f********t
发帖数: 6999 | 1 【 以下文字转载自 History 讨论区 】
发信人: doublebull (二牛), 信区: History
标 题: 中文维基的很多作者的诚信值得怀疑
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sat Jan 25 12:48:02 2014, 美东)
尤其是在涉及到宗教、政治等话题上。
对比一下中文和英文维基关于数学家高斯的宗教信仰一段
Religion[edit]
Bühler writes that, according to correspondence with Rudolf Wagner, Gauss
did not appear to believe in a personal God.[21] He was said to be a deist.[
22][23] He further asserts that although Gauss firmly believed in the
immortality of the soul and in some sort of life after death, it was not in
a fashion that could be interpreted as Christian since Gauss explained to
Wagner that he did not believe in the Bible.[21][24][25][26][27]
According to Dunnington, Gauss's religion was based upon the search for
truth. He believed in "the immortality of the spiritual individuality, in a
personal permanence after death, in a last order of things, in an eternal,
righteous, omniscient and omnipotent God". Gauss also upheld religious
tolerance, believing it wrong to disturb others who were at peace with their
own beliefs.[2]
以上明确指出了高斯不信bible也不相信人格化的上帝。
中文却写着:
“高斯非常信教且保守
根据Dunnington的资料，高斯的信仰基于寻求真理。他相信“精神个性上的不朽，像是
个人在死后的持久性，还有最后命令的东西，以及永恒的、正义的、无所不知和无所不
能的上帝。”高斯也坚持宗教的宽容，他相信打扰其他正处在他们自己和平信念中的人
是不对的。[1]”
难道这又是和那些宣称爱因斯坦等名人是基督徒一样的trick？
我刚刚去给改了。 | w********e
发帖数: 8594 | 2 网上写个东西，也要讲诚信？这是用词不当吧。
.[
in
【在 f********t 的大作中提到】
: 【 以下文字转载自 History 讨论区 】
: 发信人: doublebull (二牛), 信区: History
: 标 题: 中文维基的很多作者的诚信值得怀疑
: 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sat Jan 25 12:48:02 2014, 美东)
: 尤其是在涉及到宗教、政治等话题上。
: 对比一下中文和英文维基关于数学家高斯的宗教信仰一段
: Religion[edit]
: Bühler writes that, according to correspondence with Rudolf Wagner, Gauss
: did not appear to believe in a personal God.[21] He was said to be a deist.[
: 22][23] He further asserts that although Gauss firmly believed in the
|
|
