|
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
d******o
发帖数: 147 | 1 【 以下文字转载自 USANews 讨论区 】
发信人: taylorlee (轻型农民), 信区: USANews
标 题: 奥巴马要求公立学校无条件免费接收非法移民上学
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Fri May 9 14:01:24 2014, 美东)
奥巴马以及其鹰犬Eric Holder要求公立学校无条件免费接收非法移民上学。非法移民
不需要提供任何年龄，身份，以及住址的证明，就可以任意选择公立学校。当然公立学
校的开销是当地居民的地产税支付的。
形成鲜明对比的是，一名Ohio的美国公民却因为伪造住址证明把孩子送到更好的学区上
学而进了监狱。http://www.cnn.com/2011/OPINION/01/29/martin.ohio.mother/
民主党损害中产的利益来讨好非法移民的丑恶嘴脸再一次暴露无遗。
The Obama administration pointedly told American public schools on Thursday
that they must enroll the children of illegal immigrants despite little to
nothing in the way of legitimate documentation concerning how old the kids
are or where they live.
The lecture came from Attorney General Eric Holder and Education Secretary
Arne Duncan, according to a Department of Justice press release obtained by
The Daily Caller.
In their joint statement, Holder and Duncan announced updated federal
guidance informing officials at taxpayer-funded K-12 schools about new,
federally permissible enrollment practices. The updated guidance stresses
the need for flexibility in choosing which documents illegal immigrant
parents can submit to show a child’s age or whether the child actually even
lives within a school’s attendance boundary.
The new guidance specifically stresses that school districts cannot require
certain legal documents including a parent’s state-issued driver’s license
any time it might prevent a child from enrolling because of a parent’s
illegal immigration status.
“The message here is clear,” Duncan said. “Let all children who live in
your district enroll in your public schools.”
“Three decades ago, the Supreme Court issued a historic ruling – in the
case of Plyler v. Doe – that legislation denying children an education
based on immigration status ‘does not comport with fundamental conceptions
of justice,’” said Holder in remarks delivered on Thursday.
Plyler v. Doe, a 1982 case, was a class action, filed on behalf of a group
of school-aged Mexican children in Smith County, Texas who could not
establish that they had been legally admitted to the United States.
Justice William Brennan wrote the Court’s 5-to-4 majority ruling.
The slim majority concluded that a Texas law preventing the children of
illegal immigrants from attending public schools was unconstitutional
because denying the children basic education contributes to “the creation
and perpetuation of a subclass of illiterates within our boundaries.” Thus,
The Lone Star State could not show that the law served a “substantial
state interest” — the legal lingo for the constitutional test applied in
cases involving illegal aliens.
“Sheer incapability or lax enforcement of the laws barring entry into this
country, coupled with the failure to establish an effective bar to the
employment of undocumented aliens, has resulted in the creation of a
substantial ‘shadow population’ of illegal migrants – numbering in the
millions – within our borders,” Brennan, a leader of the Court’s liberal
wing, wrote.
On Thursday, Holder went on to say that the federal government has “
continued to hear troubling reports of actions taken by school districts
around the country that have a chilling effect on student enrollment,
raising barriers for undocumented children and children from immigrant
families who seek to receive the public education to which they are entitled
.”
The attorney general said his department will now double down on ensuring
that illegal immigrant children are allowed to attend taxpayer-funded
American schools.
“Public school districts have an obligation to enroll students regardless
of immigration status and without discrimination on the basis of race, color
or national origin,” Holder proclaimed. “The Justice Department will do
everything it can to make sure schools meet this obligation. We will
vigilantly enforce the law to ensure the schoolhouse door remains open to
all.”
Holder also invoked Brown v. Board of Education, the landmark 1954 Supreme
Court case declaring that state laws establishing separate public schools
for black and white students are unconstitutional, in support of the rights
of the children of illegal immigrants to attend public schools despite a
lack of documentation concerning age or address.
http://news.yahoo.com/white-house-tells-public-schools-enroll-i | d******o
发帖数: 147 | 2 The updated guidance stresses the need for flexibility in choosing which
documents illegal immigrant parents can submit to show a child’s age or
whether the child actually even lives within a school’s attendance boundary.
民主党主政的社会公理何在？这不是明抢吗？政府不执行现有的移民法，不遣返非法移
民，反而滥发福利收买选票。我们老实交税的人还不能有任何怨言，否则就被扣上“种
族主义者”，“反对移民权利”，“恨穷人”，“恨移民”，“恨妇女”的大帽子。
2016不把民主党赶下台，天理难容！ | n****l
发帖数: 6652 | 3 no zuo no die
boundary.
【在 d******o 的大作中提到】
: The updated guidance stresses the need for flexibility in choosing which
: documents illegal immigrant parents can submit to show a child’s age or
: whether the child actually even lives within a school’s attendance boundary.
: 民主党主政的社会公理何在？这不是明抢吗？政府不执行现有的移民法，不遣返非法移
: 民，反而滥发福利收买选票。我们老实交税的人还不能有任何怨言，否则就被扣上“种
: 族主义者”，“反对移民权利”，“恨穷人”，“恨移民”，“恨妇女”的大帽子。
: 2016不把民主党赶下台，天理难容！
| m********8
发帖数: 7463 | 4 兹有墨西哥人，私入我境，虽无官文牒照，但其心也善，不远万里投奔我邦，实为太平
盛世，四海归心之兆。必须等同视之，所谓治世以仁，佛光普照，以彰显皇恩之浩荡！
boundary.
【在 d******o 的大作中提到】
: The updated guidance stresses the need for flexibility in choosing which
: documents illegal immigrant parents can submit to show a child’s age or
: whether the child actually even lives within a school’s attendance boundary.
: 民主党主政的社会公理何在？这不是明抢吗？政府不执行现有的移民法，不遣返非法移
: 民，反而滥发福利收买选票。我们老实交税的人还不能有任何怨言，否则就被扣上“种
: 族主义者”，“反对移民权利”，“恨穷人”，“恨移民”，“恨妇女”的大帽子。
: 2016不把民主党赶下台，天理难容！
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
