k********a
发帖数: 446 | 1 both cameras are set to F5.6, 1/60s, ISO3200, ASTIA, NR:-2, all others:
default
X100 vs. X100S -- see the attached 100% crop pics.
Looks like X100S's pic is applied with certain NR already even w/ NR=-2 --
though I won't call it waxy. Interestingly, the detail is better kept
compared to X100, e.g., the hairs and cloth etc.
the pic in the other thread seems over cooked -- I have seen that kind of
effect in LR if people set the NR to very high. | r*****j
发帖数: 7481 | | y*********e
发帖数: 7269 | 3 光线情况不一样，不能比啊
【在 k********a 的大作中提到】
: both cameras are set to F5.6, 1/60s, ISO3200, ASTIA, NR:-2, all others:
: default
: X100 vs. X100S -- see the attached 100% crop pics.
: Looks like X100S's pic is applied with certain NR already even w/ NR=-2 --
: though I won't call it waxy. Interestingly, the detail is better kept
: compared to X100, e.g., the hairs and cloth etc.
: the pic in the other thread seems over cooked -- I have seen that kind of
: effect in LR if people set the NR to very high.
| k********a
发帖数: 446 | 4 网上X100 vs X100S 高感对比已经很多了，这里主要是show一下高感下皮肤是否waxy。
回头再贴一些不同NR下的对比。
【在 y*********e 的大作中提到】
: 光线情况不一样，不能比啊
|
|
