | 3 This proves my theory: if villain show weakness on turn then check river
first, you need to strong bet anything worse than mid pair. He's not going
to call very often, and raise is almost impossible.
【在 W********m 的大作中提到】
: =================
: Full Tilt No-Limit Hold'em, $1.00 BB (9 handed) - Full Tilt Converter
: SB ($95.80)
: Hero (BB) ($118.75)
: UTG ($100)
: UTG+1 ($100.50)
: MP1 ($103)
: MP2 ($51.90)
: MP3 ($132)
: CO ($41.50)
| W********m
发帖数: 7793 | 4 make sense. This guy obvious knows this theory very well.. lol
http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t/TexasHoldem/31199449.html
【在 h*******s 的大作中提到】
: This proves my theory: if villain show weakness on turn then check river
: first, you need to strong bet anything worse than mid pair. He's not going
: to call very often, and raise is almost impossible.
| h*******s
发帖数: 3932 | 5 hehe, after such call, we need to note "this guy makes hero call.."
【在 W********m 的大作中提到】
: make sense. This guy obvious knows this theory very well.. lol
: http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t/TexasHoldem/31199449.html
|
|
