x**y
发帖数: 644 | 1 总理输了的话， 三人都是2胜一负，为啥老衲不能晋级？ | r*******y
发帖数: 5777 | 2 净胜盘数
纳达尔是4:4
其他两个人 5:2 4:2
【在 x**y 的大作中提到】
: 总理输了的话， 三人都是2胜一负，为啥老衲不能晋级？
| a*****0
发帖数: 133 | 3 SEMI-FINAL QUALIFYING PROCEDURE
The final standings of each group shall be determined by the first of the
following methods that apply:
a) Greatest number of wins;
b) Greatest number of matches played;
Comment: 2-1 won-loss record beats a 2-0 won-loss record; a 1-2 record
beats a 1-0 record.
c) Head-to-head results if only two (2) players are tied,
d) If three (3) players are tied, then:
If three (3) players each have one (1) win, a player having played less than
all three (3) matches is automatically eliminated and the player advancing
to the single elimination competition is the winner of the match-up of the
two (2) players tied with 1-2 records; or
Highest percentage of sets won; or
Highest percentage of games won; or
The player positions on the Emirates ATP Rankings as of the Monday after the
last ATP World Tour tournament of the calendar year.
If (i), (ii), (iii) or (iv) produce one (1) superior player (first place),
or one (1) inferior player (third place), and the two (2) remaining players
are tied, the tie between those two (2) players shall be broken by head-to-
head record.
Comment 1: 1 player has 3 wins and the other 3 players have 1 win. Of the 3
players with 1 win, 1 player has only played in 2 matches while the other 2
players have played 3 matches. The player who has only played 2 matches is
eliminated and then the 2 remaining players revert back to head-to-head
results with the winner of their match advancing to the semi-finals.
Comment 2: 1 player has 3 wins and the other 3 players have 1 win and they
all have played 3 matches.
The tie-break for % of sets won has 1 player with a better % than the other
two. This player advances to the semi-final round.
Comment 3: 3 players have 2 wins and the other player has 0 wins. The player
with 0 wins is eliminated. Of the 3 players with 2 wins, they are ordered
by their % of sets won. This produces a 1, 2 & 3 order and the players
finishing 1 and 2 move to the semi-final round and the player finishing 3 in
% of sets won is eliminated. The player with the best % of sets won is the
winner of the group.
Comment 4: 3 players have 2 wins and the other player has 0 wins. The player
with 0 wins is eliminated. Of the 3 players with 2 wins, 1 player’s sets
won-loss is 5-2 for 71.43%; the other 2 players both have a 4-3 record in
sets for 57.14%. In this case there is 1 superior player (71.43%) and the
remaining 2 players are tied; it now reverts to the head to head result of
the 2 remaining players with the winning player advancing as group runner-up.
Comment 5: 3 players have 2 wins and the other player has 0 wins. The player
with 0 wins is eliminated. Of the 3 players with 2 wins, 2 have set won-
loss records of 5-3 (62.5%) while the other player is 4-3 (57.14%). In this
case we have 1 inferior player (57.14%) and he is eliminated. The remaining
two players both advance to the semi-finals with the winner of their head-to
-head match advancing as the group winner.
Comment 6: 3 players have 2 wins and the other player has 0 wins. The player
with 0 wins is eliminated. Of the 3 players with 2 wins, all have played 3
matches and all 3 have set won-loss records of 5-4 (55.56%). In this case we
move to % of games won. The % of games won breaks down like this: 44-40 for
52.38%, 45-43 for 51.14% and 44-43 for 50.57%. This produces a 1, 2 and 3
order of the group and the number 1 player in % of games won is the group
winner while the player finishing 2nd in % of games won advances to the semi
-finals as the group runner-up. The player with the 3rd best % of games won
is eliminated.
【在 x**y 的大作中提到】
: 总理输了的话， 三人都是2胜一负，为啥老衲不能晋级？
| s****h
发帖数: 3979 | 4 按这个看，三人都是2胜，
需要算三场比赛的set数
而不是只算对tiebreak其他两人的set数
里面的例子，set数5/2, 4/3都不是两场比赛打得出来的。
感觉不太合理啊。 | f**********g
发帖数: 1056 | 5 没啥不公平的。豆子第一场输得太多太快了。赢的两场又太惊险太接近了。他进去了，
对其他两个才叫不公平。小组赛本来都这样的。
: 按这个看，三人都是2胜，
: 需要算三场比赛的set数
: 而不是只算对tiebreak其他两人的set数
: 里面的例子，set数5/2, 4/3都不是两场比赛打得出来的。
: 感觉不太合理啊。
【在 s****h 的大作中提到】
: 按这个看，三人都是2胜，
: 需要算三场比赛的set数
: 而不是只算对tiebreak其他两人的set数
: 里面的例子，set数5/2, 4/3都不是两场比赛打得出来的。
: 感觉不太合理啊。
|
|
