|
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a****n
发帖数: 3082 | 1 二十年了，还没有定论
不过下面这个分析靠谱
After reading extensively about this case I think the most logical deduction
is that the brother accidentally killed his sister. She had a large head
wound that would have killed her if she wasn't strangled first. Her father
said she often shared her brother's bed. Her body had been dragged to the
basement. She only weighed 45 lb. Either parent could have carried her
easily. The neighbor heard a loud scream sometime around midnight. She was
killed somewhere around 1:00 am or later. I think the mother found the body
after looking for her. She knew the son had accidentally killed her and didn
't want to lose another child. She shared the info with her husband and they
decided to cover up the incident. Either Patsy or John killed JonBenet
knowing she would die anyway, trying to make it look like an intruder had
done it. John knew the basement window was accessible, or he said as much
when interviewed because he had locked himself out the previous year and had
never repaired the latch. The window frame was covered in spiderwebs that
would not have been present if someone had crawled in or out. The pad on
which the note was written had pages ripped out. There were 2 false started
notes...indentations recovered by the police. A top handwriting expert in
the US was convinced that the sentence patterns, vocab, etc. showed that
Patsy had written the note. The amount of ransom demanded was exactly the
amount of a bonus received months earlier by John. Ransom notes are usually
cut out words from magazines, etc. and would have asked for a lot more money
from a millionaire. Ransom notes are notably very short, not 2 pages long
and hand written. The letter was found by Patsy at the foot of a spiral
staircase that she used every morning (who would know that?) Patsy was
dressed in the same clothes she had worn to a friends home the night before
and she was normally meticulously groomed....indicating she had never gone
to bed. John tried to steer his friend away from looking into the room in
which JonBenet was found. JB's hands were loosely bound and were in front of
her, yet there was no evidence of her struggling. Her body was draped in a
white blanket as though she was covered by a loved one. Patsy and John did
not comfort one another when the body was discovered, but were a room apart
from another....not typical behavior for grieved parents. They hired
separate attorneys almost immediately after the body was discovered. They
refused to talk to police. There were no footprints in the snow outside the
house. John placed his daughters body on the floor instead of on a couch....
like he knew unequivocally that she was dead. Patsy did not rush to the body
of her child...like she knew already also. They rushed their son out to a
friends and said he knew nothing....but the phone was still off the hook
when the police were called to the house and the police recording could
detect the voice of the boy asking "what did they find" of his parents. John
could be heard saying "we're not talking to you".
The evidence of chronic sexual abuse could have resulted from JB and her
brother's relationship. The hymen was broken and it appeared she had been "
digitally" penetrated (fingers). And, it wasn't the first time.
It just seems that this is the most logical scenario...all things considered
. It doesn't account for the 3rd party DNA on JB, but that evidence could
have been planted by the parents. There wasn't a lot of it. And it seems
like there would have been a lot more if a kidnapping was involved. And if
she were kidnapped, then why kill her? If you wanted to ransom her. It doesn
't figure. | B*Q
发帖数: 25729 | | c********d
发帖数: 11593 | 3 我觉得这段解读里最说不通的就是这个——
Either Patsy or John killed Jon Benet knowing she would die anyway, trying
to make it look like an intruder had done it.
正常的父母亲看到女儿受了重伤奄奄一息，第一反应居然不是送医院而是为了保护儿子
而勒死她？怎么想都觉得匪夷所思啊。 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
