由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
SanFrancisco版 - 禁枪的请进
相关主题
大家注意到他们死于家门口吗? (转载)转旧帖:为什么加州会破产而德州不会?
各位,举手之劳,帮助PK为什么加州会破产而德州不会?
求救出车祸后修车和善后处理问题昨天左派在白宫门口公开聚众吸毒 (转载)
“末日博士”鲁比尼说他预测的全球经济“完美风暴”正在展开 (转载)95014 迎2000亿关税,砍20万房价,求套现
求推荐mountain view, san jose附近好的car auto body shopBad news for California home owner ?
trump改革真的要开始了 (转载)It Begins: Florida Set To Change The Rules Of Its Retirement System
msj 有一个十一年级的女生自杀?Prop 24
国内网友太有才: 总结为什么加州会破产而德州不会今天投票(propositions)记录
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: gun话题: guns话题: criminals话题: citizens话题: ordinary
进入SanFrancisco版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
d*****h
发帖数: 1266
1
给你推荐一本书,看完再讨论. 我是每天都念给孩子听.
如果连投票权都没有,就先别插嘴要禁枪拉,等有投票权再说. 没有投票权的倒是有权拥
枪的.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/78800063/Tought-Targets-When-Criminal
Tought Targets: When Criminals Face Armed Resistance from Citizens, Cato
White Paper No. 33
The ostensible purpose of gun control legislation is to reduce firearm
deaths and injuries. The restriction of access to firearms will make
criminals unable to use guns to shoot people. Gun control laws will also
reduce the number of accidental shootings. Those are the desired effects, at
least in theory. It is important, however, for conscientious policymakers
to consider not only the stated goals of gun control regulations, but the
actual results that they produce.
What would be the effect of depriving ordinary, law-abiding citizens from
keeping arms for self-defense? One result seems certain: the law-abiding
would be at a distinct disadvantage should criminals acquire guns from
underground markets. After all, it is simply not possible for police
officers to get to every scene where they are urgently needed.
Outside of criminology circles, relatively few people can reasonably
estimate how often people use guns to fend off criminal attacks. If
policymakers are truly interested in harm reduction, they should pause to
consider how many crimes — murders, rapes, assaults, robberies —
are thwarted each year by ordinary persons with guns. The estimates of
defensive gun use range between the tens of thousands to as high as two
million each year.
This paper uses a collection of news reports of self-defense with guns over
an eight-year period to survey the circumstances and outcomes of defensive
gun uses in America.
Federal and state lawmakers often oppose repealing or amending laws
governing the ownership or carrying of guns. That opposition is typically
based on assumptions that the average citizen is incapable of successfully
employing a gun in self-defense or that possession of a gun in public will
tempt people to violence in "road rage" or other contentious situations.
Those assumptions are false. The vast majority of gun owners are ethical and
competent. That means tens of thousands of crimes are prevented each year
by ordinary citizens with guns.
1 (共1页)
进入SanFrancisco版参与讨论
相关主题
今天投票(propositions)记录求推荐mountain view, san jose附近好的car auto body shop
可恶伪善的共和党trump改革真的要开始了 (转载)
除了搞同性恋,非法移民,税,民主党还干了什么?msj 有一个十一年级的女生自杀?
今年的医疗保险竟然涨了60%国内网友太有才: 总结为什么加州会破产而德州不会
大家注意到他们死于家门口吗? (转载)转旧帖:为什么加州会破产而德州不会?
各位,举手之劳,帮助PK为什么加州会破产而德州不会?
求救出车祸后修车和善后处理问题昨天左派在白宫门口公开聚众吸毒 (转载)
“末日博士”鲁比尼说他预测的全球经济“完美风暴”正在展开 (转载)95014 迎2000亿关税,砍20万房价,求套现
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: gun话题: guns话题: criminals话题: citizens话题: ordinary