d**x
发帖数: 1934 | 1 one hand last night.0.1/0.25
me UTG+1 $15, UTG $40
i just got on the table, so no observation of UTG's style.
hole card KcKd
UTG raised to $1, I raised to $3. All other folded. UTG reraised to $6, I
called.
Q1:Should I all-in now?
Flop:
3c4h10d
UTG raised $10 which is all-in for me.
Q2: Should I all-in or fold? | m******1
发帖数: 715 | | f*****g
发帖数: 15860 | 3 you're playing short stack strategy (60BB), so this is auto all-in pre-flop.
in harrington's cash game books, he specifically mentioned this in vol I. he
said (not exact words): "don't feel lucky/good/heroic when you lay down KK
in this situation, and then see your opponent show AA" ... " because in the
long term, you'll fold a lot of times to QQ, AK, AQ, JJ alike too and it
will cost you more money...". he also said, the chance that you have KK and
somebody has AA at the same time is about 1%.
【在 d**x 的大作中提到】
: one hand last night.0.1/0.25
: me UTG+1 $15, UTG $40
: i just got on the table, so no observation of UTG's style.
: hole card KcKd
: UTG raised to $1, I raised to $3. All other folded. UTG reraised to $6, I
: called.
: Q1:Should I all-in now?
: Flop:
: 3c4h10d
: UTG raised $10 which is all-in for me.
| d**x
发帖数: 1934 | 4 my harrington's book will be delivered today...
nvmd, all-ined after flop... UTG shows KA.
flop.
he
KK
the
and
t
【在 f*****g 的大作中提到】
: you're playing short stack strategy (60BB), so this is auto all-in pre-flop.
: in harrington's cash game books, he specifically mentioned this in vol I. he
: said (not exact words): "don't feel lucky/good/heroic when you lay down KK
: in this situation, and then see your opponent show AA" ... " because in the
: long term, you'll fold a lot of times to QQ, AK, AQ, JJ alike too and it
: will cost you more money...". he also said, the chance that you have KK and
: somebody has AA at the same time is about 1%.
| f*****g
发帖数: 15860 | 5 really good books, i used to think his tournament books are too conservative
. but his cash game books are very different.
i would leave a note for this player. i only play at tables where at least 2
-3 players are marked by me as this, lol.
even he turned or rivered you with an A, don't feel bad about it. poker is
all about probabilities, if you make the right decisions at favorable times,
you'll be a winner. you play with a system (which can win 7/10 times), not
just hands (you still lose one
【在 d**x 的大作中提到】
: my harrington's book will be delivered today...
: nvmd, all-ined after flop... UTG shows KA.
:
: flop.
: he
: KK
: the
: and
: t
| c********e
发帖数: 267 | | c********e
发帖数: 267 | 7 River A? :)
【在 d**x 的大作中提到】
: my harrington's book will be delivered today...
: nvmd, all-ined after flop... UTG shows KA.
:
: flop.
: he
: KK
: the
: and
: t
| w***w
发帖数: 6301 | 8 I don't think harrington is correct at this situation. And I don't think QQ
, AK, AQ, JJ would 3-bet preflop, I mean there may be some players doing that
but most players don't do that.
I do think the opponent could have AA, but since the pot is too big compared
with allin amount,this is a call anyway.
flop.
he
KK
the
and
t
【在 f*****g 的大作中提到】
: you're playing short stack strategy (60BB), so this is auto all-in pre-flop.
: in harrington's cash game books, he specifically mentioned this in vol I. he
: said (not exact words): "don't feel lucky/good/heroic when you lay down KK
: in this situation, and then see your opponent show AA" ... " because in the
: long term, you'll fold a lot of times to QQ, AK, AQ, JJ alike too and it
: will cost you more money...". he also said, the chance that you have KK and
: somebody has AA at the same time is about 1%.
| p*******p
发帖数: 13670 | 9 all in preflop, as played, all in on flop
【在 d**x 的大作中提到】
: one hand last night.0.1/0.25
: me UTG+1 $15, UTG $40
: i just got on the table, so no observation of UTG's style.
: hole card KcKd
: UTG raised to $1, I raised to $3. All other folded. UTG reraised to $6, I
: called.
: Q1:Should I all-in now?
: Flop:
: 3c4h10d
: UTG raised $10 which is all-in for me.
| c**********l
发帖数: 606 | 10 yeah, all-in in both cases.
harrington's cash game books are the best, very clear, great examples.
Sklansky and miller's book (Theory and Practice) is great and deeper than
harrington's, as well as David's classic Poker theory for advanced players.
basically all the theories are covered in David's books, while harrington
explains things in a much more digestable way.
i would say harrington for debutants/journeymans, and Sklansky when you have
100k+ hands and at least a winrate of 2ptBB/100 at N | f*****g
发帖数: 15860 | 11 i like ed miller's aricles too, a lot of wisdom.
.
have
back
【在 c**********l 的大作中提到】
: yeah, all-in in both cases.
: harrington's cash game books are the best, very clear, great examples.
: Sklansky and miller's book (Theory and Practice) is great and deeper than
: harrington's, as well as David's classic Poker theory for advanced players.
: basically all the theories are covered in David's books, while harrington
: explains things in a much more digestable way.
: i would say harrington for debutants/journeymans, and Sklansky when you have
: 100k+ hands and at least a winrate of 2ptBB/100 at N
|
|
