r*********n
发帖数: 4553 | 1 It has become a myth how apple managed to become the most innovative company
by spending least money (compared to its close rivals) on R&D, not just
measured by proportion to the
total sale but also in terms of the absolute amount.
http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2012/11/07/booz-co-names-apple-the- | R******A
发帖数: 33 | 2 It's not fair to just look at R&D spending vs. Revenue. Among the list, some
have high margin, like MSFT, some have low margin, like AMZN. One way to
cheat is for any company to buy gold at $X, and sell it at $X-0.1, your
sales number will go up to the roof, and this doesn't require any R&D
investment, so your percentage will be dilluted to super low. Is that a
good indicator?
company
【在 r*********n 的大作中提到】
: It has become a myth how apple managed to become the most innovative company
: by spending least money (compared to its close rivals) on R&D, not just
: measured by proportion to the
: total sale but also in terms of the absolute amount.
: http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2012/11/07/booz-co-names-apple-the-
| l***k
发帖数: 1153 | 3 aapl花在研发上的钱真少
company
【在 r*********n 的大作中提到】
: It has become a myth how apple managed to become the most innovative company
: by spending least money (compared to its close rivals) on R&D, not just
: measured by proportion to the
: total sale but also in terms of the absolute amount.
: http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2012/11/07/booz-co-names-apple-the-
| t***t
发帖数: 6066 | 4 那种圆角长方形狗屎专利是不是也被count成apple的创新了？确实不需要多少钱。 | y****i
发帖数: 84 | 5
company
【在 r*********n 的大作中提到】
: It has become a myth how apple managed to become the most innovative company
: by spending least money (compared to its close rivals) on R&D, not just
: measured by proportion to the
: total sale but also in terms of the absolute amount.
: http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2012/11/07/booz-co-names-apple-the-
| r*********n
发帖数: 4553 | 6 Plz read again
3*, comparable to apple both by sales number and profit, is probably the
most shameless cheater in the industry by apple's standard. But still
numbers don't cheat
9 B vs 2.4 B; 6.0% vs 2.2%
In the end, I guess it is just much more "cost effective" to research on
geometry than advanced technologies such as LTE
some
【在 R******A 的大作中提到】
: It's not fair to just look at R&D spending vs. Revenue. Among the list, some
: have high margin, like MSFT, some have low margin, like AMZN. One way to
: cheat is for any company to buy gold at $X, and sell it at $X-0.1, your
: sales number will go up to the roof, and this doesn't require any R&D
: investment, so your percentage will be dilluted to super low. Is that a
: good indicator?
:
: company
| b***t
发帖数: 1248 | 7 不用对果黑的东西太较真，就像不能对果轮的东西太较真一样
some
【在 R******A 的大作中提到】
: It's not fair to just look at R&D spending vs. Revenue. Among the list, some
: have high margin, like MSFT, some have low margin, like AMZN. One way to
: cheat is for any company to buy gold at $X, and sell it at $X-0.1, your
: sales number will go up to the roof, and this doesn't require any R&D
: investment, so your percentage will be dilluted to super low. Is that a
: good indicator?
:
: company
| a****l
发帖数: 8211 | 8 No myth, the answer is very simple: STEVE JOBS!
company
【在 r*********n 的大作中提到】
: It has become a myth how apple managed to become the most innovative company
: by spending least money (compared to its close rivals) on R&D, not just
: measured by proportion to the
: total sale but also in terms of the absolute amount.
: http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2012/11/07/booz-co-names-apple-the-
| d********3
发帖数: 7220 | 9 就是乔布斯没死苹果研发费用是0也能卖东西
【在 a****l 的大作中提到】
: No myth, the answer is very simple: STEVE JOBS!
:
: company
|
|
