由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
Physics版 - A basic question in QFT
相关主题
eigenproblem of complex matrix (转载)Srednicki's book(zz)
is any body familiar with soliton quantization?Maldacena-Wilson loop
困扰很久的问题:当初量子力学为什么不用拉格朗日力学而用哈密顿力学问一个关于fock state的问题阿
挖坑:我觉得最美的物理理论问个scalar, tensor的问题
sud -> uud + dU论文求助
求一本书Coleman posted his QFT notes online
费曼图中间过程到底是真实的物理过程还是就是计算方法了太黑来科普 之 科学与优美
non-Halmitonian的能量eigenstate value 怎么求空间真的是连续的吗?
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: question话题: qft话题: some话题: phi话题: field
进入Physics版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
h******y
发帖数: 26
1
Some friend asked me the following question:
For a real scalar field \phi, assume that H = H_free - \int d^3\ x J \phi. J
(x, t) is just some real number, source, or background field, without second
quantization. Now, what is the amplitude \psi(x, t) for finding a particle
at time t(before, during, or after source is on/off) at position x? The J(x,
t) is nonzero only for finite period of time. And the initial state is
vacuum, when t --> -\infty
This question looks simple. However, I cannot find
d****y
发帖数: 53
2
Why do you worry about Lorentz invariance here? J(x,t) breaks time
translation symmetry anyway. Also what's the worry about causality here?
If you mean unitarity, here you are using Hamiltonian rather then Lagrangian
formulation, so unitary is there by default. If you mean causality, we are
doing quantum mechanics in flat spacetime, how could there be any issue with
causality?
Just write down the initial wave function as superposition of plane waves.
Compute the transition amplitude, maybe in pe
m**********e
发帖数: 12525
3
你去看functional quantization, page 282-292,
an introduction to quantum field theory

J
second
particle
x,
satisfie

【在 h******y 的大作中提到】
: Some friend asked me the following question:
: For a real scalar field \phi, assume that H = H_free - \int d^3\ x J \phi. J
: (x, t) is just some real number, source, or background field, without second
: quantization. Now, what is the amplitude \psi(x, t) for finding a particle
: at time t(before, during, or after source is on/off) at position x? The J(x,
: t) is nonzero only for finite period of time. And the initial state is
: vacuum, when t --> -\infty
: This question looks simple. However, I cannot find

m**********e
发帖数: 12525
4
是有这个问题,所以要加上时序

Lagrangian
are
with
oscillator

【在 d****y 的大作中提到】
: Why do you worry about Lorentz invariance here? J(x,t) breaks time
: translation symmetry anyway. Also what's the worry about causality here?
: If you mean unitarity, here you are using Hamiltonian rather then Lagrangian
: formulation, so unitary is there by default. If you mean causality, we are
: doing quantum mechanics in flat spacetime, how could there be any issue with
: causality?
: Just write down the initial wave function as superposition of plane waves.
: Compute the transition amplitude, maybe in pe

1 (共1页)
进入Physics版参与讨论
相关主题
空间真的是连续的吗?sud -> uud + dU
Renormalization in a nutshell求一本书
太黑来科普 之 理论物理最后的狂欢(七)费曼图中间过程到底是真实的物理过程还是就是计算方法了
大家对光子静质量为零如何理解?non-Halmitonian的能量eigenstate value 怎么求
eigenproblem of complex matrix (转载)Srednicki's book(zz)
is any body familiar with soliton quantization?Maldacena-Wilson loop
困扰很久的问题:当初量子力学为什么不用拉格朗日力学而用哈密顿力学问一个关于fock state的问题阿
挖坑:我觉得最美的物理理论问个scalar, tensor的问题
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: question话题: qft话题: some话题: phi话题: field