n****G
发帖数: 1191 | 4 Those who would trade our freedom for the soup kitchen of the welfare state
have told us they have a utopian solution of peace without victory. They
call their policy "accommodation." And they say if we'll only avoid any
direct confrontation with the enemy, he'll forget his evil ways and learn to
love us. All who oppose them are indicted as warmongers. They say we offer
simple answers to complex problems. Well, perhaps there is a simple answer—
not an easy answer—but simple: If you and I have the courage to tell our
elected officials that we want our national policy based on what we know in
our hearts is morally right.
We cannot buy our security, our freedom from the threat of the bomb by
committing an immorality so great as saying to a billion human beings now
enslaved behind the Iron Curtain, "Give up your dreams of freedom because to
save our own skins, we're willing to make a deal with your slave masters."
Alexander Hamilton said, "A nation which can prefer disgrace to danger is
prepared for a master, and deserves one." Now let's set the record straight.
There's no argument over the choice between peace and war, but there's only
one guaranteed way you can have peace—and you can have it in the next
second—surrender.
Admittedly, there's a risk in any course we follow other than this, but
every lesson of history tells us that the greater risk lies in appeasement,
and this is the specter our well-meaning liberal friends refuse to face—
that their policy of accommodation is appeasement, and it gives no choice
between peace and war, only between fight or surrender. If we continue to
accommodate, continue to back and retreat, eventually we have to face the
final demand—the ultimatum. And what then—when Nikita Khrushchev has told
his people he knows what our answer will be? He has told them that we're
retreating under the pressure of the Cold War, and someday when the time
comes to deliver the final ultimatum, our surrender will be voluntary,
because by that time we will have been weakened from within spiritually,
morally, and economically. He believes this because from our side he's heard
voices pleading for "peace at any price" or "better Red than dead," or as
one commentator put it, he'd rather "live on his knees than die on his feet.
" And therein lies the road to war, because those voices don't speak for the
rest of us.
You and I know and do not believe that life is so dear and peace so sweet as
to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery. If nothing in life is
worth dying for, when did this begin—just in the face of this enemy? Or
should Moses have told the children of Israel to live in slavery under the
pharaohs? Should Christ have refused the cross? Should the patriots at
Concord Bridge have thrown down their guns and refused to fire the shot
heard 'round the world? The martyrs of history were not fools, and our
honored dead who gave their lives to stop the advance of the Nazis didn't
die in vain. Where, then, is the road to peace? Well it's a simple answer
after all.
You and I have the courage to say to our enemies, "There is a price we will
not pay." "There is a point beyond which they must not advance." And this—
this is the meaning in the phrase of Barry Goldwater's "peace through
strength." Winston Churchill said, "The destiny of man is not measured by
material computations. When great forces are on the move in the world, we
learn we're spirits—not animals." And he said, "There's something going on
in time and space, and beyond time and space, which, whether we like it or
not, spells duty."
You and I have a rendezvous with destiny.
We'll preserve for our children this, the last best hope of man on earth, or
we'll sentence them to take the last step into a thousand years of darkness
. |
